本文選題：積極一般預(yù)防　切入點(diǎn)：刑罰正當(dāng)性　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)》2017年04期 　論文類(lèi)型：期刊論文

【摘要】：積極一般預(yù)防將刑罰的正當(dāng)性承載于規(guī)范意識(shí)的喚醒和規(guī)范遵循的實(shí)現(xiàn),無(wú)法祛除刑罰威懾基礎(chǔ)上的認(rèn)同因子,忠誠(chéng)惡法的正義悖反,以及將人作為他人犯罪的工具利用,陷入規(guī)范違反之現(xiàn)象描述等同犯罪本質(zhì)、刑罰目之應(yīng)然義理的刑罰正當(dāng)性危機(jī)之中。溯源刑法懲罰的正當(dāng)性,刑法規(guī)范發(fā)端社會(huì)共識(shí),公眾意志;犯罪本質(zhì)源自全體公民人權(quán)和個(gè)人基本人權(quán)的不得已權(quán)衡。鑒于以往積極一般預(yù)防停留現(xiàn)象,作用表面的弊病,以及與消極一般預(yù)防同意闡釋和反面論證的關(guān)系,需要重釋積極一般預(yù)防的概念內(nèi)涵,匡正積極一般預(yù)防刑罰正當(dāng)性理論預(yù)設(shè),確鑿刑法適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn),以此使積極一般預(yù)防名實(shí)相符。具體而言,積極一般預(yù)防應(yīng)當(dāng)以刑法規(guī)范遵循公眾意愿為核心要義,過(guò)濾威懾認(rèn)同的生發(fā);以保障全體公民人權(quán)為刑罰正當(dāng)性理論預(yù)設(shè),避免遵循惡法的偏失;以不得已原則為刑法動(dòng)用的圭臬,消弭人性尊重與工具利用的矛盾。
[Abstract]:Positive general prevention carries the legitimacy of punishment on the awakening of normative consciousness and the realization of normative compliance, which cannot dispel the identification factor on the basis of penalty deterrence, the justice and opposition of loyalty and draconian law, and the use of human beings as a tool for others to commit crimes. Falling into the crisis of the justification of criminal law which is equivalent to the nature of the crime and the justice of the penalty object, the origin of the criminal law punishment, the social consensus at the beginning of the criminal law norm, and the public will; The essence of the crime derives from the tradeoff between the human rights of all citizens and the fundamental human rights of the individual. In view of the previous positive and general prevention phenomenon, the apparent ills of the role, and the relationship with negative general prevention consent interpretation and negative argument, It is necessary to reinterpret the concept of active general prevention, correct the theoretical presupposition of the legitimacy of active general prevention penalty, and establish the applicable standard of criminal law, so as to make the positive general prevention consistent with the actual situation. The active general prevention should take the criminal law norm as the core meaning, filter the development of the deterrent identity, take the protection of the human rights of all citizens as the theoretical presupposition of the justice of the penalty, and avoid the bias of following the draconian law. The principle of necessity is used in criminal law to eliminate the contradiction between respect for human nature and the use of tools.
【作者單位】： 重慶郵電大學(xué)網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間安全與信息法學(xué)院;
【基金】：2016年國(guó)家社科基金青年項(xiàng)目“刑法淵源中的立法科學(xué)化基本問(wèn)題研究”(16CFX025)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D924.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 邱興隆;從一元到多元:一般預(yù)防論的流變[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2000年05期

2 陳興良;一般預(yù)防的觀念轉(zhuǎn)變[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2000年05期

3 邱興隆;一般預(yù)防論的價(jià)值分析[J];法學(xué)論壇;2000年04期

4 邱興隆;論一般預(yù)防的正當(dāng)性──兼與否定論者商榷[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2001年04期

5 王宏玉;規(guī)誡的力量——談刑罰之一般預(yù)防[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

6 李衛(wèi)紅;;對(duì)一般預(yù)防的否定論證[J];中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

7 韓友誼;積極的一般預(yù)防[J];河北法學(xué);2005年02期

8 陸詩(shī)忠;;論一般預(yù)防的合目的性[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年01期

9 周少華;;作為目的的一般預(yù)防[J];法學(xué)研究;2008年02期

10 韓軼;對(duì)刑罰一般預(yù)防的再認(rèn)識(shí)[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2000年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1589238