刑事錯(cuò)案發(fā)現(xiàn)機(jī)制研究
[Abstract]:Under the guidance of the spirit of the third Plenary session of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, perfecting the discovery mechanism of criminal error cases in our country is an important subject in the field of law research at present, and it is also the inevitable requirement of a new round of judicial reform. Under the current judicial structure, the discovery of criminal error cases is often due to "the presence of the real perpetrator" or "the resurrection of the dead", which is an extremely accidental factor. From the point of view of judicial practice, China has not formed a mature criminal error case discovery mechanism. There are many defects in efficiency and working mechanism for a long time, which lead to the poor operation of the current mechanism and the poor practical effect. It is urgent to reform and perfect it. Therefore, it is urgent to carry out a more in-depth research on the mechanism of criminal error detection in our country. This paper analyzes the concept of criminal error case, discusses the definition standard and manifestation of criminal error case, and further clarifies the identification of criminal error case. This paper focuses on the reflection on the current criminal error case discovery mechanism in our country from the aspects of criminal appeal, protest, legal-related complaint, letter and visit, and media disclosure, and analyzes the crux of the operation of this mechanism. Through the research on the system construction and practice operation of the civil organizations and official organizations in the extraterritorial areas on the problem of finding wrong cases, the author tries to sort out the relief experience of the discovery of criminal miscases outside the territory, and hopes to enlighten the improvement of the discovery mechanism of criminal error cases in our country. On the basis of the judicial practice of our country, this paper provides a feasible solution for the mechanism of finding criminal error cases in our country. On the basis of perfecting the existing discovery mechanism, we should try new systems and practices in order to widen the channels and ways of finding wrong cases, and strive to establish an institutionalized, standardized, long-term and scientific mechanism for discovering criminal miscases. Make the discovery of the wrong case from chance to necessity.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:北京交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:D925.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 干紅光;葉林達(dá);;檢察機(jī)關(guān)刑事審判監(jiān)督實(shí)踐窘境及其突圍[J];中國司法;2008年03期
2 張敏;戴娟;;困惑與出路:轉(zhuǎn)型期法院涉訴信訪制度的理性探究[J];法律適用;2009年06期
3 張衛(wèi)平;論我國法院體制的非行政化——法院體制改革的一種基本思路[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2000年03期
4 李建國;金志鋒;;我國二審刑事抗訴制度之重構(gòu)淺探[J];法學(xué)雜志;2007年05期
5 何家弘;;刑事庭審虛化的實(shí)證研究[J];法學(xué)家;2011年06期
6 萬毅;歷史與現(xiàn)實(shí)交困中的案件請示制度[J];法學(xué);2005年02期
7 謝佑平;防止冤假錯(cuò)案,有賴于健全的刑事程序法[J];法學(xué);2005年05期
8 周永坤;錯(cuò)案追究制與法治國家建設(shè)——一個(gè)法社會學(xué)的思考[J];法學(xué);1997年09期
9 陳學(xué)權(quán);;發(fā)現(xiàn)冤案的新方法——美國定罪后DNA檢測立法及啟示[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2013年05期
10 周永坤;;信訪潮與中國糾紛解決機(jī)制的路徑選擇[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2006年01期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 李春剛;刑事錯(cuò)案基本問題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年
,本文編號:2449147
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2449147.html