【摘要】：司法拍賣輔助工作機構是執(zhí)行權社會化運行的產(chǎn)物,承擔了本應由法院直接行使的部分司法拍賣權。法院與拍賣輔助工作機構之間是公權力委托關系,法院委托拍賣輔助工作機構從事拍賣輔助工作的協(xié)議是公法契約。拍賣輔助工作機構根據(jù)法院的委托行使執(zhí)行權,其行為產(chǎn)生的后果由法院承擔�；诜謸鷪�(zhí)行工作量與防止司法腐敗的現(xiàn)實考量,法院將拍賣輔助工作委托給社會機構來完成,其背后的法理依據(jù)是民事執(zhí)行的社會參與和執(zhí)行效益原則。應當將法院委托社會機構承擔拍賣輔助工作與委托拍賣區(qū)分開來,明確各參與主體的行為責任。同時,應堅持"嚴格準入條件""規(guī)范選定程序""重視過程監(jiān)管""強化事后懲罰"等原則,不斷健全和完善拍賣輔助工作機構的選定和監(jiān)管制度。
[Abstract]:The auxiliary working organization of judicial auction is the product of socialized operation of executive power, which bears part of the judicial auction right which should be exercised directly by the court. There is a public power entrustment relationship between the court and the auction auxiliary working organization, and the agreement that the court entrusts the auction auxiliary working organization to engage in the auction auxiliary work is a public law contract. The auxiliary auction agency shall exercise the executive power according to the commission of the court, and the consequences of the act shall be borne by the court. Based on the realistic consideration of sharing the execution workload and preventing judicial corruption, the court entrusts the auxiliary work of auction to the social organization to complete, and the legal basis behind it is the principle of social participation and execution benefit of civil execution. It is necessary to distinguish the court entrusting social institutions with the ancillary work of auction and entrusting auction to clarify the responsibility of each participating subject. At the same time, we should adhere to the principles of "strict access conditions", "normalize the selection procedure", "attach importance to process supervision" and "strengthen punishment after the event", and constantly improve and perfect the selection and supervision system of the auxiliary working institutions of auction.
【作者單位】： 西南政法大學;重慶市高級人民法院執(zhí)行局;重慶市第二中級人民法院執(zhí)行局;
【分類號】：D925.1

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李琳;;購買司法拍賣物業(yè)的風險及對策[J];上海房地;2011年04期

2 丁軍;;網(wǎng)絡司法拍賣相關法律問題探討[J];東方企業(yè)文化;2013年15期

3 徐舟;;推行司法網(wǎng)拍 提升司法公信——從法的價值角度證成網(wǎng)絡司法拍賣合理性[J];法制與社會;2013年28期

4 喬曉;;重慶:司法拍賣進入產(chǎn)權市場[J];產(chǎn)權導刊;2009年04期

5 朱薇;;重慶力破司法拍賣暴利鏈[J];w，

本文編號：2379285