本文關(guān)鍵詞： 刑法修正案 醫(yī)鬧 聚眾擾亂社會秩序罪 解決機制　出處：《鄭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：近幾年,隨著醫(yī)鬧事件的不斷發(fā)生,醫(yī)方與患者方之間的矛盾也在不斷加深。醫(yī)患之間的矛盾已經(jīng)影響了人們的生活、社會的發(fā)展。第十二屆全國人民代表大會常務(wù)委員會通過《刑法修正案(九)》,對刑法第二百九十條第一款進行了修改,“醫(yī)鬧入刑”一時間成為社會各界熱議的話題,“醫(yī)鬧型聚眾擾亂社會秩序犯罪”也成為法律界討論的重點。對于醫(yī)鬧型聚眾擾亂社會秩序犯罪,我們應(yīng)當(dāng)進一步明確罪與非罪的界限,提出醫(yī)鬧型聚眾擾亂社會秩序犯犯罪與其他犯罪發(fā)生競合時的處理辦法。并且通過構(gòu)建更加成熟的醫(yī)療體制和醫(yī)療糾紛解決機制,讓醫(yī)患之間的關(guān)系得以改善,努力營造和諧的醫(yī)療氛圍。此文的主要研究目的在于明確醫(yī)鬧型聚眾擾亂社會秩序犯罪入罪的前提條件。因為在我國的司法實踐中對于這一問題不同法官可能有不同的認(rèn)知,實踐中出現(xiàn)同案不同判的情況也是非常有可能的。這不僅僅給當(dāng)事人帶來不合理的判決結(jié)果,同時也大大減損了司法的公正性,削弱了法律的公信力,造成了不良的社會后果。為了更好地明確此類犯罪入罪的前提條件,論文系統(tǒng)分析了若干構(gòu)罪要素,包括情節(jié)要素、主體要素、主觀方面要素、客體要素、客觀方面要素等。通過分析整理這些要素,同時研究醫(yī)鬧型聚眾擾亂社會秩序犯罪與其他犯罪發(fā)生競合時的處理辦法,進一步明確醫(yī)鬧行為的入罪標(biāo)準(zhǔn),為今后有關(guān)司法實踐提供解決思路。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the continuous occurrence of medical incidents, the contradictions between doctors and patients are also deepening. The contradictions between doctors and patients have affected people's lives. The standing Committee of the 12th National people's Congress adopted the Amendment to the Criminal Law (9) and amended the first paragraph of Article 290th of the Criminal Law. "Medical crime" has become a hot topic in all circles of the society for a time, and "medical-noisy crowd to disrupt social order crime" has also become the focus of discussion in the legal profession, and for the medical-noisy group to disrupt the social order crime. We should further clarify the line between crime and non-crime. The author puts forward the methods to deal with the conflict between crime and other crimes, and by constructing a more mature medical system and medical dispute resolution mechanism, the relationship between doctors and patients can be improved. Try to create a harmonious medical atmosphere. The main purpose of this paper is to make clear the premise of criminal conviction of the medical crowd to disturb the social order. Because in our country's judicial practice, there may be different judges on this issue. Different perceptions. In practice, it is also very possible to have different judgments in the same case. This not only brings unreasonable results to the parties, but also greatly detracts from the fairness of the judiciary and weakens the credibility of the law. In order to better understand the premise of such crimes, the paper systematically analyzes a number of elements of crime, including plot elements, subject elements, subjective elements, object elements. Through the analysis and arrangement of these elements, the author also studies the treatment methods when the crime of medical agglomeration disturbs the social order and other crimes, and further clarifies the standard of the incrimination of the medical noisy behavior. To provide solutions for the future judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.3

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 周寧;醫(yī)鬧行為的刑法規(guī)制研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2017年

，

本文編號：1468472