本文選題：刑事政策　切入點：行為刑法　出處：《上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(法治論叢)》2016年01期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：我國刑法盜竊罪中"多次盜竊"的立法變遷反映了勞教制度廢除的背景下刑事政策對立法的重大影響。盡管與對特定行為之不法及程度的評價應(yīng)以單次行為為基礎(chǔ)的原則不相一致,但在我國當(dāng)下卻也具有必要性。實踐中,"多次盜竊"的適用亂象并未隨著司法解釋對其"二年內(nèi)盜竊三次以上"的界定而消弭,從而不得不對上述司法解釋再行解釋,這也反映出司法解釋水平的欠缺和技術(shù)的粗糙。事實上,"二年內(nèi)盜竊三次以上"應(yīng)當(dāng)被界定為未經(jīng)任何法律規(guī)范處理的行政法意義上的盜竊行為,唯此方能實現(xiàn)行政法與刑法的銜接與協(xié)調(diào)。
[Abstract]:The legislative changes of "multiple theft" in the larceny of criminal law in our country reflect the significant influence of criminal policy on legislation under the background of abolishing the system of re-education through labour. Although, the evaluation of the lawlessness and degree of a particular act should be based on the single act. The basic principles are inconsistent. However, it is also necessary at present in our country. In practice, the confusion of the application of "multiple theft" has not been eliminated with the definition of "theft more than three times in two years" in the judicial interpretation, thus the judicial explanation mentioned above has to be explained again. This also reflects the lack of judicial interpretation and technical roughness. In fact, "theft more than three times in two years" should be defined as theft in the sense of administrative law that has not been dealt with by any legal norm. Only in this way can the connection and coordination between administrative law and criminal law be realized.
【作者單位】： 重慶大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D924.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 江溯;;關(guān)于單一正犯體系的若干辯駁[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2011年05期

2 倪文;;我國刑事司法中關(guān)于形式主義的反思——關(guān)于曹天案的法律思考[J];長春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報;2010年08期

3 于改之;賈配龍;;美國反恐立法評析[J];山東社會科學(xué);2013年09期

4 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 曲新久 鄧超;假冒學(xué)生乞討不具有刑罰可罰性[N];檢察日報;2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 宋小軍;行為人無價值探究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2008年

2 王吉龍;“多次行為”研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：1615939