【摘要】：死刑是懲罰犯罪最嚴厲的方式之一,死刑的適用關乎人的生命,一旦執(zhí)行錯誤,就會發(fā)生錯殺、濫殺。因此,對于死刑制度,我國采取了十分謹慎的態(tài)度。由于死刑案件本身具有特殊性,因而我國對于死刑案件的審判程序的規(guī)定要比普通的刑事案件審判程序更加嚴格。從目前來看,我國對于死刑案件審判程序做出了很多特殊性的規(guī)定,例如規(guī)定了死刑案件的審理期限問題,死刑復核程序等等。但是,還是存在很多有待完善的地方。例如,存在一些死刑案件證明標準過于籠統(tǒng),辯護人的辯護作用難以充分發(fā)揮,死刑復核程序缺乏期限限制等缺陷與問題。同時,日本和美國是發(fā)達國家中適用死刑制度的典型代表,他們在死刑適用上的特別規(guī)定不同于我國的死刑審判程序。這些國家死刑案件的程序和制度規(guī)定對我國死刑審判程序的完善與改革具有重要的借鑒意義。我國可以在參考與借鑒美國與日本的死刑審判制度的同時,再具體地針對我國現(xiàn)行的有關死刑審判程序出現(xiàn)的問題進行完善。本文一共分為五大部分,第一部分是對完善我國死刑審判程序的必要性予以了詳述,第二部分主要闡述了我國死刑案件審判程序的特別性要求,第三部分重點剖析了我國現(xiàn)行死刑案件審判制度在各個方面出現(xiàn)的各種缺陷和矛盾,第四部分簡單介紹了國外相類似的制度,第五部分與第三部分相呼應,主要是為第三部分當中提出的各種問題尋找切實可行的解決方法,為我國死刑案件審判程序的完善尋找思路,并從各個方面為我國公安司法機關相關工作的改進提出了對策和建議。
[Abstract]:Death penalty is one of the most severe ways to punish crime. The application of death penalty is related to human life. Therefore, the death penalty system, China has taken a very cautious attitude. Because of the particularity of death penalty cases, the rules of trial procedure of death penalty cases in our country are more strict than those of ordinary criminal cases. From the current point of view, our country has made a lot of special provisions for the trial procedure of death penalty cases, such as the time limit of the death penalty cases, the death penalty review procedures and so on. However, there are still many areas to be improved. For example, there are some defects and problems such as the standard of proof of death penalty cases is too general, the defense function of the defender is difficult to give full play, the death penalty review procedure lacks the limitation of time limit and so on. At the same time, Japan and the United States are typical representatives of the application of the death penalty in developed countries, their special provisions in the application of the death penalty are different from the death penalty procedure in our country. The procedure and system provisions of death penalty cases in these countries are of great significance to the perfection and reform of the death penalty trial procedure in our country. Our country can refer to and draw lessons from the death penalty trial system of the United States and Japan, and at the same time, concretely aim at the problems of the death penalty trial procedure in our country. This paper is divided into five parts altogether. The first part is about the necessity of perfecting the death penalty trial procedure in our country. The second part mainly expounds the special requirements of the death penalty trial procedure in our country. The third part focuses on the analysis of the current death penalty trial system in China in various aspects of the defects and contradictions, the fourth part of a brief introduction of similar systems abroad, the fifth part and the third part echo. The main purpose is to find practical solutions to the various problems raised in the third part, and to find a way of thinking for the perfection of the trial procedures of death penalty cases in our country. The countermeasures and suggestions are put forward for the improvement of the relevant work of the public security and judicial organs in China from various aspects.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 劉仁文;郭莉;;論死刑復核法律監(jiān)督的完善[J];中國刑事法雜志;2012年06期

2 劉仁文;;中國死刑改革的回顧與展望[J];河南財經(jīng)政法大學學報;2012年02期

3 蔣薇;;死刑復核程序完善路徑之探究——以死刑復核權歸位為視角[J];法制與社會;2009年01期

4 王敏遠;;死刑案件的證明“標準”及《刑事訴訟法》的修改[J];法學;2008年07期

5 卞建林;;以死刑案件為切入點 建立程序制裁機制[J];人民檢察;2007年23期

6 冀祥德;;死刑復核程序的現(xiàn)代定位 以死刑的程序控制為視角[J];法律適用;2007年05期

7 樊崇義;葉肖華;;死刑的實體和程序控制[J];中國司法;2006年08期

8 萬毅;;我國死刑審判制度之檢討與重造[J];西南大學學報(人文社會科學版);2006年03期

9 陳暉;最高人民法院收回死刑核準權的法理學分析[J];北京政法職業(yè)學院學報;2005年02期

10 張永江,舒洪水;中國死刑復核程序的檢討與改進[J];河北法學;2005年01期

，

本文編號：2395717