【摘要】：親子關(guān)系的否認(rèn)訴訟是親子法領(lǐng)域中確定父母子女身份關(guān)系的一種非常重要的訴訟程序。我國學(xué)界對親子關(guān)系否認(rèn)訴訟的認(rèn)識(shí)不夠成熟，現(xiàn)行《婚姻法》也沒有對這一訴訟作出明確規(guī)定，只是在2011年8月施行的《婚姻法解釋（三）》中的第2條對其作出了原則性的解釋，缺乏可操作性，這使得親子法的內(nèi)容與結(jié)構(gòu)存在重大缺陷。筆者以“親子關(guān)系否認(rèn)訴訟研究”為論題，從民事訴訟法的角度，結(jié)合實(shí)體法的有關(guān)規(guī)定，對親子關(guān)系否認(rèn)訴訟的內(nèi)涵與性質(zhì)、婚生子女的推定、當(dāng)事人適格、訴權(quán)、親子鑒定等理論與實(shí)務(wù)問題分別進(jìn)行了研討，借鑒我國臺(tái)灣地區(qū)及域外法對這一訴訟的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)，在比較法研究的基礎(chǔ)上，提出并論證了完善我國親子關(guān)系否認(rèn)訴訟的立法建議。 本文除引言和結(jié)語外，正文分為五個(gè)部分，共計(jì)28000余字。 第一部分是親子關(guān)系否認(rèn)訴訟概述。對親子關(guān)系否認(rèn)訴訟的內(nèi)涵、婚生子女的推定、親子關(guān)系否認(rèn)訴訟的性質(zhì)等內(nèi)容進(jìn)行闡釋，從而論證親子關(guān)系否認(rèn)訴訟存在的法理基礎(chǔ)。 第二部分是親子關(guān)系否認(rèn)訴訟的當(dāng)事人適格。借鑒我國臺(tái)灣地區(qū)以及域外的相關(guān)法律規(guī)定，，探討了夫、妻、子女、生父、繼承權(quán)受侵害的第三人的原告適格問題以及被告適格問題。 第三部分是親子關(guān)系否認(rèn)訴訟中的親子鑒定。闡明親子鑒定的適用原則，結(jié)合親子鑒定程序中的檢查協(xié)助義務(wù)的含義，闡述親子鑒定可否強(qiáng)制進(jìn)行以及當(dāng)事人拒絕鑒定的法律后果，提出嚴(yán)格限制親子鑒定的范圍、加強(qiáng)鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)的監(jiān)管、規(guī)定出具鑒定報(bào)告前的復(fù)核制度等針對親子鑒定的完善建議。 第四部分是親子關(guān)系否認(rèn)權(quán)的消滅。在借鑒我國臺(tái)灣地區(qū)及域外的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)及前人研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上，論證了起訴期間經(jīng)過、子女死亡、夫同意承認(rèn)子女為婚生的三種情況下親子關(guān)系否認(rèn)權(quán)是否消滅的問題。 第五部分是我國親子關(guān)系否認(rèn)訴訟的立法思考。從明確界定否認(rèn)權(quán)人的范圍、否認(rèn)權(quán)行使的條件、親子關(guān)系否認(rèn)訴訟的程序、否認(rèn)權(quán)消滅的時(shí)效等四個(gè)方面提出并論證了完善我國親子關(guān)系否認(rèn)訴訟的立法建議。
[Abstract]:The denial lawsuit of parent-child relationship is a very important procedure to determine the identity relationship between parents and children in the field of parent-child law. The academic circles of our country are not mature enough to deny the lawsuit of parent-child relationship, and the current Marriage Law has not made a clear provision on this lawsuit. It is only in Article 2 of the interpretation of Marriage Law (3), which came into effect in August 2011, that it is explained in principle and lacks maneuverability, which makes the content and structure of parent-child law have great defects. The author takes "the study of parent-child relationship denial litigation" as the topic, from the point of view of civil procedure law, combined with the relevant provisions of substantive law, denies the connotation and nature of the lawsuit, the presumption of children born in wedlock, the appropriateness of the parties, and the right to sue. This paper discusses the theoretical and practical issues such as paternity testing, draws lessons from the legislative experience of Taiwan and foreign laws in this lawsuit, and on the basis of comparative law research, This paper puts forward and demonstrates the legislative suggestions to perfect the parent-child relationship denial litigation in our country. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the main body is divided into five parts, a total of more than 28000 words. The first part is an overview of parent-child relationship denial litigation. This paper explains the connotation of parent-child relationship denial litigation, the inference of children born in wedlock, and the nature of parent-child relationship denial litigation, so as to demonstrate the legal basis of parent-child relationship denial litigation. The second part is the parent-child relationship to deny the appropriateness of the litigants. Referring to the relevant legal provisions of Taiwan and other countries, this paper probes into the plaintiff suitability of husband, wife, children, biological father and third party whose inheritance rights are infringed, as well as the suitability of the defendant. The third part is the paternity test in the lawsuit of denial of paternity. This paper expounds the applicable principles of paternity testing, combined with the meaning of the obligation of examination and assistance in paternity testing procedure, expounds whether paternity testing can be compulsory and the legal consequences of the parties' refusal to do so, and puts forward that the scope of paternity testing should be strictly limited. Strengthen the supervision of appraisal institutions, stipulate the review system before the issuance of identification reports and other suggestions for the improvement of paternity testing. The fourth part is the elimination of the right of repudiation of parent-child relationship. On the basis of drawing lessons from the legislative experience of Taiwan and other countries and the previous research results, this paper demonstrates whether the right to deny the parent-child relationship is eliminated during the prosecution period when the child dies and the husband agrees to admit that the child is born in wedlock. The fifth part is the legislative thinking of denying litigation of parent-child relationship in our country. This paper puts forward and demonstrates the legislative suggestions for perfecting the negation litigation in our country from four aspects: clearly defining the scope of the negator, the conditions for the exercise of the right of denial, the procedure of denying the lawsuit of the parent-child relationship, and the limitation of the elimination of the right of denunciation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D923.9;D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 田平安;柯陽友;;民事訴權(quán)新論[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年05期

2 陳銘聰;;DNA鑒定證據(jù)于親子關(guān)系事件的適用研究——以臺(tái)灣地區(qū)法院判決分析為例[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2013年01期

3 賴紅梅;;親子鑒定訴訟中的檢查協(xié)助義務(wù)[J];河北法學(xué);2012年11期

4 賴紅梅;;親子鑒定結(jié)論在親子關(guān)系訴訟實(shí)務(wù)中的定位[J];河北法學(xué);2013年01期

5 陳瑞華;;鑒定意見的審查判斷問題[J];中國司法鑒定;2011年05期

6 張海燕;;親子關(guān)系訴訟中親子鑒定適用問題研究——兼評(píng)《婚姻法司法解釋(三)》第2條[J];山東社會(huì)科學(xué);2013年05期

7 李龍;民事訴訟當(dāng)事人適格芻論[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2000年04期

8 李龍;民事訴權(quán)論綱[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2003年02期

9 陳樝;;親子關(guān)系訴訟中的血緣鑒定之強(qiáng)制性[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2010年01期

10 田豐;;親子鑒定中婚生未成年子女權(quán)益保障探討[J];醫(yī)學(xué)與哲學(xué)(A);2013年02期

本文編號(hào)：2485063