本文關(guān)鍵詞： 偽造行為 對象 可罰性特征 基本類型 立法完善　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：偽造行為自古有之，行為人通過不同方法對各種事物進(jìn)行偽造。但是，并不是所有的偽造都是刑法中的偽造行為。刑法中的偽造行為應(yīng)該是符合構(gòu)成要件的行為，會嚴(yán)重?fù)p害社會公共信用。由于我國刑法是以犯罪客體為依據(jù)來劃分犯罪類別的，國內(nèi)學(xué)者在研究偽造型犯罪時大多著眼于個罪的犯罪構(gòu)成要件，甚少有對偽造行為進(jìn)行專門的系統(tǒng)性研究。本文通過對我國刑法中的偽造行為進(jìn)行深入分析，以期能夠?qū)ξ覈牧⒎ㄅc司法實(shí)踐產(chǎn)生積極影響。 在引言部分，筆者主要說明了選題的原因、背景以及寫作意義。除了引言，本文正文共分4個部分，約4萬余字。 第一部分是我國刑法中偽造行為的概述。在這部分，筆者首先介紹了偽造的詞源、偽造行為的歷史淵源以及我國古代關(guān)于偽造犯罪的相關(guān)立法規(guī)定。其次，以刑法中的行為概念為切入點(diǎn)，引出我國現(xiàn)行刑法中偽造行為的含義及本質(zhì)。 第二部分是我國刑法中偽造行為的對象和可罰性特征。這部分是文章的重點(diǎn)之一。筆者從屬性和范圍兩方面對其對象進(jìn)行界定，認(rèn)為我國刑法中偽造行為的屬性應(yīng)是“社會公共信用性”和“真實(shí)存在性”，范圍則主要限定在貨幣、有價證券、文書和印章四大類；以“足以使一般人誤以為真實(shí)有效”和“嚴(yán)重影響社會秩序”對刑法中的偽造行為進(jìn)行可罰性分析。 第三部分是我國刑法中偽造行為的基本類型。在這部分，筆者按照不同標(biāo)準(zhǔn)對偽造行為進(jìn)行分類。首先，基于制作權(quán)限將偽造行為分為有形偽造行為和無形偽造行為，其中有形偽造行為包括了狹義的有形偽造和有形變造，無形偽造行為包括了狹義的無形偽造和無形變造；其次，基于行為方式將偽造行為分為偽造、變造、擅自制造。 第四部分是我國刑法中偽造型犯罪的立法完善。基于前文的論述，，筆者將本文的落腳點(diǎn)放在偽造型犯罪的立法完善這一塊。首先，筆者對我國刑法中偽造型犯罪的立法現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行分析，主要闡明了偽造型犯罪的現(xiàn)行立法體例、行為對象和行為方式這三方面的困境，進(jìn)而提出自己的些許完善建議。
[Abstract]:Forgery has existed since ancient times, the actor forges all kinds of things through different methods. Not all forgery is forgery in criminal law. Forgery in criminal law should be in accordance with the constitutive elements of the act. Because the criminal law of our country is based on the object of crime to classify the crime, most of the domestic scholars focus on the constitutive elements of the individual crime when studying the crime of forgery. There is very few systematic research on forgery. This paper makes a deep analysis of forgery in our criminal law in order to have a positive influence on the legislation and judicial practice of our country. In the introduction part, the author mainly explains the reason, background and writing meaning of the topic. In addition to the introduction, the text of this paper is divided into four parts, about 40,000 words. The first part is an overview of forgery in our criminal law. In this part, the author first introduces the etymology of forgery, the historical origin of forgery and the relevant legislative provisions on forgery in ancient China. Taking the concept of behavior in criminal law as the starting point, the meaning and essence of forgery in current criminal law of our country are elicited. The second part is the object and punishment characteristics of forgery in our criminal law. This part is one of the emphases of the article. The author defines the object from two aspects: attribute and scope. The author thinks that the attribute of forgery in criminal law of our country should be "social public credit" and "real existence", the scope of which is mainly limited to four categories: currency, negotiable securities, documents and seals. This paper analyzes the penalty of forgery in criminal law with "enough to make ordinary people think that it is true and effective" and "seriously affects the social order". The third part is the basic types of forgery in our criminal law. In this part, the author classifies forgery according to different standards. First of all. Based on production authority, forgery is divided into tangible forgery and intangible forgery, in which tangible forgery includes tangible forgery and tangible alteration in narrow sense. Intangible forgery includes intangible forgery and intangible alteration in narrow sense. Secondly, forgery is divided into forgery, alteration and unauthorized manufacture based on behavior. The 4th part is the legislative perfection of the forgery crime in the criminal law of our country. Based on the discussion above, the author puts the foothold of this article on the legislative perfection of the forgery crime. First of all. The author analyzes the current legislative situation of the forgery crime in our criminal law, mainly expounds the current legislative style, behavior object and behavior mode of the forgery crime. And then put forward their own little suggestions for improvement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳興良;不以騙取稅款為目的的虛開發(fā)票行為之定性研究——非法定目的犯的一種個案研究[J];法商研究;2004年03期

2 宋強(qiáng);我國公、私文書及其證明力之探討[J];法學(xué)評論;2004年02期

3 張博;;淺議偽造犯罪的概念[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2008年07期

4 張明楷;;商品經(jīng)濟(jì)與經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪[J];中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;1991年04期

5 熊永明,胡祥福;偽造文書罪基本觀念的新倡導(dǎo)[J];河北法學(xué);2005年02期

6 周光權(quán);行為評價機(jī)制與犯罪成立——對犯罪構(gòu)成理論的擴(kuò)展性思考[J];法學(xué)研究;2000年03期

7 劉華;票據(jù)犯罪若干問題研究[J];法學(xué)研究;2000年06期

8 顧肖榮;;試論偽造、變造公文、證件、印章罪的侵犯客體[J];法學(xué)研究;1985年05期

9 羅麗,黎宏;論我國刑法中的“偽造”[J];人民檢察;2001年09期

10 熊永明;論刑法中的無形偽造——以文書為視角[J];法學(xué)論壇;2005年03期

本文編號：1471902