本文選題：賣淫　切入點：組織賣淫　出處：《遼寧大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：組織賣淫作為一種淫媒類犯罪,它所帶來的危害性主要表現(xiàn)在對社會管理秩序的擾亂以及對社會風尚的侵蝕。刑法對該種行為的打擊更多的是在于其“有組織性”的賣淫,它比普通的賣淫所帶來的社會危害性要大的多。實踐中有組織賣淫的情形也十分復雜,正是基于此,本文從以下幾個部分對實踐中可能存在的一些問題作出論述。第一部分,該部分重點對組織賣淫罪中賣淫的概念以及賣淫的主體和對象進行了梳理,這是構成本罪必須厘清的問題,因為現(xiàn)在的性交易方式開始呈現(xiàn)多種多樣的形態(tài),如雞奸、口淫、手淫、波推等等,這些行為方式從立法原意以及對社會的危害性上看與性器官接觸這樣方式的賣淫并沒有本質上的區(qū)別,均是廣義上的賣淫,對組織實施這些行為的也應當認定為組織賣淫罪。第二部分,主要論述的問題是組織賣淫罪與相關罪名之間的關系,重點論述了組織賣淫罪與強迫賣淫罪之間、協(xié)助組織賣淫罪之間的關系,其中對組織賣淫罪中的“組織”的理解是該部分重點,“組織”行為中不應當包含“強迫”手段,否則組織賣淫罪的外延將包含強迫賣淫罪,這與現(xiàn)行立法本意好似不相符的。其次對組織賣淫罪與協(xié)助組織賣淫罪的罪間界限問題作了充分的論證,首先論證的是組織賣淫罪中沒有主、從犯的區(qū)分。從本質上看,協(xié)助組織賣淫的行為構成組織賣淫的從犯,只不過刑法將這種幫助行為單獨規(guī)定為一罪,這突出體現(xiàn)了刑法對該種行為的社會危害性的重視,且刑法做這樣的規(guī)定在理論上是不存在障礙的。因此應當從主、從犯的角度劃分出組織賣淫罪與協(xié)助組織賣淫罪的罪間界限。接著該部分還具體論述了組織賣淫罪與容留賣淫罪的罪間界限問題。第三部分,該部分主要論述組織賣淫罪的犯罪形態(tài)問題。首先,組織賣淫罪的既遂標準應當以“組織行為”為基準,不應將是否實施了“賣淫行為”作為判斷本罪的既遂,但是組織行為完成應當考慮它的社會意義,即以能夠向不特定人提供賣淫活動作為既遂標準,而不是單純的以手段行為的實施完畢作為既遂標準。另外,本文論述了組織賣淫罪的罪數(shù)問題,基于本文所持觀點,因為組織賣淫罪當中的“組織行為”并不包含“強迫行為”,因此所謂的以強制手段實施的組織賣淫行為,不應以牽連犯對待,應當認為符合數(shù)個犯罪構成,構成數(shù)罪。
[Abstract]:Organization prostitution, as a kind of pimp crime, brings harmfulness mainly in disturbing the social management order and eroding the social fashion. The criminal law strikes this kind of behavior more in its "organized" prostitution. It is much more harmful to society than ordinary prostitution. The situation of organized prostitution in practice is also very complex. Based on this, this paper discusses some possible problems in practice from the following parts. This part focuses on the concept of prostitution in the crime of organizing prostitution, as well as the subject and object of prostitution. This is a problem that must be clarified as the crime is constituted, because the current ways of sex trade are beginning to take on a variety of forms, such as sodomy and adultery. Masturbation, push-ups, etc., in terms of legislative intent and harmfulness to society, there is no essential difference between prostitution and sexual organ contact, all of which are broadly defined as prostitution. The second part mainly deals with the relationship between the crime of organizing prostitution and the related charges, with the emphasis on the relationship between the crime of organizing prostitution and the crime of forced prostitution. The relationship between the offences of assisting the organization of prostitution, in which the understanding of the "organization" in the crime of organizing prostitution is the focus of this part, and that the conduct of the "organization" should not contain the means of "coercion", otherwise the extension of the crime of organizing prostitution would include the crime of forced prostitution, This seems to be inconsistent with the original intention of the current legislation. Secondly, it makes a full argument on the boundary between the crime of organizing prostitution and the crime of assisting the organization of prostitution. The first argument is that there is no distinction between the principal and the accomplice in the crime of organizing prostitution. Aiding the organization of prostitution constitutes an accessory to the organization of prostitution, except that the criminal law makes this aiding act a separate crime, which highlights the importance that the criminal law attaches to the social harmfulness of the act. And the criminal law makes such a provision in theory there are no obstacles. From the angle of accomplice, the author distinguishes the boundary between the crime of organizing prostitution and the crime of assisting in organizing prostitution, and then discusses the problem of the boundary between the crime of organizing prostitution and the crime of sheltering prostitution. The third part discusses the problem of the boundary between the crime of organizing prostitution and the crime of sheltering prostitution. First of all, the standard of accomplishing the crime of organizing prostitution should be based on the "organizational act", and should not judge the accomplishment of the crime by whether or not the "act of prostitution" has been carried out. However, the completion of organizational behavior should take into account its social significance, that is, to be able to provide prostitution to a non-specific person as the criterion of accomplishment, rather than simply using the completion of the implementation of the act of means as the criterion of accomplishment. In addition, This paper discusses the problem of the number of crimes of organizing prostitution, based on the viewpoint of this paper, because the "organizational act" in the crime of organizing prostitution does not include "forced act", so the so-called "organized prostitution" is carried out by coercive means. Should not be treated as implicated criminals, should be considered consistent with a number of crimes constitute, constitute a number of crimes.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 周嘯天;;“組織、強迫、引誘幼女賣淫”規(guī)定再解讀[J];華東政法大學學報;2016年02期

2 葉迪南;;組織賣淫罪的司法認定[J];湖北警官學院學報;2015年04期

3 趙軍;;死刑存廢的民意維度——以組織賣淫罪可罰性觀念的測量為中心[J];法學研究;2015年02期

4 徐松林;;我國刑法應取消組織賣淫罪[J];政法論壇;2014年06期

5 徐松林;;以刑釋罪:一種可行的刑法實質解釋方法——以對“組織賣淫罪”的解釋為例[J];法商研究;2014年06期

6 姜敏;;法益保護前置:刑法對食品安全保護的路徑選擇——以幫助行為正犯化為研究視角[J];北京師范大學學報(社會科學版);2013年05期

7 王宇展;潘丙林;趙宇翔;;組織賣淫罪客觀方面的要件[J];人民司法;2013年14期

8 何萍;;論組織賣淫罪中的組織行為——殷某組織賣淫案評析[J];華東政法大學學報;2013年04期

9 閻二鵬;;共犯行為正犯化及其反思[J];國家檢察官學院學報;2013年03期

10 茹士春;;論幫助行為單獨定罪——以協(xié)助組織賣淫罪與組織賣淫罪的切分為例[J];中國刑事法雜志;2011年01期

，

本文編號：1557927