發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-24 15:21

  本文選題：劃撥土地使用權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：抵押　出處：《遼寧大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：劃撥土地使用權(quán)市場(chǎng)化的優(yōu)勢(shì)在于使土地得到優(yōu)化配置，并充分發(fā)揮土地的經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)效用，可以使土地得到充分的利用。另一方面劃撥土地使用權(quán)市場(chǎng)化也可以幫助來(lái)建立統(tǒng)一的土地市場(chǎng)。我國(guó)劃撥土地使用權(quán)市場(chǎng)化有轉(zhuǎn)讓、出租、抵押、授權(quán)經(jīng)營(yíng)等幾種形式。劃撥土地使用權(quán)抵押的立法變化經(jīng)歷了一個(gè)從嚴(yán)格到寬松的過(guò)程。目前，我國(guó)關(guān)于劃撥土地使用權(quán)抵押的現(xiàn)行規(guī)定并不完善，在劃撥土地使用權(quán)抵押設(shè)定的類型、效力等方面規(guī)定也并不完備，在實(shí)踐中存在一系列的問(wèn)題。本文中提出劃撥土地使用權(quán)抵押現(xiàn)實(shí)存在的問(wèn)題：首先，公益性劃撥土地使用權(quán)是否能夠抵押并未作出嚴(yán)格界定。其次，劃撥土司使用權(quán)在價(jià)格確定過(guò)程中存在一系列問(wèn)題。第三，破產(chǎn)程序中地方政府不規(guī)范收儲(chǔ)劃撥土地的使用權(quán)。第四，法院與土地管理部門存在沖突。第五，房產(chǎn)地產(chǎn)登記部門分離也引起一系列的麻煩。 根據(jù)以上存在的現(xiàn)實(shí)問(wèn)題提出一系列建議，以求在未來(lái)的立法中明確相關(guān)規(guī)定：首先，應(yīng)當(dāng)明確區(qū)分公益性劃撥土地與經(jīng)營(yíng)性劃撥土地，并確定公益性劃撥土地不應(yīng)進(jìn)行抵押。其次，要規(guī)范劃撥土地使用權(quán)抵押設(shè)立的價(jià)格立法，并對(duì)不按照國(guó)家規(guī)定確定土地價(jià)格的行為予以處罰。第三，完善地方政府的土地儲(chǔ)備行為，明確公共利益應(yīng)如何界定以及破產(chǎn)企業(yè)劃撥土地使用權(quán)抵押權(quán)能否就工業(yè)用地變更為商業(yè)用地的預(yù)期增值的部分來(lái)受償。第四，，抵押權(quán)的實(shí)現(xiàn)過(guò)程中法院應(yīng)與相關(guān)部門良好溝通，以求維護(hù)法院裁定的有效性,有效地維護(hù)當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)益。第五，構(gòu)建不動(dòng)產(chǎn)統(tǒng)一登記制度，保護(hù)相關(guān)交易安全性。只有對(duì)以上制度做出明確的規(guī)定，才能使劃撥土地使用權(quán)抵押的相關(guān)立法更加完備。
[Abstract]:The advantage of marketization of allocated land use right lies in optimizing the allocation of land and giving full play to the economic and social utility of land. It can make full use of land. On the other hand, the marketization of allocated land use rights can also help to establish a unified land market. The legislative changes in the mortgage of the allocated land use right have gone through a process from strict to lenient. At present, the current provisions on the mortgage of the allocated land use right in China are not perfect. There are a series of problems in the practice. This paper puts forward the problems in the reality of the mortgage of the right to use the allocated land: first of all, there are some problems in the reality of the mortgage of the right to use the allocated land: first of all, there are a series of problems in the practice. Whether the right to use the land allocated for public welfare can be mortgaged has not been strictly defined. Secondly, there are a series of problems in the process of determining the price of the right to use allocated toast. Third, In the bankruptcy process, the local government does not regulate the right to use the land to be collected, stored and allocated. Fourth, there is a conflict between the court and the land management department. Fifth, the separation of the real estate registration department also causes a series of problems. According to the above existing practical problems, a series of suggestions are put forward in order to make clear the relevant provisions in the future legislation: first of all, we should clearly distinguish between the public welfare transfer land and the management transfer land. And determine that public welfare allocation of land should not be mortgaged. Secondly, to regulate the allocation of land use right mortgage set up the price legislation, and not in accordance with national regulations to determine the land price to punish. Third, Improve the land reserve behavior of local governments, clarify how the public interest should be defined and whether the mortgage of the right to use the land allocated by the bankrupt enterprise can be compensated for the expected increase in the value of industrial land to commercial land. Fourth, In the process of realizing mortgage, the court should communicate well with the relevant departments in order to maintain the validity of the court ruling and effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the parties. To protect the security of related transactions. Only by making clear regulations on the above system, can we make the relevant legislation on the mortgage of allocated land use right more complete.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D922.33

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 喬志敏;劃撥土地使用權(quán)市場(chǎng)化問(wèn)題的探討[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;1995年03期

2 王軼;;正確理解公共利益 切實(shí)維護(hù)私人權(quán)利[J];今日中國(guó)論壇;2007年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 趙賀;轉(zhuǎn)軌時(shí)期的中國(guó)城市土地利用機(jī)制研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 張正云;論我國(guó)劃撥土地使用權(quán)制度的完善[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年

2 柴華;我國(guó)城市建設(shè)用地使用權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)制度的研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年

3 曹裕霖;劃撥土地使用權(quán)法律問(wèn)題研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2007年

4 邵志華;完善我國(guó)劃撥土地使用權(quán)法律制度研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2006年

5 秦建培;劃撥土地使用權(quán)市場(chǎng)化法律問(wèn)題探討[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：1658875