【摘要】：作為調(diào)查收集證據(jù)的主體之一的法院,職權(quán)調(diào)查取證是其行使審判職權(quán)應(yīng)有的內(nèi)容,也是民事訴訟當(dāng)中證據(jù)調(diào)查收集制度的重要組成部分。對此,民事相關(guān)法律也作出了明確規(guī)定。伴隨著司法改革新舉措的不斷向前推進(jìn)以及訴訟理念向當(dāng)事人主義的逐漸靠近與轉(zhuǎn)變,人民法院調(diào)查取證的職權(quán)不斷被弱化,職權(quán)調(diào)查取證的范圍也不斷被限縮,顯然這是符合辯論主義原則要求的。但是,過分地對人民法院職權(quán)調(diào)查取證的權(quán)力予以限制也背離了人民法院作為發(fā)現(xiàn)真實(shí)的主體之一運(yùn)用相關(guān)民事法律在遵循程序的基礎(chǔ)之上作出正確裁判的目標(biāo)和要求,產(chǎn)生了不少的負(fù)面影響,在理論界、實(shí)務(wù)界都激起了不少的爭論。因此,在司法改革的這一時(shí)代背景下對于民事訴訟中人民法院職權(quán)調(diào)查取證制度的進(jìn)一步深入研究是十分必要的。論文的引言部分對法院職權(quán)調(diào)查取證這一制度的國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀以及發(fā)展的趨勢進(jìn)行介紹,從而引出對法院職權(quán)調(diào)查取證制度研究的重要性。第一章通過對研究對象概念的界定以及對這一制度存在的價(jià)值進(jìn)行闡述,從而有利于對研究對象有一個(gè)更深入的認(rèn)識。第二章主要介紹人民法院職權(quán)調(diào)查取證制度的歷史發(fā)展、存在的主要問題以及對現(xiàn)狀成因的分析,有益于進(jìn)一步完善該制度。第三章通過對兩大法系的代表國家在這一制度上的考察,為人民法院職權(quán)調(diào)查取證制度的完善提供借鑒。第四章從制度層面以及思想層面提出了完善人民法院職權(quán)調(diào)查取證制度的幾點(diǎn)建議,本文通過對民事訴訟中人民法院職權(quán)調(diào)查取證范圍的進(jìn)一步界定并細(xì)致的分析,進(jìn)而對該制度的完善建議進(jìn)行了闡述。
[Abstract]:As one of the main body of investigation and collection of evidence, the court of power of investigation and collection of evidence is not only the content of its judicial authority, but also an important part of the system of collecting evidence in civil proceedings. To this, civil relevant law also made clear stipulation. With the development of new measures of judicial reform and the approaching and transformation of litigation idea to litigant doctrine, the power of the people's court to investigate and collect evidence has been continuously weakened, and the scope of the power of investigation and collection of evidence has been continuously restricted. Obviously this is in line with the principle of argumentalism. However, the excessive restriction on the power of the people's court to investigate and collect evidence deviates from the objective and requirement of the people's court as one of the subjects to discover the truth and to make the correct judgment on the basis of following the procedure by using the relevant civil law. Has produced a lot of negative influence, in the theory circle, the practice domain has aroused a lot of debate. Therefore, under the background of judicial reform, it is necessary to further study the system of investigation and collection of evidence in civil litigation. The introduction of this paper introduces the current research situation and the development trend of the system of court power investigation and evidence collection at home and abroad, which leads to the importance of the research on the system of court power investigation and evidence collection. The first chapter defines the concept of the object of study and expounds the value of the system, which is conducive to a deeper understanding of the object of study. The second chapter mainly introduces the historical development of the system of investigation and collection of evidence in the power of the people's court, the main problems existing and the analysis of the causes of the present situation, which is beneficial to the further improvement of the system. The third chapter through the two legal system on behalf of the country in this system to provide a reference for the people's court authority investigation and collection of evidence system. The fourth chapter puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the system of investigation and collection of evidence in the people's court from the system level and the ideological level. This paper defines the scope of the investigation and collection of evidence of the people's court in the civil litigation and makes a detailed analysis of the scope of the investigation and collection of evidence by the people's court. Furthermore, the suggestion of perfecting the system is expounded.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李政;;對我國法院收集調(diào)查證據(jù)制度的探析[J];民事程序法研究;2015年01期

2 王云;;規(guī)范民事訴訟中法院調(diào)查取證之淺析[J];品牌;2015年06期

3 周健宇;;論民事訴訟中法院調(diào)查取證制度之完善——基于實(shí)證分析與比較法的考察[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2014年05期

4 縱博;;對法官依職權(quán)調(diào)查取證若干理論問題的澄清[J];法律適用;2013年10期

5 肖建華;宋芳;;法院職權(quán)調(diào)查證據(jù)的程序意義與立法完善[J];天津法學(xué);2011年03期

6 李浩;;回歸民事訴訟法——法院依職權(quán)調(diào)查取證的再改革[J];法學(xué)家;2011年03期

7 公丕祥;;當(dāng)代中國能動(dòng)司法的意義分析[J];江蘇社會科學(xué);2010年05期

8 韓波;;論證據(jù)收集力強(qiáng)弱與證明責(zé)任輕重[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2009年02期

9 湯嘯天;張進(jìn)德;江晨;梁玉超;;調(diào)查令制度的法律屬性與完善建議[J];法律適用;2008年07期

10 熊躍敏;;辯論主義:溯源與變遷——民事訴訟中當(dāng)事人與法院作用分擔(dān)的再思考[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2007年02期

，

本文編號：2384871