【摘要】：刑事再審申訴作為再審程序啟動重要條件之一,其相關(guān)制度的完善與否關(guān)乎著再審程序啟動的合理性、正確性,防止再審程序隨意啟動或嚴(yán)格閉合。我國當(dāng)前的刑事再審申訴處于一個很不完備的階段,現(xiàn)有的刑事再審申訴相關(guān)的法律規(guī)定也不夠健全、不夠細(xì)化,還沒有形成完備的刑事再審申訴程序。一方面伴隨著大量刑事再審申訴案件涌入法院、檢察院,辦案人員長期承擔(dān)著大量刑事案件的審查、復(fù)查的辦案壓力,也肩負(fù)著涉訴信訪等工作;另一方面當(dāng)事人及其法定代理人、近親屬對生效裁判的申訴僅作為法檢兩院提起審判監(jiān)督程序的材料來源之一,對于確實(shí)存在的冤假錯案的當(dāng)事人,在試圖通過刑事申訴維護(hù)自身權(quán)利的過程中存在許多不便和障礙,難以確保申訴權(quán)的實(shí)現(xiàn)。此外,也有一些當(dāng)事人因不滿意申訴結(jié)果而濫用訴權(quán),纏訟、鬧訪等“信訪不信法”的現(xiàn)象時有發(fā)生,已經(jīng)嚴(yán)重影響社會秩序和公共安全。幾年來一起起冤假錯案浮出水面,不僅引起來社會的廣泛關(guān)注,同時刑事再審申訴復(fù)查的實(shí)質(zhì)性也遭受公眾的質(zhì)疑。因此,為切實(shí)保障當(dāng)事人的基本人權(quán),實(shí)現(xiàn)公平正義,解決目前刑事再審申訴困難、申訴程序混亂不清,申訴審查行政化等局面,有必要完善對刑事再審申訴的相關(guān)規(guī)定。本文以我國刑事再審申訴的價值及重要意義為切入點(diǎn),通過對刑事再審申訴的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行分析,總結(jié)出目前存在的如刑事再審申訴條件不明確,造成申訴門檻過低;刑事申訴復(fù)查機(jī)制不健全,難以保障再審申訴有效審查;再審申訴過程中律師參與不足;重大冤案缺乏特殊救濟(jì)渠道等幾個方面的問題,并對比借鑒、參考國外的相關(guān)實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn),結(jié)合我國國情,提出相應(yīng)的完善建議。
[Abstract]:Criminal retrial appeal is one of the important conditions for the retrial procedure to start. Whether the relevant system is perfect or not is related to the rationality and correctness of the retrial procedure and prevents the retrial procedure from starting at will or strictly closed. The current criminal retrial appeal in our country is in a very incomplete stage, the existing criminal retrial appeal related legal provisions are not perfect enough, not detailed enough, has not formed a complete criminal retrial appeal procedure. On the one hand, with a large number of criminal retrial appeal cases pouring into the court, procuratorates, case handlers have a long period of time to undertake a large number of criminal cases review of the pressure to handle cases, but also bear the burden of litigation letters and visits. On the other hand, the appeal of the parties and their legal representatives, the close relatives, against the effective decision is only one of the sources of material for the judicial supervision proceedings initiated by both chambers of the procuratorate. There are many inconveniences and obstacles in the process of trying to protect one's rights through criminal appeal, so it is difficult to ensure the realization of the right of appeal. In addition, some litigants abuse their right of action because they are not satisfied with the result of the complaint, such as "petition or not believing in the law", which has seriously affected social order and public security. Over the past few years, a case of injustice, falsehood and error has surfaced, drawing attention not only to the society, but also to the public's doubts about the substance of the review of criminal retrial complaints. Therefore, in order to protect the basic human rights of the parties, realize fairness and justice, resolve the difficulties of the present criminal retrial appeal, the appeal procedure is not clear, and the appeal review is administrative, it is necessary to perfect the relevant provisions of the criminal retrial appeal. This article regards the value and significance of criminal retrial appeal as the breakthrough point, through the analysis of the present situation of criminal retrial appeal, concludes that the existing conditions of criminal retrial appeal are not clear, resulting in the appeal threshold is too low; The review mechanism of criminal appeal is not perfect, it is difficult to guarantee the effective examination of retrial appeal, the lawyer's participation in the process of retrial appeal is insufficient; The major grievance cases lack special relief channels and so on. This paper compares and draws lessons from the relevant practical experiences of foreign countries and puts forward corresponding suggestions for perfection in combination with the national conditions of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳衛(wèi)東;趙恒;;刑事申訴聽證制度研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2016年01期

2 田繼紅;;律師代理刑事申訴制度必要性及可行性[J];法制與社會;2015年34期

3 何家弘;劉譯礬;;刑事錯案申訴再審制度實(shí)證研究[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2015年06期

4 吳錦鞍;;刑事申訴終結(jié)機(jī)制的研究[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年02期

5 王東風(fēng);楊立新;李洋;;刑事申訴制度中存在的問題及對策[J];山西省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年02期

6 霍成茹;;我國刑事申訴制度憲法基礎(chǔ)新論——以《刑事訴訟法》修改為背景[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年11期

7 張巍;;刑事申訴制度存在的問題及解決對策[J];人民檢察;2010年13期

8 周洪波;周清水;;我國刑事申訴制度的反思與完善[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年05期

9 王強(qiáng);王成;;刑事申訴案件公開聽證制度的缺陷及完善[J];中國司法;2007年10期

10 蘇仁興;;刑事申訴制度的完善[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年05期

，

本文編號：2391031