新興隱私權(quán)糾紛的司法救濟(jì)與權(quán)衡
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-03-17 18:58
【摘要】：在中國(guó),隱私權(quán)的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展一直都依賴司法裁判的推動(dòng)。近十年來(lái),隨著信息技術(shù)的飛速發(fā)展,司法裁判中隱私侵權(quán)案件攀升,出現(xiàn)諸多隱私糾紛的新類型。其中,空間隱私糾紛、個(gè)人信息糾紛、網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論侵權(quán)糾紛是此類案件中爭(zhēng)議較大、較有代表性的類型。通過(guò)對(duì)案例樣本的比較分析,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)這些新興隱私權(quán)在實(shí)踐中都遭遇了不同層面的利益沖突,且在立法中尚未確立統(tǒng)一的救濟(jì)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。立法的缺位、模糊和沖突,使司法有了更多自由裁量的空間;法官在充分審視情理、政策、社會(huì)利益后所做的判決,意圖調(diào)適法律確定性和開放性之間的沖突,實(shí)則是對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)需要的"回應(yīng)"。
[Abstract]:In China, the generation and development of the right to privacy has always depended on the promotion of judicial adjudication. In recent ten years, with the rapid development of information technology, privacy infringement cases rise in judicial adjudication, and there are many new types of privacy disputes. Among them, space privacy disputes, personal information disputes, network speech infringement disputes are more controversial in such cases, more representative types. Through the comparative analysis of case samples, it can be found that these new privacy rights in practice have encountered different levels of conflict of interest, and in the legislation has not yet established a unified standard of relief. The absence of legislation, vagueness and conflict have given the judiciary more room for discretion; The judge's judgment after fully examining the reason, the policy, the social benefit, the intention to adjust the conflict between the legal certainty and the openness, is in fact a "response" to the needs of the real society.
【作者單位】： 河南大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：河南大學(xué)基本科研業(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)科研專項(xiàng)基金“中國(guó)基層法官角色研究”(zzjj20140060)階段性成果;河南大學(xué)人文社科項(xiàng)目“基層法官的角色行為與實(shí)踐”(2012YBRW001)階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1
[Abstract]:In China, the generation and development of the right to privacy has always depended on the promotion of judicial adjudication. In recent ten years, with the rapid development of information technology, privacy infringement cases rise in judicial adjudication, and there are many new types of privacy disputes. Among them, space privacy disputes, personal information disputes, network speech infringement disputes are more controversial in such cases, more representative types. Through the comparative analysis of case samples, it can be found that these new privacy rights in practice have encountered different levels of conflict of interest, and in the legislation has not yet established a unified standard of relief. The absence of legislation, vagueness and conflict have given the judiciary more room for discretion; The judge's judgment after fully examining the reason, the policy, the social benefit, the intention to adjust the conflict between the legal certainty and the openness, is in fact a "response" to the needs of the real society.
【作者單位】： 河南大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：河南大學(xué)基本科研業(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)科研專項(xiàng)基金“中國(guó)基層法官角色研究”(zzjj20140060)階段性成果;河南大學(xué)人文社科項(xiàng)目“基層法官的角色行為與實(shí)踐”(2012YBRW001)階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 王利明;;論個(gè)人信息權(quán)的法律保護(hù)——以個(gè)人信息權(quán)與隱私權(quán)的界分為中心[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2013年04期
2 王利明;;隱私權(quán)的新發(fā)展[J];人大法律評(píng)論;2009年01期
3 王利明;;隱私權(quán)內(nèi)容探討[J];浙江社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年03期
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 杜婧;;信息商業(yè)化時(shí)代的個(gè)人信息權(quán)利屬性及適用研究——以美國(guó)為研究視角[J];法制與社會(huì);2017年19期
2 陳陽(yáng);;新興隱私權(quán)糾紛的司法救濟(jì)與權(quán)衡[J];河南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2017年04期
3 曾彩霞;尤建新;;大數(shù)據(jù)壟斷對(duì)相關(guān)市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的挑戰(zhàn)與規(guī)制:基于文獻(xiàn)的研究[J];中國(guó)價(jià)格監(jiān)管與反壟斷;2017年06期
4 王超遷;;個(gè)人信息法律保護(hù)的法理學(xué)分析[J];法制博覽;2017年17期
5 王s，
本文編號(hào)：2442600
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2442600.html
最近更新
教材專著
