【摘要】：行賄人刑事豁免制度實(shí)質(zhì)上是污點(diǎn)證人刑事豁免制度。根據(jù)日本法學(xué)家田口守—的解釋,污點(diǎn)證人刑事豁免權(quán)制度是指“根據(jù)自我歸罪特權(quán)而行使拒絕陳述權(quán)從而不能獲得證實(shí)犯罪的必要證據(jù)時(shí),對(duì)于共犯關(guān)系中一部分人免予刑事責(zé)任,使他喪失拒絕自我歸罪的特權(quán),強(qiáng)制讓他陳述,用他的陳述證明其他人有罪的制度”。污點(diǎn)證人制度內(nèi)容較為寬泛,適用于各類刑事案件訴訟,本文僅針對(duì)賄賂犯罪訴訟中行賄人的刑事豁免制度的構(gòu)建問題進(jìn)行論述。行賄人的刑事豁免制度以其自身所具有的司法價(jià)值,被世界上許多國家所采納。該項(xiàng)制度的目的是為了用有限的司法資源確保對(duì)受賄犯罪的追訴。賄賂案件的特殊性,使建立賄賂案件行賄人刑事豁免制度比該項(xiàng)制度在其他案件上的應(yīng)用有更大的價(jià)值。 本文分四部分,第一部分介紹了我國賄賂案件訴訟的現(xiàn)狀、面臨的問題,對(duì)行賄人的處理情況,造成現(xiàn)實(shí)中的困境的原因即賄賂犯罪證據(jù)的特殊性。并介紹了目前賄賂犯罪訴訟中對(duì)行賄人的處理規(guī)定以及司法實(shí)踐中的方法以及現(xiàn)實(shí)中的困境。第二部分詳細(xì)闡述了刑事豁免制度的立法背景和前提是不得強(qiáng)迫自證其罪原則,并概括了行賄人刑事豁免制度的內(nèi)容。論述了行賄人刑事豁免制度的法理基礎(chǔ)利益權(quán)衡原則和哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)實(shí)用主義哲學(xué)。介紹了目前我國建立行賄人刑事豁免制度的支持以及反對(duì)的觀點(diǎn),并從我國政治倫理、刑事訴訟目的、罪責(zé)刑相適應(yīng)的角度論證了我國賄賂犯罪訴訟中建立行賄人刑事豁免制度的可行性。第三部分介紹了英國、美國、德國的相關(guān)制度,及其在賄賂犯罪訴訟過程中的應(yīng)用,并對(duì)其豁免模式、適用范圍進(jìn)行了比較。第四部分結(jié)合我國賄賂犯罪訴訟的實(shí)際情況,論述了我國建立行賄人刑事豁免制度的現(xiàn)實(shí)必要性,通過借鑒域外經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出在我國賄賂案件訴訟中建立行賄人刑事豁免制度的構(gòu)想,為完善我國打擊嚴(yán)重的賄賂犯罪的立法與司法實(shí)踐提供參考。
[Abstract]:The criminal immunity system of bribe-payer is essentially the criminal immunity system of tainted witness. According to the interpretation of the Japanese jurist Shou Taguchi, the system of criminal immunity of tainted witnesses refers to "when the right of refusal of statement is exercised on the basis of the prerogative of self-attribution and the necessary evidence cannot be obtained to substantiate the crime," The system of exempting some of the accomplices from criminal responsibility, depriving him of the privilege of refusing to impute himself, forcing him to state, and proving the guilt of others with his statements ". The content of tainted witness system is relatively broad, which is applicable to all kinds of criminal cases. This paper only discusses the construction of criminal immunity system of bribe-payers in bribery criminal litigation. The criminal immunity system of bribe-payer is adopted by many countries in the world because of its own judicial value. The purpose of the system is to ensure the prosecution of bribery crimes with limited judicial resources. The particularity of bribery case makes it more valuable to establish the criminal immunity system of bribe payer than this system in other cases. This paper is divided into four parts, the first part introduces the current situation of bribery litigation in China, the problems faced, the handling of bribe-payers, the cause of the dilemma in reality, that is, the particularity of evidence of bribery crime. It also introduces the rules of dealing with the bribe-takers in the bribery criminal litigation, the methods in the judicial practice and the difficulties in the reality. The second part expounds the legislative background and premise of the criminal immunity system in detail, and summarizes the content of the criminal immunity system of the bribe-payer, as well as the principle that the criminal immunity system should not be forced to self-incriminate itself. This paper discusses the legal basis of the criminal immunity system of bribe-payers, the principle of balancing interests and the philosophical basis of pragmatism. This paper introduces the support for and opposition to the establishment of criminal immunity system for bribe-payers in China at present, and from the point of view of political ethics and the purpose of criminal procedure in China, It proves the feasibility of establishing the criminal immunity system of bribe-payer in the bribery criminal litigation of our country from the angle of the adaptation of the criminal responsibility and punishment. The third part introduces the relevant systems of Britain, America and Germany, and their application in the process of bribery lawsuit, and compares their immunity mode and scope of application. The fourth part discusses the realistic necessity of establishing the criminal immunity system of bribe-payers in our country according to the actual situation of the bribery crime litigation in our country, and draws lessons from the experience of foreign countries. This paper puts forward the idea of establishing the criminal immunity system of bribe-payers in the litigation of bribery cases in our country, which provides a reference for perfecting the legislation and judicial practice of cracking down on serious bribery crimes in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃豁;;史上最倒霉貪官被行賄人敲詐[J];建筑市場(chǎng)與招標(biāo)投標(biāo);2008年05期

2 李爾陽;;中央新一輪反腐風(fēng)暴劍指行賄人[J];創(chuàng)造;2010年04期

3 江鵲;馮帝焱;;突破行賄人拒證的“利器”——偵查中角色的轉(zhuǎn)換[J];中國檢察官;2010年12期

4 楊杰;謝連q，

本文編號(hào)：2441686