【摘要】：在我國(guó)刑事訴訟中,國(guó)家公權(quán)力和被追訴人權(quán)利形成的對(duì)抗最為明顯和激烈的階段就是偵查階段。基于懲罰犯罪,保障社會(huì)治安穩(wěn)定的迫切需要,出于我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)文化與現(xiàn)有國(guó)情的綜合考慮,我國(guó)的偵查程序呈現(xiàn)出強(qiáng)職權(quán)主義的訴訟形態(tài)。為了完成懲罰犯罪,保障社會(huì)治安穩(wěn)定的目標(biāo),國(guó)家賦予了偵查機(jī)關(guān)強(qiáng)大的權(quán)利,相比之下,被追訴人的權(quán)利卻顯得非常弱小。這種強(qiáng)大權(quán)利被賦予的同時(shí),卻沒(méi)有與之相配備的監(jiān)督和制約體系,這就會(huì)導(dǎo)致偵查行為出現(xiàn)諸如范圍擴(kuò)大,超出必要限度等這樣那樣的問(wèn)題,也直接威脅到了公民的權(quán)利,更不必說(shuō)我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段仍然存在的刑訊逼供、非法搜查、非法扣押等實(shí)施違法偵查行為,嚴(yán)重?fù)p害了相對(duì)人權(quán)利,也嚴(yán)重?fù)p害了我國(guó)司法權(quán)威。隨著近些年人權(quán)觀念和程序正義的觀念進(jìn)入到人們視線的中心,人們?cè)絹?lái)越關(guān)注偵查程序中被追訴人的權(quán)利保護(hù),而如何使我國(guó)偵查行為能夠規(guī)范化運(yùn)行也就成為了關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)。本文主要分為四個(gè)部分,第一部分是對(duì)于概念的厘定,對(duì)文章所涉及的主要概念偵查行為進(jìn)行了辨析和分類(lèi),確定了論文主要寫(xiě)作概念的范圍。第二部分是偵查行為的實(shí)施原則,通過(guò)實(shí)施原則的分析和說(shuō)明,確定了偵查行為規(guī)范化改善的理論基礎(chǔ)和基本原則。第三部分是對(duì)于我國(guó)偵查行為現(xiàn)狀的分析和反思,并聯(lián)系2013年新刑事訴訟法的修改,看到我國(guó)對(duì)于偵查行為規(guī)范化所做出的努力,也找出現(xiàn)在仍然存在的不足。第四部分則是對(duì)于偵查行為規(guī)范化的完善,通過(guò)制度的提出和完善,來(lái)使我國(guó)的偵查行為能夠更規(guī)范化的運(yùn)行。本文通過(guò)比較分析,文獻(xiàn)分析等方法對(duì)我國(guó)偵查行為現(xiàn)狀的分析和反思,聯(lián)系國(guó)外的偵查行為的監(jiān)督制約機(jī)制,試圖對(duì)我國(guó)偵查行為的運(yùn)行進(jìn)行規(guī)范化完善。
[Abstract]:In criminal proceedings in our country, the most obvious and intense stage of the confrontation between the public power of the state and the right of the accused is the stage of investigation. Based on the urgent need of punishing crime and ensuring the stability of public order, the investigation procedure of our country presents the litigation form of strong authority because of the comprehensive consideration of the traditional culture and the existing national conditions of our country. In order to achieve the goal of punishing crime and ensuring the stability of public order, the state has given the investigative organ a powerful right, but the right of the prosecuted person appears to be very weak. This powerful right is given without a monitoring and control system, which can lead to problems such as expanding the scope of investigation, exceeding the necessary limits, and directly threatening the rights of citizens. Not to mention, the illegal investigation such as extorting confessions by torture, illegal search and seizure still exists in our country at the present stage, which seriously damages the rights of relative parties and the judicial authority of our country. As the concept of human rights and procedural justice has entered the center of attention in recent years, people are paying more and more attention to the protection of the rights of those prosecuted in the investigation procedure. And how to make our country's investigation behavior can be standardized operation has become the focus of attention. This paper is mainly divided into four parts. The first part is the definition of the concept, the article involved in the main concept of criminal investigation behavior discrimination and classification, to determine the scope of the main writing concepts. The second part is the implementation principle of investigation behavior. Through the analysis and explanation of the implementation principle, the theoretical basis and basic principles of the standardization improvement of investigation behavior are determined. The third part is the analysis and reflection on the current situation of investigation in our country and the revision of the new criminal procedure law in 2013. We can see the efforts of our country to standardize the investigation behavior and find out the shortcomings that still exist. The fourth part is to perfect the standardization of investigation behavior, through the system put forward and perfect, to make the investigation behavior of our country more standardized operation. Through comparative analysis, literature analysis and other methods to analyze and reflect on the present situation of investigation behavior in China, this paper tries to standardize and perfect the operation of investigation behavior in China by connecting with the supervision and restriction mechanism of foreign investigation behavior.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 劉捷;;偵查監(jiān)督體系論——偵查監(jiān)督體系的構(gòu)建[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年11期

2 張鋼;;軍地刑事司法視角下“偵查”和“偵察”界分[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年08期

3 王福相;王茜;張旭明;;偵查基本原則學(xué)理解讀[J];凈月學(xué)刊;2013年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2393975