本文選題：死刑　切入點：民意　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：李昌奎案是我國近年來在死刑判例上存在著較大爭議的案件，經(jīng)過了一審判處死刑立即執(zhí)行，二審判處死刑緩期執(zhí)行以及再審判處死刑立即執(zhí)行三個階段。其中，在二審法院宣布判處李昌奎死刑緩期執(zhí)行后，全國的輿論幾乎一邊倒地表達出對審判結(jié)果的不理解，認為量刑過輕，要求李昌奎判處死刑立即執(zhí)行。 在輿論界強烈的反應(yīng)背后是以強大的民意作為支持的，以至于學(xué)術(shù)界存在一種觀點即：民意綁架了司法，，學(xué)術(shù)界和輿論界在對待李昌奎是否應(yīng)當(dāng)執(zhí)行死刑上有著較為尖銳的矛盾。而這種民意對死刑的態(tài)度是本文研究了重點，就李昌奎案而言，民意是持支持死刑的，其中的原因有三個方面：一是對于李昌奎的家人而言，古老的血親復(fù)仇主義是其最能代表他們的情緒，他們所追求的死刑結(jié)果實際上是希望用司法手段代替他們不能的復(fù)仇手段而完成復(fù)仇。二是對于其他與李昌奎有共同生活的圈子的人而言，他們對于李昌奎追求死刑，更多的是出于人類本性中免于恐懼的需要，他們希望司法機關(guān)能夠一勞永逸的解決掉李昌奎這個威脅，而不至于有死灰復(fù)燃的一天。三是對于普通民眾而言，他們更多是出于傳統(tǒng)的正義感，這種正義感即是“殺人償命”，“殺人償命”并非現(xiàn)代法律追求的結(jié)果但卻是人類長期傳統(tǒng)遺留下的一個習(xí)慣，因此普通民眾更愿意這種習(xí)慣保持下去。 在當(dāng)今的國際的刑罰潮流中，死刑已經(jīng)被逐漸視為不夠人性的刑罰手段，在絕大多數(shù)國家都被選擇廢除死刑。但是在存在死刑的國家，阻礙廢除死刑的最為有影響的原因并非是國家上層建筑的意志而是普通民眾的死刑觀點——死刑民意。 死刑民意是各國死刑文化所遺留的結(jié)果，雖然各國的死刑文化有所差異，但在死刑民意上卻保持有相同的特征，這種特征主要有兩個方面：一方面是死刑民意具有穩(wěn)定性，在穩(wěn)定社會不同時期，支持死刑的民眾的數(shù)量是較為穩(wěn)定，這種穩(wěn)定不會因為上層建筑的政策而得到改變，因為它僅僅是死刑文化的遺留體現(xiàn)。另一方面是死刑民意也具有波動性，當(dāng)社會情況存在著較為劇烈的變化的時候，支持死刑的民眾數(shù)目會突然的增加或者減少，這種變化可能是由于具體的犯罪引起的，也可能是由于犯罪率而引起的，以及其他如死刑知識的普及等因素引起的。 對于我國而言，無論死刑改革如何發(fā)展，死刑民意是不能避開的一個課題。只有正確的認識死刑民意的穩(wěn)定性和充分的利用死刑民意的波動性才能將死刑改革發(fā)揮出最大的效果，同時也能更為平和的被民眾所接受。
[Abstract]:The Li Changkui case is in our country in recent years on the death penalty case controversial cases, after a trial at the immediate execution of death penalty, two sentenced to death with a two-year suspension of execution and re trial in three stages the immediate execution of death penalty. Among them, in the second instance court sentenced Li Changkui announced the death sentence with a reprieve, the public almost overwhelmingly expression do not understand the outcome of the trial, said the sentence was too light, Li Changkui sentenced to death immediately.
Behind the strong public opinion reaction is a strong public opinion as support, so that a view that existing in the academic circles: the public kidnapped judicial, academic and public opinion in the treatment of whether Li Changkui should be executed on a relatively sharp contradiction between the public opinion and attitude. On the death penalty is the focus of this study. Li Changkui case, public opinion is to support the death penalty, the reason has three aspects: one is for the family of Li Changkui, the ancient blood revenge doctrine is the most representative of their emotions, the death penalty results they pursue is actually hope by judicial means they cannot replace the revenge means complete revenge the two is for the other. And Li Changkui has the common life of people, their pursuit of the death penalty for Li Changkui, more out of human nature from fear, they hope The judicial authorities can resolve the threat once and for all Li Changkui, and not a day. The three is a stirring among the dry bones for ordinary people, they are more out of the traditional sense of justice, the sense of justice is "Sharenchangming", "Sharenchangming" is not the pursuit of modern law results but it is a long tradition of human. The habit of leaving, so ordinary people are more willing to continue this habit.
鍦ㄥ綋浠婄殑鍥介檯鐨勫垜緗氭疆嫻佷腑,姝誨垜宸茬粡琚

本文編號：1617598