【摘要】：從本階段試點來看,由檢察機關(guān)提起行政公益訴訟,在完善行政訴訟架構(gòu)、維護國家和社會公共利益、監(jiān)督政府依法行政、強化行政檢察監(jiān)督工作、為全面推開行政公益訴訟提供參考樣本等方面發(fā)揮了重要作用。但當前的行政公益訴訟還依然存在案件范圍過于狹窄、線索發(fā)現(xiàn)及轉(zhuǎn)化機制不暢、訴訟類型選擇標準不明、訴前程序與訴訟程序?qū)硬煌晟�、檢察機關(guān)訴訟地位不明、檢察機關(guān)調(diào)查取證機制不完善、舉證責任有待進一步明確、撤訴規(guī)則有待厘清、判決的履行與執(zhí)行存在障礙等多方面問題。上述問題需要在下一步立法中得到解決。
[Abstract]:From the pilot point of view at this stage, the procuratorial organs will institute administrative public interest litigation, improve the administrative litigation structure, safeguard the national and social public interests, supervise the administration of the government according to law, and strengthen the administrative procuratorial supervision. It has played an important role in providing reference samples for the promotion of administrative public interest litigation. However, the current administrative public interest litigation still has too narrow scope of cases, the mechanism of clue discovery and transformation is not smooth, the standard of choice of litigation type is not clear, the docking of pre-litigation procedure and litigation procedure is not perfect, and the position of procuratorial organ litigation is not clear. The mechanism of investigation and collection of evidence by procuratorial organs is imperfect, the burden of proof needs to be further clarified, the rules of withdrawal of charges need to be clarified, and there are many problems in the implementation and execution of judgments. The above problems need to be solved in the next step of legislation.
【作者單位】： 中國政法大學;
【基金】：“檢察機關(guān)提起行政公益訴訟試點工作評估”項目的階段性成果。項目主持人為中國政法大學副校長、中國行政法學研究會會長馬懷德教授,執(zhí)行負責人為中國政法大學法治政府研究院副院長趙鵬副教授。課題組成員包括中國政法大學法治政府研究院副教授林華,中國政法大學法治政府研究院教師王翔,中國政法大學博士研究生孔祥穩(wěn)、中國政法大學博士研究生王玎、中國政法大學博士研究生余積明、中國政法大學碩士研究生林稼朋、孔祥穩(wěn)、王玎、余積明承擔了調(diào)研報告的主要撰寫工作
【分類號】：D925.3

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 裘t，

本文編號：2389696