【摘要】：香港高度自治權(quán)源于中央的授權(quán),其行使應(yīng)當(dāng)依照香港基本法的規(guī)定,不得超過應(yīng)有的限度。這是高度自治權(quán)應(yīng)有之義。但是在實(shí)踐中,高度自治權(quán)限度存在爭議的事例仍然存在。這在客觀上是由于基本法不可能包羅萬象,存在規(guī)定含糊的地方;在主觀上是由于沒看清高度自治權(quán)的本質(zhì),對于“一國兩制”基本方針沒全面把握,致使對高度自治權(quán)的界限不明晰,引發(fā)高度自治權(quán)行使的爭議。中央享有對香港特區(qū)的完全主權(quán),主權(quán)事務(wù)應(yīng)當(dāng)由中央管治。在這個(gè)前提之下,如何充分發(fā)揮高度自治權(quán)的自主性與積極性是個(gè)重要的命題。規(guī)范高度自治權(quán)在應(yīng)有限度內(nèi)行使,需要遵循“一國兩制”的精神和基本法的目的,完善基本法規(guī)范,促進(jìn)基本法適用,從高度自治權(quán)的內(nèi)部進(jìn)行規(guī)范,發(fā)揮社會(huì)監(jiān)督的力量,讓高度自治權(quán)從內(nèi)容、程序和監(jiān)督上都能有較好的規(guī)范。在合理限度內(nèi)行使高度自治權(quán)才能真正保障國家的主權(quán)統(tǒng)一和領(lǐng)土完整,保持香港的繁榮和穩(wěn)定。
[Abstract]:The high degree of autonomy of Hong Kong originates from the authorization of the Central people's Government, and its exercise shall not exceed the due limit in accordance with the provisions of the basic Law of Hong Kong. This is the meaning of a high degree of autonomy. However, in practice, there are still controversial cases of high degree of autonomy. This is objectively due to the fact that the basic Law cannot be all-inclusive and there are vague provisions; subjectively, it is due to the lack of a clear understanding of the nature of a high degree of autonomy and the lack of a comprehensive grasp of the basic principle of "one country, two systems", resulting in unclear boundaries for a high degree of autonomy, which leads to disputes over the exercise of a high degree of autonomy. The Central people's Government has full sovereignty over the Hong Kong Special Administrative region, and sovereign affairs should be governed by the Central people's Government. Under this premise, how to give full play to the autonomy and enthusiasm of a high degree of autonomy is an important proposition. It is necessary to follow the spirit of "one country, two systems" and the purpose of the basic Law, improve the norms of the basic Law, promote the application of the basic Law, standardize from within the high degree of autonomy, give full play to the power of social supervision, and enable a high degree of autonomy to have better norms in terms of content, procedures, and supervision. Only by exercising a high degree of autonomy within a reasonable limit can we truly safeguard the sovereign unity and territorial integrity of the country and maintain the prosperity and stability of Hong Kong.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D921.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蕭蔚云;論一國兩制下中央與香港特別行政區(qū)的法律關(guān)系[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1991年04期

2 郭天武;陳雪珍;;論中央授權(quán)與香港特別行政區(qū)高度自治[J];當(dāng)代港澳研究;2010年02期

3 王磊;;論人大釋法與香港司法釋法的關(guān)系——紀(jì)念香港基本法實(shí)施十周年[J];法學(xué)家;2007年03期

4 程潔;;中央管治權(quán)與特區(qū)高度自治——以基本法規(guī)定的授權(quán)關(guān)系為框架[J];法學(xué);2007年08期

5 田瑤;;從“吳嘉玲案”看香港法院“違憲審查權(quán)”及其限度[J];比較法研究;2012年06期

6 吳天昊;;特別行政區(qū)高度自治權(quán):是權(quán)力而非權(quán)利[J];法學(xué);2012年12期

7 劉誠;許書詠;;中央保留原則下的《香港基本法》第23條立法[J];當(dāng)代港澳研究;2013年01期

8 秦前紅;張?bào)阗?;基于“菲傭居港權(quán)”案件判決的幾點(diǎn)反思[J];理論月刊;2014年08期

9 強(qiáng)世功;;司法主權(quán)之爭——從吳嘉玲案看“人大釋法”的憲政意涵[J];清華法學(xué);2009年05期

10 饒戈平;一國兩制中的若干法律問題[J];中外法學(xué);1997年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 潘俊強(qiáng);論香港特別行政區(qū)高度自治權(quán)的法理基礎(chǔ)[D];中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2011年

，

本文編號：2502618