【摘要】：新修改的《中華人民共和國(guó)刑事訴訟法》(以下簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)新《刑訴法》)已于2013年1月1日起施行,新《刑訴法》中,對(duì)檢察機(jī)關(guān)查辦職務(wù)犯罪案件的刑事偵查行為作出了新的規(guī)定,其中第七十三條規(guī)定了檢察機(jī)關(guān)在查辦特別重大賄賂犯罪案件中可以適用指定居所監(jiān)視居住強(qiáng)制措施。這一規(guī)定既是一個(gè)機(jī)遇也是一個(gè)挑戰(zhàn)。從新《刑訴法》施行至今,各地檢察機(jī)關(guān)在查辦職務(wù)犯罪案件過(guò)程中,對(duì)特別重大賄賂犯罪嫌疑人適用指定居所監(jiān)視居住強(qiáng)制措施,在不同程度上取得了犯罪嫌疑人的有罪供述,目前部分犯罪嫌疑人已經(jīng)被提起公訴并獲有罪判決。指定居所監(jiān)視居住強(qiáng)制措施的適用,對(duì)檢察機(jī)關(guān)查辦特別重大賄賂犯罪起到了顯而易見(jiàn)的積極作用。但是,該強(qiáng)制措施在適用中也存在一些問(wèn)題,其所表現(xiàn)出的以滿足偵查需要為核心的特點(diǎn),以及在執(zhí)行過(guò)程中所表現(xiàn)出的內(nèi)在羈押性,均與監(jiān)視居住強(qiáng)制措施的設(shè)立目的性存在重大的矛盾。因此,需要結(jié)合實(shí)踐對(duì)指定居所監(jiān)視居住強(qiáng)制措施的適用進(jìn)行深入的調(diào)查研究,使其進(jìn)一步改進(jìn),讓該項(xiàng)強(qiáng)制措施發(fā)揮其所應(yīng)起到的作用。本文將結(jié)合新《刑訴法》自2013年1月1日施行以來(lái),某市市級(jí)檢察院運(yùn)用指定居所監(jiān)視居住查辦特別重大賄賂犯罪案件的情況,展現(xiàn)指定居所監(jiān)視居住強(qiáng)制措施所起到的積極作用,研究指定居所監(jiān)視居住強(qiáng)制措施的所存在的問(wèn)題,并提出解決問(wèn)題的方法。
[Abstract]:The newly amended Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the new Criminal procedure Law) has been in force since January 1, 2013. A new regulation has been made on the criminal investigation behavior of the procuratorial organs in investigating and handling job-related crimes. Article 73 stipulates that the procuratorial organs may apply the compulsory measures of residence monitoring in the investigation and handling of especially serious bribery cases. This provision is both an opportunity and a challenge. Since the implementation of the new Criminal procedure Law, in the course of investigating and handling job-related crimes, procuratorial organs in various localities have applied mandatory measures of residence monitoring and residence monitoring to the suspects of especially important bribery crimes. At present, some suspects have been prosecuted and convicted. The application of mandatory residence monitoring measures plays an obvious and positive role in the prosecution's investigation of especially serious bribery crimes. However, there are some problems in the application of this coercive measure, which shows the characteristics of meeting the needs of investigation and the inherent detention in the process of implementation. There is a major contradiction with the purpose of establishing compulsory measures of monitoring residence. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a thorough investigation and study on the application of the mandatory measure of residence monitoring in combination with practice, so that it can be further improved so that the compulsory measure can play its role. Since the implementation of the new Criminal procedure Law on January 1, 2013, a municipal procuratorate will use its designated residence to monitor the investigation of particularly serious bribery cases. This paper demonstrates the positive effect of mandatory residence monitoring measures, studies the problems existing in the mandatory residence monitoring measures, and puts forward some solutions to the problems.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 林偉忠;宋凱;;論職務(wù)犯罪偵查中強(qiáng)制措施層次性體系[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年28期

2 王貞會(huì);;羈押替代性措施的涵義、模式與功能省思[J];比較法研究;2013年02期

3 周長(zhǎng)軍;;從基本權(quán)干預(yù)原理論指定居所監(jiān)視居住——兼評(píng)新《刑事訴訟法》第73條[J];山東社會(huì)科學(xué);2013年04期

4 尹吉;;“指定居所監(jiān)視居住”的法律適用研究[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2012年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2410804