本文關(guān)鍵詞： 財(cái)產(chǎn)刑 財(cái)產(chǎn)部分判決 執(zhí)行難 執(zhí)行程序 執(zhí)行機(jī)制　出處：《上海交通大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：1997年修訂的《中華人民共和國刑法》大量設(shè)置了財(cái)產(chǎn)刑，由此刑事判決中適用財(cái)產(chǎn)刑的比例越來越高。同時(shí)近年來經(jīng)濟(jì)型犯罪、侵犯公民財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)利類案件始終處于高發(fā)態(tài)勢(shì)，這使得大部分的刑事判決都會(huì)涉及財(cái)產(chǎn)部分的判決內(nèi)容。但相較于對(duì)被告人人身刑的嚴(yán)格執(zhí)行，在我國司法實(shí)踐中，對(duì)有關(guān)財(cái)產(chǎn)刑及財(cái)產(chǎn)部分的執(zhí)行卻相對(duì)隨意，執(zhí)行到位率不高，一定程度上使涉及財(cái)產(chǎn)部分的刑事判決成為一紙空文。這嚴(yán)重影響了刑罰的設(shè)置目的，從而損害了司法裁判的嚴(yán)肅性和權(quán)威性。面對(duì)當(dāng)前經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪案件高發(fā)，涉案金額迅猛上升的嚴(yán)峻態(tài)勢(shì)，如何完善刑事涉財(cái)產(chǎn)部分判決的執(zhí)行機(jī)制，加大執(zhí)行力度，切實(shí)發(fā)揮刑罰的懲戒與警示功能，已經(jīng)成為司法機(jī)關(guān)防范與懲治犯罪的重要內(nèi)容。 本文首先簡要介紹了刑事涉財(cái)產(chǎn)判決的執(zhí)行范圍，闡述了目前司法實(shí)踐中刑事涉財(cái)產(chǎn)判決執(zhí)行難的現(xiàn)狀，繼而分析執(zhí)行難的原因：既有被執(zhí)行人履行能力不足，執(zhí)行成本過高的客觀因素，也有長期以來“重主刑輕附加刑”，對(duì)財(cái)產(chǎn)刑執(zhí)行不夠重視的主觀因素，更主要的是在于立法不夠完善，制度上存有缺陷，，如各機(jī)關(guān)職能不明確，缺乏有效配合，缺乏財(cái)產(chǎn)查控機(jī)制，缺乏監(jiān)督機(jī)制等。在此基礎(chǔ)上，本文提出應(yīng)建立財(cái)產(chǎn)查控協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制，特別是在偵查階段加強(qiáng)對(duì)被告人財(cái)產(chǎn)的調(diào)查及控制；建立財(cái)產(chǎn)刑執(zhí)行的監(jiān)督機(jī)制；擴(kuò)大罰金刑的減免事由，完善罰金刑的減免程序；設(shè)立罰金刑易科自由刑制度；完善有關(guān)執(zhí)行程序等一系列解決方案。
[Abstract]:In 1997, the Criminal Law of the people's Republic of China amended a large number of property penalty, so the proportion of property penalty applied in the criminal judgment is higher and higher. At the same time, economic crimes in recent years. Infringement of civil property rights cases have always been in a high situation, which makes most of the criminal judgments will involve the content of the property part of the judgment, but compared with the strict execution of the defendant's personal punishment. In the judicial practice of our country, the execution of the property penalty and the property part is relatively arbitrary, and the execution rate is not high. To a certain extent, the criminal judgment involving the part of property becomes a dead letter, which seriously affects the purpose of setting up the penalty, thus damaging the seriousness and authority of the judicial decision, and facing the high incidence of economic crimes. The amount of money involved in the rapid rise in the grim situation, how to improve the criminal property part of the execution mechanism, strengthen the implementation of the force, and give practical play to the punishment of punishment and warning function. It has become an important content of the judicial organs to prevent and punish crime. Firstly, this paper briefly introduces the execution scope of the criminal property judgment, and expounds the current situation of the difficulty in the execution of the criminal property judgment in the current judicial practice. Then it analyzes the reasons for the difficulty of execution: there are not only the objective factors that the executor has insufficient ability to perform and the high execution cost, but also the subjective factor that has been paying more attention to the execution of property punishment for a long time. The more important is that the legislation is not perfect, there are defects in the system, such as the function of various organs is not clear, lack of effective cooperation, lack of property inspection and control mechanism, lack of supervision mechanism. On this basis. This paper puts forward that the coordination mechanism of property investigation and control should be established, especially the investigation and control of the defendant's property should be strengthened in the investigation stage. Establishing the supervision mechanism of the execution of property punishment; Expand the reasons for the reduction of fine punishment, improve the remission procedures of fine punishment; Establishing the system of free punishment of fine and punishment; Improve the implementation procedures and a series of solutions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.1;D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬兵;;論我國罰金刑制度的功能及完善[J];人民論壇;2014年02期

2 羅偉;;財(cái)產(chǎn)刑的退賠和民事債務(wù)混同時(shí)的處置原則[J];人民司法;2013年20期

3 閆燕;劉慧卓;;財(cái)產(chǎn)刑執(zhí)行的相關(guān)問題研究[J];人民司法;2013年07期

4 胡茜筠;李哲;常健;;財(cái)產(chǎn)刑執(zhí)行情況調(diào)研分析[J];人民檢察;2013年04期

5 劉世友;;從現(xiàn)實(shí)邁向理想——罰金刑執(zhí)行完善路徑之探尋[J];法律適用;2013年01期

6 萬志鵬;黃曉斌;;論沒收財(cái)產(chǎn)刑中的“財(cái)產(chǎn)”[J];中國刑事法雜志;2011年04期

7 唐震;;評(píng)最高人民法院《關(guān)于財(cái)產(chǎn)刑執(zhí)行問題的若干規(guī)定》[J];法治論叢;2010年05期

8 廣東省佛山市中級(jí)人民法院課題組;;刑事附帶民事訴訟案件審理與執(zhí)行情況的調(diào)查報(bào)告[J];法律適用;2008年07期

9 高遙生;邢四文;陳衛(wèi)東;李洪江;劉青峰;王九川;;聚焦刑事附帶民事訴訟[J];法制資訊;2008年02期

10 沈亮;陳鴻翔;羅智勇;;我國刑事被害人救助制度初探[J];中國審判;2007年12期

本文編號(hào)：1474057