【摘要】：行政機(jī)關(guān)負(fù)責(zé)人出庭應(yīng)訴制度于2015年5月1日隨著新《行政訴訟法》的生效正式在全國(guó)范圍內(nèi)生效并且實(shí)施。該制度是由陜西合陽(yáng)縣最先提出并實(shí)施,隨后全國(guó)各地區(qū)也相繼跟著實(shí)施。該制度有利于化解當(dāng)前的行政審判難等問(wèn)題。因此,本文就主要對(duì)行政機(jī)關(guān)負(fù)責(zé)人出庭應(yīng)訴制度進(jìn)行分析,著重分析該制度在司法實(shí)務(wù)上存在的問(wèn)題,繼而找出產(chǎn)生這些問(wèn)題的原因,并提出自己的改進(jìn)思路。另外,通過(guò)對(duì)行政機(jī)關(guān)負(fù)責(zé)人出庭應(yīng)訴制度司法實(shí)踐現(xiàn)狀的分析,嘗試構(gòu)建與其相適應(yīng)的保障機(jī)制,進(jìn)而更好地推進(jìn)此制度的實(shí)施,在我國(guó)法制建設(shè)的進(jìn)程中發(fā)揮出其應(yīng)有的作用。本文主要由四部分構(gòu)成,以下就對(duì)每一部分作一個(gè)簡(jiǎn)單的介紹:本文第一部分以行政機(jī)關(guān)負(fù)責(zé)人出庭應(yīng)訴制度的相關(guān)概念為基礎(chǔ),通過(guò)對(duì)相關(guān)概念的了解與把握進(jìn)而分析行政機(jī)關(guān)負(fù)責(zé)人出庭應(yīng)訴制度所蘊(yùn)含的價(jià)值底蘊(yùn)。對(duì)本文后敘起到開(kāi)題與引領(lǐng)作用。本文第二部分簡(jiǎn)單闡述了行政機(jī)關(guān)負(fù)責(zé)人出庭應(yīng)訴制度的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展以及在立法中行政機(jī)關(guān)負(fù)責(zé)人出庭應(yīng)訴制度的具體規(guī)定以及在司法實(shí)務(wù)中的實(shí)施現(xiàn)狀。由這一部分我們可知:行政機(jī)關(guān)負(fù)責(zé)人出庭應(yīng)訴制度是自下而上、緩慢推進(jìn)而產(chǎn)生的制度,即先由各個(gè)地方探索、摸索,到達(dá)一定程度后,國(guó)務(wù)院及最高法再頒布統(tǒng)一文件、各個(gè)地方施行的制度;通過(guò)介紹這一制度在司法實(shí)務(wù)中的實(shí)施現(xiàn)狀,我們可知這一制度在司法實(shí)踐中實(shí)施的并不好,還有待我們?nèi)ネ晟坪图訌?qiáng)。本文第三部分是以第二部分為基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)一步探究行政機(jī)關(guān)負(fù)責(zé)人出庭應(yīng)訴制度在司法實(shí)務(wù)過(guò)程中存在的問(wèn)題,并從不同層面來(lái)思考產(chǎn)生這些問(wèn)題的原因。本文第四部分是以第二部分和第三部分的闡述為前提,分別從內(nèi)部制度、法院系統(tǒng)內(nèi)制度及新聞媒體層面對(duì)行政機(jī)關(guān)負(fù)責(zé)人出庭應(yīng)訴制度提出自己的一點(diǎn)構(gòu)想,為此制度的完善盡到自己的一點(diǎn)綿薄之力。
[Abstract]:As the new Administrative procedure Law came into effect on May 1, 2015, the system of administrative organ chief appearing in court came into effect in the whole country. The system was first put forward and implemented in Heyang County, Shaanxi Province. The system is conducive to resolving the current problems such as difficult administrative trial. Therefore, this paper mainly analyzes the system of the chief of administrative organs appearing in court, analyzes the problems existing in the judicial practice, and then finds out the causes of these problems and puts forward some suggestions for improvement. In addition, through the analysis of the current situation of the judicial practice of the system of chief executives appearing in court, the author tries to construct a suitable safeguard mechanism to promote the implementation of the system better. Play its due role in the process of legal system construction in our country. This paper is mainly composed of four parts. The following is a brief introduction to each part: the first part of this paper is based on the related concepts of the system of responsible persons of administrative organs appearing in court. Through understanding and grasping the related concepts, this paper analyzes the value of the system of chief executives appearing in court. This article plays a leading role in the post-narration. The second part of this paper briefly expounds the emergence and development of the system of the chief of administrative organs appearing in court, the specific provisions of the system of the chief of administrative organs appearing in court in the legislation and the present situation of its implementation in the judicial practice. From this part, we can see that the system of chief executives of administrative organs appearing in court is a system that emerges from the bottom-up and slowly advancing, that is, it is first explored and groped by various localities, and then, to a certain extent, the State Council and the Supreme Law promulgate a unified document. Systems in operation in various localities; By introducing the present situation of the implementation of this system in judicial practice, we know that the implementation of this system in judicial practice is not good, but we still need to improve and strengthen it. The third part of this paper is based on the second part to further explore the administrative organs in the system of appearance in court in the process of judicial practice problems, and from different levels to think about the causes of these problems. The fourth part of this article is based on the second part and the third part of the elaboration as the premise, respectively from the internal system, the court system and the news media level to the administrative organ responsible person appears in the lawsuit system to put forward own point of view. To improve the system to their own little bit of power.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：甘肅政法學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張雙山;楊美安;唐真興;;出庭應(yīng)訴 城口縣長(zhǎng)敢于“吃螃蟹”[J];公民導(dǎo)刊;2008年10期

2 張育仁;;讓官員出庭應(yīng)訴成為法治社會(huì)常態(tài)[J];公民導(dǎo)刊;2014年06期

3 陽(yáng)明武;行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴的意義[J];政府法制;2003年21期

4 一孔;;云南首例一把手出庭應(yīng)訴案原告敗訴[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(上半月);2008年05期

5 許圣榮;倪恩良;季宏;;行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴的實(shí)踐與探索[J];中國(guó)工商管理研究;2008年12期

6 王應(yīng)強(qiáng);;論建立行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴制度[J];學(xué)習(xí)論壇;2008年04期

7 賀冠斐;;構(gòu)建行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴制度管見(jiàn)[J];南陽(yáng)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期

8 ;江蘇 國(guó)土資源廳領(lǐng)導(dǎo)首次出庭應(yīng)訴[J];資源與人居環(huán)境;2008年12期

9 盧國(guó)偉;趙會(huì)平;;河南南陽(yáng)推行行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴制度[J];中國(guó)審判;2008年07期

10 姜忠惠;姜福信;王喜英;;水行政機(jī)關(guān)出庭應(yīng)訴要點(diǎn)[J];黑龍江水利科技;2009年03期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 黎軍;楊惠宇;;制度設(shè)計(jì)與制度實(shí)踐——行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴的實(shí)證研究[A];全國(guó)法院第25屆學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)獲獎(jiǎng)?wù)撐募汗痉ㄅc行政法實(shí)施問(wèn)題研究（下冊(cè)）[C];2013年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 柏佳春　龔永泉;南通推行行政負(fù)責(zé)人出庭應(yīng)訴制度[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

2 《中國(guó)司法》副總編輯 劉武俊;“一把手”出庭應(yīng)訴亟需制度化[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

3 記者 衛(wèi)建萍　通訊員 董燕靜;積極倡導(dǎo)行政領(lǐng)導(dǎo)出庭應(yīng)訴[N];人民法院報(bào);2009年

4 記者 付洪軍　見(jiàn)習(xí)記者 胡細(xì)鶯;“民告官”一把手須出庭應(yīng)訴[N];珠海特區(qū)報(bào);2009年

5 記者 何清平;“逼”行政一把手出庭應(yīng)訴[N];重慶日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

6 魏文彪;局長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴 扯不上“人人平等”[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2004年

7 劉武俊;一把手出庭應(yīng)訴倒逼依法行政[N];福建日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

8 本報(bào)記者 裴智勇;江蘇海安7年206位行政領(lǐng)導(dǎo)出庭應(yīng)訴[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

9 記者 張寬明 通訊員 顧成勇;江蘇海安縣長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴“民告官”案[N];人民法院報(bào);2012年

10 海門市悅來(lái)鎮(zhèn)政府 洪玲艷;縣長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴的標(biāo)本意義[N];南通日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 張怡晴;行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴制度的理性認(rèn)識(shí)[D];中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院;2014年

2 孟靜;延邊地區(qū)行政機(jī)關(guān)負(fù)責(zé)人出庭應(yīng)訴形式化現(xiàn)象探究[D];延邊大學(xué);2016年

3 宋旭;論行政訴訟被告負(fù)責(zé)人出庭應(yīng)訴制度[D];湘潭大學(xué);2016年

4 王雪;S縣行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴情況調(diào)研報(bào)告[D];遼寧大學(xué);2016年

5 謝麗華;行政機(jī)關(guān)負(fù)責(zé)人出庭應(yīng)訴制度研究[D];廣西民族大學(xué);2016年

6 陳玉香;我國(guó)行政機(jī)關(guān)負(fù)責(zé)人出庭應(yīng)訴制度研究[D];新疆大學(xué);2017年

7 徐夢(mèng)，

本文編號(hào)：2404903