發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-25 09:15

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 共同犯罪 望風(fēng)行為 性質(zhì) 正犯 共同正犯　出處：《中國青年政治學(xué)院》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：望風(fēng)行為是一種十分常見的共同犯罪行為樣態(tài),一般指的是為正在進(jìn)行的犯罪活動觀察風(fēng)頭動靜�，F(xiàn)實(shí)中的望風(fēng)行為具有復(fù)雜性,行為方式各異。不同的情況下,共同犯罪中的望風(fēng)行為可能表現(xiàn)為幫助行為,也可能表現(xiàn)為正犯行為。由于共同犯罪立法體例的緣故,對望風(fēng)行為的性質(zhì)的界定問題在我國并未得到重視。我國理論、實(shí)踐往往過于重視依靠行為在犯罪中的作用來判定刑罰。這種做法可能會存在規(guī)范問題為刑罰所取代、難以面對復(fù)雜的望風(fēng)情形等等隱患。本文堅(jiān)持,我國在認(rèn)定望風(fēng)行為時(shí),應(yīng)分階段進(jìn)行,先決定性質(zhì)再決定刑罰,這種處理方式將利于更科學(xué)、準(zhǔn)確地對望風(fēng)行為進(jìn)行定罪量刑。本文主要從以下幾個(gè)方面展開:引言主要交待了選題的原因及意義。文章第一部分,界定望風(fēng)行為的含義和類型。文章第二部分,比較研究各國(地區(qū))司法實(shí)務(wù)在望風(fēng)行為的性質(zhì)認(rèn)定問題上的做法。通過研究發(fā)現(xiàn)我國司法實(shí)踐不重視對望風(fēng)行為的性質(zhì)的認(rèn)定。我國司法活動中忽略對共同犯罪行為的定性,過度依據(jù)其作用科處刑罰的做法存在危害,應(yīng)在司法中重視望風(fēng)行為的性質(zhì)的問題。文章第三部分,梳理主要國家(地區(qū))共同犯罪的立法。通過對立法的梳理發(fā)現(xiàn)目前主要存在單一的正犯體系與二元犯罪參與體系;各國(地區(qū))關(guān)于正犯的概念的重視態(tài)度各有不同,在判斷望風(fēng)行為性質(zhì)時(shí)也存在不同做法。我國立法存在單一正犯體系與二元犯罪參與體系之爭;對于我國共同犯罪人分類方法體例也存在多種說法,通說的解釋存在隱患。文章第四部分,概述望風(fēng)行為性質(zhì)判斷相關(guān)的共同犯罪基礎(chǔ)理論并表明本文的基本立場。當(dāng)今各國(地區(qū))在望風(fēng)行為性質(zhì)認(rèn)定這一具體共同犯罪問題處理時(shí)主要有主觀說、客觀說、折衷說這三種判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn),本文對這三種標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行了評述。總結(jié)了判斷望風(fēng)行為時(shí)的普遍思路并提出自己的思考。文章第五部分,重點(diǎn)研究望風(fēng)行為成立共同正犯行為的可能性�？偨Y(jié)成立望風(fēng)行為的性質(zhì)存在多種可能,但本文重點(diǎn)研究望風(fēng)行為成立共同正犯的可能性。其中內(nèi)容包括共同正犯相關(guān)的概念厘清、成立共同正犯行為的基本條件及特殊的共同正犯類型。
[Abstract]:Lookout behavior is a very common joint criminal behavior behavior, generally refers to the ongoing criminal activities to observe the momentum of the movement. In reality, lookout behavior is complex. Different ways of conduct. Under different circumstances, the lookout behavior in the joint crime may be manifested in the act of helping, or the behavior of the principal offender, as a result of the legislative style of the joint crime. No attention has been paid to the definition of the nature of lookout behavior in China. Practice often pays too much attention to rely on the role of behavior in the crime to determine the penalty. This practice may exist the normative problem is replaced by the penalty, difficult to face the complex lookout situation and other hidden dangers. In determining the behavior of lookout, our country should proceed in stages and decide the nature before deciding the penalty. This kind of treatment will be more scientific. This paper mainly from the following aspects: the introduction mainly explains the reasons and significance of the topic. The first part of the article. Define the meaning and types of lookout behavior. Part two. Comparative study of countries (regions). Judicial practice in the nature of lookout behavior approach. Through the study found that our judicial practice does not attach importance to the nature of lookout behavior. Our judicial activities ignore the characterization of joint criminal acts. The practice of excessive punishment according to its role is harmful. We should pay attention to the nature of lookout behavior in the administration of justice. The third part of the article. Combing the legislation of common crime in the main countries (regions). Through combing the legislation, it is found that there is a single principal offender system and a dual criminal participation system. Different countries (regions) pay different attention to the concept of principal offender, and there are different ways to judge the nature of lookout behavior. There is a dispute between single principal offender system and dual criminal participation system in our legislation; For the classification of joint offenders in our country there are also a variety of statements, general explanation of the existence of hidden dangers. Part 4th of the article. This paper summarizes the basic theory of joint crime related to the nature of lookout behavior and shows the basic position of this paper. Nowadays countries (regions) mainly have subjective theory in dealing with the specific joint crime problem when determining the nature of lookout behavior. Objectively speaking, eclectic theory of these three criteria, this paper reviews the three criteria, summarizes the general thinking in judging the behavior of lookout, and puts forward his own thinking. Part 5th of the article. This paper focuses on the possibility of establishing joint principal offender behavior of lookout behavior. There are many possibilities to sum up the nature of established lookout behavior. However, this paper focuses on the possibility of establishing a joint principal offender in lookout behavior, including the clarification of the related concepts of the joint principal offender, the basic conditions of establishing the joint principal offender act and the special types of joint principal offender.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國青年政治學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D914

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 高漢成;;《大清刑律草案》立法宗旨的歷史錯(cuò)位[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2006年04期

2 趙輝;;略論組織犯的存在范圍[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年06期

3 江溯;;單一正犯體系研究[J];刑事法評論;2009年01期

4 劉洪;;我國刑法共犯參與體系性質(zhì)探討——從統(tǒng)一正犯視野[J];政法學(xué)刊;2007年04期

，

本文編號：1462543