本文選題：聚眾斗毆　切入點(diǎn)：犯罪構(gòu)成　出處：《蘇州大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在我國(guó)現(xiàn)行刑法中，聚眾斗毆罪的法條采取簡(jiǎn)單罪狀方式表述，定義過(guò)于籠統(tǒng)和寬泛，在司法實(shí)踐和認(rèn)定上存在許多疑難問(wèn)題。筆者結(jié)合司法實(shí)務(wù)中碰到的案例，對(duì)聚眾斗毆罪犯罪構(gòu)成的四個(gè)方面進(jìn)行論述，，認(rèn)為聚眾斗毆罪侵害的是復(fù)雜客體，主觀上不要求雙方同時(shí)有斗毆故意且行為人不一定具有流氓動(dòng)機(jī)，客觀方面則表現(xiàn)為聚眾和斗毆兩個(gè)實(shí)行行為，犯罪主體中可能不存在首要分子。隨后，筆者認(rèn)為刑法第292條第二款的規(guī)定是注意規(guī)定，是轉(zhuǎn)化犯而非想象競(jìng)合犯，對(duì)于司法實(shí)務(wù)中聚眾斗毆罪的轉(zhuǎn)化主體的認(rèn)定和幾種特殊情況一一列舉并進(jìn)行分析。最后，筆者結(jié)合較有影響的常熟聚眾斗毆案，認(rèn)為聚眾斗毆中存在正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)情況，并對(duì)正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)的認(rèn)定進(jìn)行分析，以期對(duì)該罪的實(shí)務(wù)認(rèn)定有所幫助。
[Abstract]:In the current criminal law of our country, the crime of affray is expressed in a simple way, the definition is too general and broad, and there are many difficult problems in judicial practice and cognizance. Four aspects of the constitution of the crime of affray are discussed. It is considered that the crime of affray infringes on the complex object, and subjectively does not require both sides to have the intention of brawl and the perpetrator does not necessarily have the motive of hooliganism. On the objective side, there may be no ringleaders in the subject of the crime. Then, the author thinks that the second paragraph of Article 292 of the Criminal Law is a regulation of attention, which is a transformed crime, not an imaginative co-offender. For the identification of the transforming subject of the crime of affray in the judicial practice and the analysis of several special circumstances, the author considers that there is a situation of justifiable defense in the affray case of Changshu, which is a relatively influential case of affray in Changshu. And the identification of self-defense is analyzed in order to help the practice of the crime.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 張菁;;聚眾斗毆罪的司法認(rèn)定[J];法學(xué);2006年03期

2 張啟環(huán);;聚眾斗毆罪的實(shí)務(wù)問(wèn)題研究[J];公安研究;2013年02期

3 張屹;;聚眾斗毆罪的法律適用[J];華東刑事司法評(píng)論;2003年01期

本文編號(hào)：1596255