【摘要】：債務(wù)人異議之訴是民事執(zhí)行救濟(jì)的重要組成部分。債務(wù)人異議之訴主要是通過對執(zhí)行根據(jù)所彰顯的實(shí)體法律關(guān)系發(fā)生變化時(shí),以訴訟的方式提出抗辯,以維護(hù)自己的合法權(quán)益。縱觀大陸法系,大多數(shù)國家都確立了債務(wù)人異議之訴。雖然我國也對債務(wù)人異議之訴制度進(jìn)行了熱烈的討論,但始終沒有在立法上體現(xiàn)。我國對民事訴訟法中執(zhí)行救濟(jì)方面的修改表現(xiàn)為:當(dāng)事人和案外人可以對程序問題提出異議,而在實(shí)體救濟(jì)上,卻只規(guī)定了案外人異議之訴。所以,筆者經(jīng)過對國外以及臺(tái)灣地區(qū)的債務(wù)人異議之訴進(jìn)行闡述,希望能對我國建立債務(wù)人異議之訴提供些許建議。本文主要分為四個(gè)部分:第一部分是對債務(wù)人異議之訴的一個(gè)概述。包括對“債務(wù)人異議之訴”的定義,包括對概念、性質(zhì)、立法現(xiàn)狀的論述。第二部分主要是對域外債務(wù)人異議之訴制度的介紹,包括我國臺(tái)灣地區(qū)、德國、日本相關(guān)制度的設(shè)計(jì)程式,以及它們之間的異同點(diǎn)進(jìn)行分析。第三部分主要是從我國的國情出發(fā),分析債務(wù)人異議之訴的可行性和必要性。第四部分是借鑒外國以及臺(tái)灣地區(qū)的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn),并立足于我國的實(shí)際情況,科學(xué)合理地提出立法建議。
[Abstract]:The objection action of debtor is an important part of civil execution remedy. The debtor's objection is mainly to defend his legal rights and interests by defending his own legal rights and interests when the execution is changed according to the substantive legal relationship revealed by the debtor in the form of an action in order to defend his own legal rights and interests. Throughout the continental law system, most countries have established the debtor's objection. Although our country also has carried on the heated discussion to the debtor objection lawsuit system, but has not reflected in the legislation all the time. The modification of the remedy in the civil procedure law in our country shows that the parties and outsiders can object to the procedural problem, but the substantive relief only prescribes the objection action of the outsider in the case. Therefore, the author of the foreign and Taiwan debtors objection claims, I hope to establish a debtor objection in our country to provide some suggestions. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part is an overview of the debtor's objection. Including the definition of the debtor's objection, including the concept, nature, legislative status. The second part is mainly about the introduction of the appeal system of the foreign debtors, including the design procedures of the relevant systems in Taiwan, Germany and Japan, as well as the differences and similarities among them. The third part mainly analyzes the feasibility and necessity of the debtor's objection from the national conditions of our country. The fourth part is to draw lessons from the legislative experience of foreign countries and Taiwan, and based on the actual situation of our country, put forward the legislative proposals scientifically and reasonably.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國青年政治學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 楊春華;;論民事執(zhí)行案外人的救濟(jì)途徑[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2008年03期

2 江偉;常廷彬;;論已確認(rèn)事實(shí)的預(yù)決力[J];中國法學(xué);2008年03期

，

本文編號：2441983