本文關(guān)鍵詞： 犯罪收益處理制度 追繳 責(zé)令退賠 沒(méi)收　出處：《寧波大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：刑事案件犯罪收益的處理是一個(gè)極其復(fù)雜而重要的論題,法律依據(jù)欠缺、研究不足以及司法實(shí)踐的混亂要求我們給予這個(gè)問(wèn)題更多的關(guān)注和重視。由于我國(guó)刑法中的刑事案件犯罪收益制度主要規(guī)定于《刑法》第64條以及新修改的《刑事訴訟法》相關(guān)法條,故本文相關(guān)研究主要圍繞上述法律法規(guī)展開。同時(shí),本文結(jié)合穿插較多實(shí)踐中的真實(shí)案例,緊密聯(lián)系司法實(shí)踐中亟待解決的問(wèn)題,并借探討刑事案件犯罪收益制度的機(jī)會(huì),嘗試對(duì)刑法與民法、實(shí)體法與程序法的聯(lián)系進(jìn)行論述,對(duì)刑事案件犯罪收益制度進(jìn)行多角度的研究。通過(guò)對(duì)刑事案件犯罪收益的概念進(jìn)行界定,并明確犯罪收益的法定范圍,以便確切理解刑事案件犯罪收益處理制度的內(nèi)涵,并對(duì)刑事案件犯罪收益處理制度的積極價(jià)值進(jìn)行了闡述。鑒于《刑法》第64條規(guī)定的“追繳”、“責(zé)令退賠”、“沒(méi)收”三者在語(yǔ)義和性質(zhì)上容易混淆,筆者對(duì)沒(méi)收、追繳、責(zé)令退賠三者的定義、適用對(duì)象、行使主體進(jìn)行了界定,同時(shí)將三者之間以及與相近概念之間容易混淆點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了梳理。刑事案件犯罪收益處理制度在司法實(shí)踐的三個(gè)領(lǐng)域中均存在很多問(wèn)題,這些問(wèn)題反映在法律文書制作與表述、司法程序、實(shí)體處理等多方面,阻礙了刑事案件犯罪收益處理制度的構(gòu)建。在程序方面本文主張通過(guò)構(gòu)建刑事案件犯罪收益處理司法審查機(jī)制、設(shè)計(jì)被害人合法財(cái)產(chǎn)發(fā)還機(jī)制、增設(shè)庭審中對(duì)犯罪收益的調(diào)查處理程序以及建立犯罪收益處理的救濟(jì)制度,構(gòu)建刑事案件犯罪收益處理的正當(dāng)程序。在實(shí)體方面結(jié)合多個(gè)具體案例,展開對(duì)犯罪收益實(shí)體處理問(wèn)題的思考,首先,從刑法的謙抑性、民法的連帶責(zé)任對(duì)刑法的啟示以及刑法相對(duì)民法的獨(dú)立性三方面論述了共同犯罪與連累犯罪中犯罪收益的處理問(wèn)題;其次,罰金刑幅度的適當(dāng)調(diào)整在實(shí)踐中的具體應(yīng)用及對(duì)犯罪收益處理的積極作用;第三,擬根據(jù)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任的劃分構(gòu)建解決犯罪收益處理實(shí)踐中被害人難以確定的問(wèn)題。
[Abstract]:The handling of the proceeds of crime in criminal cases is an extremely complex and important topic, and the legal basis is lacking. Lack of research and confusion in judicial practice require us to pay more attention to this issue. Because the proceeds of crime system in criminal cases in our criminal law is mainly stipulated in article 64 of the criminal law and the newly amended <. The relevant articles of the Code of Criminal procedure. Therefore, this paper mainly focuses on the above laws and regulations. At the same time, this paper combines with more real cases in practice, closely related to the problems to be solved in judicial practice. And by discussing the system of criminal proceeds, this paper tries to discuss the relationship between criminal law and civil law, substantive law and procedural law. By defining the concept of proceeds of crime in criminal cases and defining the legal scope of the proceeds of crime, this paper makes a multi-angle study on the system of proceeds of crime in criminal cases. In order to understand the connotation of the criminal case proceeds of crime system, and to explain the positive value of the system of handling the proceeds of crime in criminal cases, in view of the "recovery" stipulated in Article 64 of the Criminal Law. It is easy to confuse the meaning and nature of "order to return and indemnity" and "confiscation". The author defines the definition of confiscation, recovery, order and compensation, the applicable object and the subject of exercise. At the same time, there are many problems in the system of dealing with the proceeds of crime in criminal cases in the three fields of judicial practice. These problems are reflected in the production and expression of legal documents, judicial procedures, substantive handling and so on. In the aspect of procedure, this paper proposes to design a mechanism for the return of victims' legitimate property by constructing a judicial review mechanism for dealing with the proceeds of crime in criminal cases. In addition to the trial of the investigation of the proceeds of crime processing procedures and the establishment of the proceeds of crime to deal with the relief system, the construction of criminal cases of the proceeds of crime processing due process, in the substantive aspects of the combination of a number of specific cases. First of all, from the point of view of modesty of criminal law, the author thinks about how to deal with the problem of crime proceeds entity. The enlightenment of joint and several liability of civil law to criminal law and the independence of criminal law relative to civil law discuss how to deal with the proceeds of crime in joint crime and connected crime. Secondly, the appropriate adjustment of the range of fine penalty in the practice of the specific application and the positive role of dealing with the proceeds of crime; Thirdly, according to the division of fault liability, to solve the problem that the victim is difficult to determine in the practice of dealing with the proceeds of crime.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D924

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 王莉;;刑法中特別沒(méi)收之性質(zhì)[J];湖南科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年11期

2 聶生奎;;試析檢察機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)違法所得的規(guī)范處理[J];人民檢察;2011年18期

3 孫良國(guó);;賄賂治理的理想與賄賂追征的計(jì)算[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2012年07期

，

本文編號(hào)：1462000