本文選題：安置房 + 房屋權(quán)屬　； 參考：《湖南大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：自上個世紀九十年代末以來,城市化進程加快而發(fā)生了大規(guī)模的集體土地的征收和國有土地上的房屋征收(俗稱拆遷)活動,導致了大量征收安置房的修建,亦產(chǎn)生了許多需要解決的法律問題。 征收安置房與一般安置房略有不同,它是基于征收行為而引發(fā)的,由政府出資或政府主導、社會出資建設(shè)的,用以保障失地農(nóng)民和城鎮(zhèn)居民的基本居住條件的社會保障房。并且,從性質(zhì)上來看,征收安置房實質(zhì)上是一種準公共產(chǎn)品,兼具了公共產(chǎn)品和私人產(chǎn)品的特征。征收安置房的類型繁多,最常見的分類是根據(jù)建設(shè)用地的性質(zhì)的不同,分為集體土地上的征收安置房和國有土地上的征收安置房兩類。其中,集體土地上的征收安置房是目前爭議最大的一類安置房。 具體來說,由于房屋權(quán)屬界定不清、土地權(quán)屬差異和房屋本身的性質(zhì)存在爭議,實務操作中出現(xiàn)了許多有待解決的法律問題。具體包括：征收安置房的權(quán)屬問題、征收安置房土地的權(quán)屬問題和征收安置房的交易問題等。發(fā)現(xiàn)征收安置房的所有權(quán)并不完整,征收安置房的土地不能采用集體土地以及征收安置房的交易急需規(guī)引等。解決安置房權(quán)屬問題的思路和解決安置房用地的思路是互相聯(lián)系的,必須使用國有土地建設(shè)安置房并確保安置房產(chǎn)權(quán)完整。解決安置房權(quán)屬問題和安置房用地問題為安置房交易問題提供了基礎(chǔ),在使用國有土地建房和保證房屋產(chǎn)權(quán)明晰的前提下,政府應當適當干預安置房交易市場,并制定科學的法律規(guī)則對交易進行規(guī)引,并且,交易雙方必須理性對待此類房屋交易問題。
[Abstract]:Since the late 1990s, the acceleration of urbanization has led to the large-scale expropriation of collective land and the expropriation of houses on state-owned land (commonly referred to as demolition and relocation), which has led to the construction of a large number of expropriated and resettled houses. There are also many legal problems that need to be solved. The expropriation house is slightly different from the general house, which is caused by the expropriation behavior, financed by the government or led by the government, and constructed by the society, which is used to guarantee the basic living conditions of the landless peasants and the urban residents. Moreover, in nature, the rehousing is a kind of quasi-public goods, which has the characteristics of public goods and private goods. There are many types of rehousing, the most common classification is according to the nature of the construction land, divided into collective land on the expropriation of resettlement houses and state-owned land on the expropriation of two types of resettlement houses. Among them, collective land on the expropriation of housing is the most controversial type of housing. Specifically, due to the unclear definition of housing ownership, the difference of land ownership and the nature of the house itself, there are many legal problems to be solved in practical operation. It includes: the ownership of the house, the ownership of the land and the transaction of the house. It is found that the ownership of the rehousing is not complete, the land of the rehousing can not be taken collective land and the transaction of the expropriation of the resettlement house is in urgent need of regulation and so on. The idea of solving the problem of the property right of the resettlement house and the idea of solving the land for the resettlement house are interrelated, so we must use the state-owned land to build the resettlement house and ensure the integrity of the property right of the house. The settlement of the problem of the ownership of rehousing and the issue of land use for rehousing provide the basis for the transaction of rehousing. On the premise of using state-owned land to build houses and to ensure the clarity of property rights of housing, the government should intervene appropriately in the market for rehousing transactions. Moreover, both parties must deal with this kind of housing transaction rationally.
【學位授予單位】：湖南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D921;D922.3;D923.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 屈茂輝;張彪;章小兵;;產(chǎn)權(quán)概念的經(jīng)濟學與法學比較[J];安徽廣播電視大學學報;2005年04期

2 馬俊駒,宋剛;合作制與集體所有權(quán)[J];法學研究;2001年06期

3 屈茂輝;;不動產(chǎn)登記申請的法理與規(guī)則[J];法學研究;2007年02期

4 申衛(wèi)星;;從《物權(quán)法》看物權(quán)登記制度[J];國家檢察官學院學報;2007年03期

5 王軼;民法價值判斷問題的實體性論證規(guī)則——以中國民法學的學術(shù)實踐為背景[J];中國社會科學;2004年06期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 盧天嬌;[N];廈門日報;2007年

，

本文編號：1947200