【摘要】：受建國以來政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化等諸多條件的限制,我國行政訴訟管轄制度的設(shè)置與行政區(qū)劃高度重疊,導(dǎo)致了行政訴訟制度面臨司法行政化、司法地方化、法院案件負(fù)擔(dān)不合理等弊端。自上世紀(jì)末以來,最高人民法院和不少地方法院試圖以變更管轄為突破口,“提級(jí)管轄”、“異地管轄”、“相對(duì)集中管轄”等創(chuàng)新舉措不斷涌現(xiàn)。黨的十八屆三中全會(huì)提出了“探索建立與行政區(qū)劃適當(dāng)分離的司法管轄制度”的改革構(gòu)想,新修訂的行政訴訟法從立法上正式確立了跨區(qū)劃管轄集中制度。然而改革整體上的收效卻不盡如人意。具體表現(xiàn)在:改革只是在現(xiàn)行司法體制內(nèi)的微調(diào);大部分非集中管轄法院的行政審判職能處于“休眠”狀態(tài);行政審判與信訪穩(wěn)控機(jī)制出現(xiàn)錯(cuò)位;司法和行政良性互動(dòng)機(jī)制有待重構(gòu);增加了當(dāng)事人的訴訟成本。為了完善我國行政訴訟跨區(qū)劃集中管轄制度,既應(yīng)通過局部的、漸進(jìn)的步驟解決現(xiàn)實(shí)問題,同時(shí)也需要制定徹底的、長(zhǎng)期的規(guī)劃。一方面,在現(xiàn)行司法體制下需要著重在以下幾個(gè)方面給予完善:建立人員、經(jīng)費(fèi)保障機(jī)制;健全法院內(nèi)部協(xié)調(diào)配合機(jī)制,完善考評(píng)激勵(lì)機(jī)制;完善信訪維穩(wěn)機(jī)制;完善便民訴訟制度,降低訴訟成本;增強(qiáng)司法權(quán)與行政權(quán)的良性互動(dòng);另一方面,可以借助當(dāng)前跨區(qū)劃集中管轄改革的實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn),同時(shí)參考與吸收域外行政訴訟管轄模式,探索完成行政訴訟跨區(qū)化集中管轄改革的最終設(shè)想——建立行政法院。
[Abstract]:Limited by the political, economic and cultural conditions since the founding of the people's Republic of China, the establishment of the administrative litigation jurisdiction system in China is highly overlapped with the administrative division, resulting in the administrative litigation system facing judicial administration and localization. The court case burden is unreasonable and so on malpractice. Since the end of the last century, the Supreme people's Court and many local courts have tried to change jurisdiction as a breakthrough point, such as "upgrade jurisdiction", "different jurisdiction", "relatively centralized jurisdiction" and other innovative measures. The third Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee put forward the reform idea of "exploring the establishment of a judicial jurisdiction system that is properly separated from administrative divisions", and the newly revised Administrative procedure Law formally established the centralization system of cross-regionalization jurisdiction in legislation. However, the overall results of the reform were not satisfactory. The concrete manifestations are as follows: the reform is only a fine adjustment in the current judicial system; most of the administrative trial functions of the non-centralized jurisdiction courts are in a "dormant" state; the mechanism of administrative trial and stable control of letters and visits is misplaced; The benign interaction mechanism between judicature and administration needs to be reconstructed, which increases the litigant's litigation cost. In order to perfect the centralized jurisdiction system of administrative litigation in China, we should solve the practical problems through partial and gradual steps, at the same time, we need to formulate a thorough and long-term plan. On the one hand, in the current judicial system, we should focus on the following aspects: to establish personnel and funding security mechanism; to improve the internal coordination mechanism of the court, to improve the evaluation incentive mechanism; to improve the mechanism of maintaining stability of letters and visits; Improve the system of convenient litigation, reduce the cost of litigation, strengthen the positive interaction between judicial power and administrative power; On the other hand, with the help of the practical experience of the reform of cross-regionalization and centralized jurisdiction, and referring to and absorbing the mode of extraterritorial administrative litigation jurisdiction, we can explore the final idea of completing the reform of cross-district centralized jurisdiction of administrative litigation, that is, to establish administrative courts.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前10條

1 程琥;;行政案件跨行政區(qū)域集中管轄與行政審判體制改革[J];法律適用;2016年08期

2 周興復(fù);;行政案件相對(duì)集中管轄的實(shí)踐與影響——以樂山為視角[J];中共樂山市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2016年02期

3 沈開舉;方澗;;行政訴訟異地管轄制度實(shí)證研究——以河南模式為樣本[J];河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年02期

4 董v，

本文編號(hào)：2388179