發(fā)布時間：2018-12-19 14:13

【摘要】：刑事附帶民事訴訟制度是我國刑事立法中的重要內容，是刑事司法救濟途徑之一，自我國《刑事訴訟法》制定以來，就已確立，在保護被害人民事權益，減輕當事人訴累，避免司法資源浪費等方面發(fā)揮了一定的積極作用。隨著司法實踐的逐步深入，司法理念的不斷深化，個人權利意識的迅速覺醒，附帶民事訴訟制度的內在矛盾日漸凸顯，暴露出一系列的現實問題，甚至越演越烈，嚴重背離了其立法初衷。刑事附帶民事訴訟制度這種矛盾重重的制度現實，已經無法通過制度完善的方式來徹底消除。綜觀域外法治國家的立法現狀，刑、民分離已成為一種國際趨勢，為維護法律的統(tǒng)一性和權威性、保障被害人和被告人的合法權利、保障訴訟程序的科學性，本文提出貫徹刑民分離的理念，廢止刑事附帶民事訴訟制度。 文章除引言和結語外共四部分。第一部分對域外法治國家刑事被害人民事侵權賠償問題的立法模式作簡要概述，介紹了我國附帶民事訴訟制度立法概況及存在的問題，并簡單的概括法學界對該制度的改革主張。第二部分全面分析我國刑事附帶民事訴訟制度的內在矛盾沖突，從刑事訴訟與民事訴訟的矛盾、刑事附帶民事訴訟與刑事訴訟的矛盾、刑事附帶民事訴訟與民事訴訟的矛盾以及刑事附帶民事訴訟的內部矛盾四個方面詳細解讀現行該制度矛盾重重的制度現實，從制度層面上對其提出質疑與抨擊。第三部分具體介紹我國刑事附帶民事訴訟制度面臨的實踐困境，具體從當事人合法權益得不到保障，調解在刑事附帶民事訴訟中的功能異化兩個方面說明我國刑事附帶民事訴訟制度在實際運行中逐漸暴露出的問題。最后一部分主要是設計一套適合我國國情的犯罪民事?lián)p害賠償制度，在立足我國司法實際并借鑒域外相關成功法治經驗的基礎上，提出從完善刑事和解制度中被害人權益的保障和犯罪賠償民事訴訟制度以及構建刑事被害人國家補償制度三方面解決刑事被害人民事賠償問題的可行性方案，以確保被害人的合法權利得到全面保護，實現訴訟程序科學化。
[Abstract]:The system of criminal incidental civil action is an important part of criminal legislation and one of the ways of criminal judicial relief. Since the establishment of Criminal procedure Law, it has been established to protect the civil rights and interests of the victims and to alleviate the litigants' burden. To avoid the waste of judicial resources and other aspects have played a positive role. With the deepening of judicial practice, the deepening of judicial idea, the rapid awakening of individual consciousness of right, the inherent contradiction of incidental civil litigation system is becoming more and more prominent, which exposes a series of realistic problems, even more and more serious. It deviates from its legislative intention seriously. Criminal incidental civil procedure system, which is full of contradictions, can not be completely eliminated by perfect system. In order to safeguard the unity and authority of the law, the legal rights of the victims and the defendants, and the scientific nature of the proceedings, the separation of punishment and the people has become an international trend. This article puts forward to carry out the concept of separation of criminal and civilian and abolish the system of criminal incidental civil action. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, there are four parts. The first part gives a brief overview of the legislative model of tort compensation for criminal victims in extra-territorial countries ruled by law, and introduces the legislative overview and existing problems of the system of incidental civil proceedings in China. And a brief summary of the legal circles of the reform of the system. The second part comprehensively analyzes the inherent contradictions and conflicts in the system of criminal incidental civil action, from the contradictions between criminal proceedings and civil proceedings, and between criminal incidental civil proceedings and criminal proceedings. The contradiction between the criminal incidental civil action and the internal contradiction between the criminal incidental civil action and the internal contradiction of the criminal incidental civil action are analyzed in detail, and the system reality of the current system is analyzed in detail, and it is questioned and criticized from the system level. The third part concretely introduces the practical dilemma that our criminal incidental civil litigation system faces, specifically from the parties' legitimate rights and interests can not be protected. The dissimilation of the function of mediation in the criminal incidental civil action illustrates the problems gradually exposed in the actual operation of our country's criminal incidental civil action system. The last part is mainly to design a suit of criminal civil damage compensation system suitable for our country's national conditions, based on the judicial practice of our country and the experience of the successful rule of law in foreign countries. The feasible scheme to solve the problem of civil compensation for criminal victims is put forward from three aspects: perfecting the protection of victims' rights and interests in the criminal reconciliation system, the civil litigation system of criminal compensation and the construction of national compensation system for criminal victims. In order to ensure that the legal rights of victims are fully protected, the realization of scientific proceedings.
【學位授予單位】：湘潭大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 奚瑋,葉良芳;刑事附帶民事訴訟制度的反思[J];安徽師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2003年01期

2 鄭丁足;對刑事附帶民事訴訟的再思考[J];福建公安高等�？茖W校學報.社會公共安全研究;2002年03期

3 葛先園;試論刑事附帶民事訴訟剝離刑事訴訟的必然性[J];福建公安高等專科學校學報;2004年01期

4 雷小政;;刑事和解配套制度的實證分析與立法完善[J];法學雜志;2009年07期

5 陶明;馬建馨;;改革刑事附帶民事訴訟制度若干問題研究[J];法學雜志;2009年11期

6 甄貞;申飛飛;;附帶民事訴訟的困境與出路——以刑事和解為視角[J];法學雜志;2011年10期

7 麥苗;;淺談廢除附帶民事訴訟的依據——從三方結構看刑事附帶民事訴訟制度[J];法制與社會;2008年17期

8 鄭天鋒;;反思與祛魅:我國刑事附帶民事訴訟制度重構論[J];甘肅政法學院學報;2011年02期

9 廖永安,王春;我國民事與刑事交叉案件的協(xié)調處理[J];華東政法學院學報;2005年02期

10 倪云;;論我國刑事附帶民事訴訟制度的廢除與保留——以價值分析為視角[J];經濟與社會發(fā)展;2010年07期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 吳淼;刑事被害人國家補償制度研究[D];吉林大學;2012年

，

本文編號：2387036