本文關鍵詞： 故意傷害 司法實踐 特異體質(zhì) 犯罪未遂 構(gòu)罪標準　出處：《西南政法大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：故意傷害犯罪是嚴重危害人們?nèi)罕姷娜松頇?quán)利和社會秩序的安定的犯罪,在司法實踐中是一種常見性、高發(fā)性的犯罪,并且在具體處理這些案件時’常常會引發(fā)各種爭議。本文通過對司法實踐中常見的爭議進行分析,并借鑒域外法律在這些方面的規(guī)定及理論,提出對現(xiàn)行故意傷害罪立法方面進行完善,以期對司法實踐有所裨益。本文共分三部分。第一部分為故意傷害罪的犯罪構(gòu)成概述,為本文的基礎理論,在確定故意傷害罪的概念的基礎上對故意傷害罪的犯罪構(gòu)成要件進行闡述。首先,故意傷害罪侵犯的客體是他人的身體健康權(quán),該罪保護的法益即他人的身體健康,且該法益受到損害是行為人所追求或放任而導致的。其次,故意傷害罪的客觀方面是指行為人實施的行為非法損害他人身體健康,即包括行為人客觀上實施了傷害的行為;傷害行為具有非法性;傷害行為對他人必須造成一定的損害結(jié)果;傷害行為與傷害結(jié)果間要有因果關系。再次,故意傷害罪的主體是的一般主體,即達到刑事責任年齡并具備刑事責任能力的自然人,但該罪造成的結(jié)果不同,其刑事責任能力主體不同。最后,故意傷害罪主觀方面表現(xiàn)為故意,包括直接故意和間接故意,甚至包括概括的故意。第二部分,從司法實踐運用的角度出發(fā),并結(jié)合各國相關法律的認定,對各爭議問題的不同觀點進行研究。在對故意傷害致特異體質(zhì)者死亡案件研究中,從理論上分析此類案件的本質(zhì)特征,認定結(jié)果加重犯性質(zhì)的理論及分析主觀上的罪過;并確定行為與結(jié)果之間的因果關系為條件說的客觀歸責理論;主觀罪過方面上注意結(jié)果加重犯的特殊性。而故意傷害未遂問題上,從故意傷害未遂的構(gòu)罪爭議和故意傷害未遂的類型爭議兩方面進行分析,故意傷害未遂的構(gòu)罪爭議是指故意傷害罪中致人輕傷的是否存在犯罪未遂方面的爭議,而類型爭議實則是探討故意傷害(重傷)的未遂類型。此外,由于我國實行的是簡明立法例,對故意傷害罪的規(guī)定僅僅只是簡單的幾句話,所以在司法認定中也存在諸多爭議,如“傷害行為”的認定就存在爭議,本文從“傷害行為”的界定和方式入手,闡述如何對“傷害行為”進行認定。又如在司法實踐中遇到的故思傷吾致多人輕傷及多次傷害致人輕傷問題,即使通過罪數(shù)的分析界定,亦不能較為完善的處理罪刑不相適應的問題。而在構(gòu)罪標準方面,則通過理論分析和域外法律解釋進行分析。第三部分,up針對本文前述問題,并結(jié)合司法實踐,在不大規(guī)模改變現(xiàn)有法律條文以及理論體系的基礎上,提出對現(xiàn)行故意傷害罪立法方面提出完善建議,建議設立“暴行罪”以及增加“情節(jié)較輕”和“情節(jié)嚴重”量刑檔次。
[Abstract]:The crime of intentional injury is a crime that seriously endangers the people's personal rights and social order. It is a common and high incidence crime in judicial practice. And in the specific handling of these cases, 'will often cause a variety of disputes. Through the analysis of common disputes in judicial practice, and learn from the extraterritorial laws in these aspects of the provisions and theories, This paper is divided into three parts. The first part is an overview of the crime of intentional injury, which is the basic theory of this paper. On the basis of defining the concept of intentional injury crime, this paper expounds the constitutive elements of intentional injury crime. Firstly, the object of intentional injury crime infringement is the body health rights of others, and the legal interest protected by the crime is the physical health of others. Secondly, the objective aspect of the crime of intentional injury refers to the act of illegal harm to the physical health of others, that is, the act of harming the person objectively. The injurious behavior is illegal; the injurious behavior must cause certain damage result to others; there must be causality between the injurious behavior and the injurious result. Again, the subject of the crime of intentional injury is the general subject, That is, the natural person who has reached the age of criminal responsibility and has the capacity of criminal responsibility, but the result of the crime is different, and the subject of criminal responsibility is different. Finally, the subjective aspect of the crime of intentional injury is intentional, including direct intent and indirect intent. The second part, from the point of view of judicial practice, and combined with the recognition of relevant laws in various countries, to study the different viewpoints of various controversial issues. In the study of death cases caused by intentional injury to specific physique, This paper theoretically analyzes the essential characteristics of such cases, determines the theory of aggravating the nature of the result of the crime and analyzes the subjective guilt, and determines the causal relationship between the behavior and the result as the objective imputation theory. In terms of subjective guilt, attention is paid to the particularity of aggravated consequential offense. On the issue of attempted intentional injury, this paper analyzes the two aspects of the controversy of the construction of attempted intentional injury and the type dispute of attempted intentional injury. The dispute on the construction of attempted intentional injury refers to the dispute on whether or not there is an attempt to commit a crime caused by minor injury in the crime of intentional injury, while the dispute of type is actually to explore the type of attempt of intentional injury (serious injury). Because our country implements the simple legislation example, the stipulation of the crime of intentional injury is only a few words, so there are many disputes in the judicial cognizance, such as the identification of the "injurious act". This article begins with the definition and method of "injurious behavior", and expounds how to identify "injurious behavior". Even through the analysis and definition of the number of crimes, it is not possible to deal with the problem that the crime and punishment are not suitable. In terms of the standard of crime construction, it is analyzed through theoretical analysis and the interpretation of extraterritorial laws. The third part focuses on the above-mentioned problems in this paper. Combined with judicial practice, on the basis of not changing the existing legal provisions and theoretical system on a large scale, the author puts forward some suggestions to improve the legislation of the crime of intentional injury. It is suggested to establish "atrocity crimes" and to increase the penalty levels of "less serious" and "serious circumstances".
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 邱威;;論先行行為引起的不作為犯與結(jié)果加重犯的關系[J];電子科技大學學報(社科版);2011年02期

2 王志祥;;故意傷害罪理論研究六十年[J];山東警察學院學報;2009年03期

3 汪紅飛;;故意傷害罪若干爭議問題探討[J];浙江萬里學院學報;2006年04期

4 劉樹德;;論刑法第十三條“但書”規(guī)定[J];華東刑事司法評論;2004年02期

5 王尚新;關于刑法情節(jié)顯著輕微規(guī)定的思考[J];法學研究;2001年05期

6 張明楷;故意傷害罪探疑[J];中國法學;2001年03期

7 徐逸仁;論故意傷害罪的既遂與未遂[J];法學評論;1992年06期

8 趙秉志;故意傷害罪的未遂初探[J];法學;1986年08期

9 趙長青;試論殺人罪與傷害罪的區(qū)別[J];青海社會科學;1981年02期

10 鐘家光;從犯罪行為來認定殺人罪與傷害罪[J];人民司法;1980年06期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 孫鈞杰;;傳染性病給男友不構(gòu)成故意傷害罪[N];法治快報;2006年

，

本文編號：1539853