本文關(guān)鍵詞： 被害人承諾 錯誤 自主決定權(quán)　出處：《南昌大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：被害人承諾作為當(dāng)今最主要的超法規(guī)之排除犯罪性事由,日益受到中外刑法學(xué)者的重視,對被害人承諾的研究無論從深度還是廣度上都有了極大的發(fā)展,也產(chǎn)生了諸多的爭議,關(guān)于被害人承諾之錯誤問題就是其中最具爭議性的議題之一。被害人承諾錯誤問題研究的核心即在錯誤承諾時,承諾的效力如何?要回答這個問題,首先就得界定何為被害人承諾之錯誤,然后再對現(xiàn)有的承諾錯誤理論進行深入分析、研究,以期得到一個合理的回答,而這也是本文的行文脈絡(luò)。文章主要分為三個部分,從闡述被害人承諾錯誤的基本含義為出發(fā)點,在剖析目前國內(nèi)外在此方面的研究現(xiàn)狀的基礎(chǔ)上,繼而提出了自己在此問題上的若干看法。第一部分先界定了被害人承諾錯誤的概念,接著在分析國內(nèi)外學(xué)者對錯誤承諾分類的基礎(chǔ)上提出了自己若干看法,最后闡述了該問題研究的價值。第二部分深入剖析了被害人承諾錯誤理論的研究現(xiàn)狀,從大陸法系的“全面無效說”、“法益錯誤說”及“新全面無效說”等系統(tǒng)理論到英美法系及我國在分類基礎(chǔ)上的個別化判斷,再到本人對此問題的看法即“新法益錯誤說”的提出。第三部分是文章的重點內(nèi)容,著重分析了“新法益錯誤說”理論的基本內(nèi)容,主要是以自主決定權(quán)為主線,依次探討了自主決定權(quán)的含義、侵害自主決定權(quán)的判斷基準(zhǔn)等問題。在這部分的最后,結(jié)合承諾錯誤的分類對侵害自主決定權(quán)判斷基準(zhǔn)進行司法運用。
[Abstract]:As the most important reason for the elimination of crime, victim commitment has been paid more and more attention by Chinese and foreign criminal law scholars. The research on victim commitment has been greatly developed both in depth and breadth. There is also a lot of controversy about the error of victim commitment is one of the most controversial issues. The core of the study of the error of victim commitment is the effectiveness of the commitment in the case of false commitment. In order to answer this question, we must first define what is the fault of the victim's commitment, and then deeply analyze and study the existing commitment error theory in order to get a reasonable answer. This is also the context of this article. The article is mainly divided into three parts, from the basic meaning of the victim commitment error as the starting point, in the analysis of the current domestic and foreign research in this area on the basis of. The first part defines the concept of victim commitment error, and then puts forward some views on the basis of the analysis of domestic and foreign scholars on the classification of false commitment. In the second part, the author deeply analyzes the research status of the theory of the victim's commitment error, from the perspective of "total invalidity" in the civil law system. The systematic theories such as "the theory of legal interest error" and "the theory of new total invalidity" have been applied to the individualized judgment of Anglo-American law system and our country on the basis of classification. The third part is the focus of the article, focusing on the analysis of the basic content of the theory. Mainly taking the independent decision as the main line, this paper discusses the meaning of the independent decision in turn, the judgment standard of the infringement of the independent decision, and so on. At the end of this part. Combined with the classification of commitment errors, the judicial application of the judgment standard of infringement of independent decision is carried out.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D924

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 楊立新;劉召成;;論作為抽象人格權(quán)的自我決定權(quán)[J];學(xué)海;2010年05期

2 熊永明;;論自我決定權(quán)在器官移植中的行使邊界[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年01期

3 黎宏;;被害人承諾問題研究[J];法學(xué)研究;2007年01期

4 郭理蓉;被害人承諾與認(rèn)識錯誤[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(法學(xué)版);2003年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張若然;論刑法中的被害人同意[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：1470720