行政公益訴訟原告資格探析
發(fā)布時間：2019-03-09 15:16
【摘要】：我國的行政法律制度無論在實(shí)踐上，還是和其他部門法相比較，都存在著許多空白和亟需發(fā)展的地方，而行政公益訴訟便是其中有待完善的一個重要部分。行政公益訴訟的缺失并不僅僅影響著我國訴訟制度的完整性，更是體現(xiàn)了我國法律發(fā)展對現(xiàn)實(shí)需要回應(yīng)的滯后性。審視現(xiàn)下法律制度所存在的漏洞，當(dāng)務(wù)之急是求得解決、彌補(bǔ)問題之方法，而確認(rèn)行政公益訴訟原告資格是建立行政公益訴訟的一項(xiàng)關(guān)鍵舉措。 現(xiàn)如今，公共利益作為界定政府行為必要性的主要界限，已逐漸成為各國衡量現(xiàn)代法治進(jìn)程的重要標(biāo)尺，對公共利益基本要素的把握是探索行政公益訴訟道路的前提條件。權(quán)利和司法救濟(jì)如影隨行，當(dāng)行政行為侵害到公共利益時，司法救濟(jì)機(jī)制的缺失必然會導(dǎo)致大量公共利益無法得到有效的保護(hù)，此時，唯有訴諸行政公益訴訟才能將那些侵犯公共利益的行政行為進(jìn)行合理的規(guī)制。然而，無原告即無訴訟，合法的訴訟在于原告擁有立法上的主體地位，確認(rèn)原告的主體地位是開啟我國行政公益訴訟制度大門的鑰匙。 信托理論、人民主權(quán)理論、訴之利益理論是建立行政公益訴訟，擴(kuò)寬行政公益訴訟原告資格范圍的理論基礎(chǔ)。司法實(shí)踐中，一樁樁典型的案例向我們證明了，行政公益訴訟原告資格制度的構(gòu)建不僅有助于加強(qiáng)對公民訴權(quán)的保護(hù)，還能填補(bǔ)我國訴訟制度上的立法空白，同時，也可以讓各種利益沖突在和諧社會下得以平衡，實(shí)現(xiàn)公平正義的價值目標(biāo)。他山之石，可以攻玉。通過考察域外代表性國家行政公益訴訟原告資格的相關(guān)理論，去其糟粕，取其精華，在結(jié)合國內(nèi)社會環(huán)境與特質(zhì)的基礎(chǔ)上，對檢察機(jī)關(guān)、社會團(tuán)體以及公民個人能否擔(dān)負(fù)起訴責(zé)任問題進(jìn)行分析與探討，，以期構(gòu)建我國的行政公益訴訟原告資格制度。
[Abstract]:There are many gaps and urgently needed development in the administrative legal system of our country, both in practice and in comparison with other department laws, and the administrative public interest litigation is one of the important parts to be perfected. The lack of administrative public interest litigation not only affects the integrity of our litigation system, but also reflects the lag of the legal development of our country in responding to the reality. To examine the loopholes existing in the present legal system, the urgent task is to find a way to solve the problems and make up the problems, and the confirmation of plaintiff's qualification in administrative public interest litigation is a key measure to establish the administrative public interest litigation. Nowadays, as the main limit to define the necessity of government behavior, public interest has gradually become an important criterion to measure the process of modern rule of law, and the grasp of the basic elements of public interest is the prerequisite for exploring the way of administrative public interest litigation. Rights and judicial remedies go hand in hand, when administrative acts infringe on the public interest, the lack of judicial relief mechanism will inevitably lead to a large number of public interests cannot be effectively protected, at this time, Only by resorting to administrative public interest litigation can those administrative acts that infringe the public interest be reasonably regulated. However, without plaintiff, there is no lawsuit. The legal action lies in plaintiff having the main body status in legislation. Confirming plaintiff's main position is the key to open the door of administrative public interest litigation system in our country. The theory of trust, the theory of people's sovereignty and the theory of interest in litigation are the theoretical basis for establishing administrative public interest litigation and broadening the scope of plaintiff's qualification in administrative public interest litigation. In judicial practice, a typical case proves to us that the construction of plaintiff qualification system in administrative public interest litigation not only helps to strengthen the protection of citizens' right of action, but also fills the legislative gap in the litigation system of our country, at the same time, It can also make all kinds of conflicts of interest balance in harmonious society and realize the value goal of fairness and justice. The stone of other mountains can be used to attack jade. By examining the relevant theories of plaintiff's qualification of administrative public interest litigation in representative countries outside China, we can get rid of its dross and take its essence, on the basis of combining the domestic social environment and characteristics, to the procuratorial organs. This paper analyzes and discusses whether social organizations and individual citizens can bear the responsibility of prosecution in order to construct plaintiff qualification system of administrative public interest litigation in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.3
本文編號：2437588
[Abstract]:There are many gaps and urgently needed development in the administrative legal system of our country, both in practice and in comparison with other department laws, and the administrative public interest litigation is one of the important parts to be perfected. The lack of administrative public interest litigation not only affects the integrity of our litigation system, but also reflects the lag of the legal development of our country in responding to the reality. To examine the loopholes existing in the present legal system, the urgent task is to find a way to solve the problems and make up the problems, and the confirmation of plaintiff's qualification in administrative public interest litigation is a key measure to establish the administrative public interest litigation. Nowadays, as the main limit to define the necessity of government behavior, public interest has gradually become an important criterion to measure the process of modern rule of law, and the grasp of the basic elements of public interest is the prerequisite for exploring the way of administrative public interest litigation. Rights and judicial remedies go hand in hand, when administrative acts infringe on the public interest, the lack of judicial relief mechanism will inevitably lead to a large number of public interests cannot be effectively protected, at this time, Only by resorting to administrative public interest litigation can those administrative acts that infringe the public interest be reasonably regulated. However, without plaintiff, there is no lawsuit. The legal action lies in plaintiff having the main body status in legislation. Confirming plaintiff's main position is the key to open the door of administrative public interest litigation system in our country. The theory of trust, the theory of people's sovereignty and the theory of interest in litigation are the theoretical basis for establishing administrative public interest litigation and broadening the scope of plaintiff's qualification in administrative public interest litigation. In judicial practice, a typical case proves to us that the construction of plaintiff qualification system in administrative public interest litigation not only helps to strengthen the protection of citizens' right of action, but also fills the legislative gap in the litigation system of our country, at the same time, It can also make all kinds of conflicts of interest balance in harmonious society and realize the value goal of fairness and justice. The stone of other mountains can be used to attack jade. By examining the relevant theories of plaintiff's qualification of administrative public interest litigation in representative countries outside China, we can get rid of its dross and take its essence, on the basis of combining the domestic social environment and characteristics, to the procuratorial organs. This paper analyzes and discusses whether social organizations and individual citizens can bear the responsibility of prosecution in order to construct plaintiff qualification system of administrative public interest litigation in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條
1 高家偉;論行政訴訟原告資格[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1997年01期
2 沈�？�;論對我國行政訴訟原告資格制度的認(rèn)識及其發(fā)展[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年05期
3 湛中樂,孫占京;論檢察機(jī)關(guān)對行政訴訟的法律監(jiān)督[J];法學(xué)研究;1994年01期
4 關(guān)福艷;民主法治:和諧社會的首要特征[J];人民論壇;2005年10期
5 馬懷德;;公益行政訴訟的原告資格及提起條件論析——以兩起案件為視角[J];中州學(xué)刊;2006年03期
本文編號：2437588
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2437588.html
最近更新
教材專著
