【摘要】：2012年新《刑事訴訟法》出臺,公訴案件當(dāng)事人和解作為一項特別程序被納入其中,立足于新《刑事訴訟法》對公訴案件當(dāng)事人和解程序和制度的規(guī)定,對公訴案件當(dāng)事人和解制度的立法背景、法律規(guī)定、理論爭議焦點,特別是針對該制度實施中有可能產(chǎn)生的問題進行對策性研究,具有重要的現(xiàn)實意義。 從公訴案件當(dāng)事人和解制度的立法背景,我們可以看出公訴案件當(dāng)事人和解的入法目的以及立法宗旨,可以概括為恢復(fù)社會關(guān)系,化解社會矛盾；解決疑難案件,提高訴訟效率；保障被害人權(quán)利,促進加害人回歸社會。公訴案件當(dāng)事人和解的實體要件包括主體要件、客體要件、主觀方面和客觀方面,而公訴案件當(dāng)事人和解的程序要件主要有時機要件和確認(rèn)與生效要件,通過對這一部分的闡述力求對公訴案件當(dāng)事人和解制度的重點法律規(guī)定有大致了解,明確公訴案件當(dāng)事人和解制度的適用案件范圍、在滿足什么條件下和解才能夠達成,和解協(xié)議怎樣才能生效等。當(dāng)然,公訴案件和解并沒有因為被立法化而消除一些困惑和疑問,如賠償緣何影響刑罰,和解過程中權(quán)利濫用問題,被害人諒解是否出于真心問題……這些問題的存在使公訴案件當(dāng)事人和解制度下的刑罰適用效果大大折扣。為減少公訴案件當(dāng)事人和解適用中出現(xiàn)弊端,需要思考建立刑事被害人國家補償制度以減少經(jīng)濟因素對被害人自愿和解的干擾；和解方式多元化,正確把握賠償對量刑的影響；建立賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn),避免花錢買刑；完善監(jiān)督制度,避免權(quán)利或者權(quán)力濫用等措施。
[Abstract]:(a) the introduction of the new Code of Criminal procedure in 2012, in which reconciliation of the parties to public prosecution cases was incorporated as a special procedure, based on the provisions of the new Code of Criminal procedure on reconciliation procedures and systems for the parties to public prosecution cases, It is of great practical significance to study the legislative background, the legal provisions, the focus of theoretical disputes, especially the problems that may arise in the implementation of the system for the litigant reconciliation system of public prosecution cases. From the legislative background of the reconciliation system of the parties to public prosecution cases, we can see that the purpose and purpose of the reconciliation of the parties to the public prosecution cases can be summarized as the restoration of social relations and the resolution of social contradictions; Solve difficult cases, improve the efficiency of litigation, protect the rights of victims, promote the victim to return to society. The substantive elements of the reconciliation between the parties to the public prosecution cases include the subject elements, the object elements, the subjective aspects and the objective aspects, while the procedural elements of the reconciliation between the parties to the public prosecution cases mainly include the time elements and the confirmation and effective elements. Through the elaboration of this part, we strive to have a general understanding of the key legal provisions of the reconciliation system of the parties to public prosecution cases, and make clear the scope of the cases applicable to the reconciliation system of the parties to public prosecution cases, and under what conditions can reconciliation be achieved. How the settlement agreement will come into effect, etc. Of course, the settlement of public prosecution cases has not eliminated some puzzles and doubts because of the legislation, such as how compensation affects the penalty, the abuse of power in the reconciliation process, and whether the victim's understanding is out of genuine question. The existence of these problems greatly discounted the effect of penalty application under the settlement system of the litigants of public prosecution. In order to reduce the malpractice in the application of reconciliation between the parties to public prosecution cases, it is necessary to think about the establishment of the state compensation system for criminal victims to reduce the interference of economic factors on the voluntary reconciliation of victims, to diversify the ways of reconciliation, to correctly grasp the influence of compensation on sentencing; Establish compensation standards, avoid spending money on punishment, improve supervision system, avoid abuse of rights or powers and other measures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2
，

本文編號：2450448