【摘要】：我國引進(jìn)錄音錄像制度的時(shí)間并不長。但是，就目前而言，錄音錄像制度在刑事司法實(shí)踐得到了廣泛的應(yīng)用。從整體上看，錄音錄像制度的應(yīng)用，給司法法治帶來的利大于弊。但是該制度尚未完全成形，現(xiàn)行的規(guī)范也無法使該制度發(fā)揮最大的作用，同時(shí)在理論層面對該制度進(jìn)一步的完善也缺乏相應(yīng)的指導(dǎo)。從上世紀(jì)90年代開始，錄音錄像制度廣泛應(yīng)用于各類案件的偵辦，期間出現(xiàn)的問題頗多，筆者對這些問題進(jìn)行了總結(jié)和分析。 分析問題，是為了在實(shí)踐中更好的將其完善。針對這一制度的完善，筆者提出了自己的想法：首先，錄音錄像制度的意義是十分重大的，所以該制度毫無疑問是要納入現(xiàn)行法的范疇。其次，在該制度的設(shè)計(jì)上，筆者對主要國家和地區(qū)的相關(guān)制度進(jìn)行了考察和總結(jié)，將值得我國借鑒的地方予以了重點(diǎn)的陳述。此外，筆者還對我國該制度運(yùn)行的現(xiàn)狀及重點(diǎn)問題進(jìn)行了逐一的分析。最后，筆者根據(jù)上述的考察和分析，提出了錄音錄像在制度層面的改革思路以及在現(xiàn)行法律規(guī)定之下該制度實(shí)踐運(yùn)行需要注意的地方。 在制度層面的改革思路，，筆者提出了如下的方案：首先，在錄音錄像的規(guī)范范圍上，借鑒美國、香港等國家（地區(qū)）相關(guān)制度的規(guī)定，擴(kuò)大應(yīng)當(dāng)錄音錄像案件的范圍。其次，在錄音錄像的操作程序上，筆者借鑒了的臺(tái)灣和英國的相關(guān)制度規(guī)定，第一，應(yīng)當(dāng)將錄制的畫面要求予以制度化。第二，應(yīng)當(dāng)完善非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則。最后，要規(guī)范錄音錄像制度的監(jiān)督系統(tǒng)。第一，要保證大多數(shù)時(shí)候的錄音場所——看守所保持絕對的中立，第二，盡可能的引進(jìn)訊問錄音錄像律師在場制度，第三，建立中立的第三方的錄音錄像材料保存機(jī)構(gòu)。 在實(shí)踐層面，現(xiàn)行的法律制度不可能立即更改，所以為了保障錄音錄像制度能夠順利的運(yùn)行，在現(xiàn)行的法律制度之下，筆者強(qiáng)調(diào)了以下幾點(diǎn)：第一，要全程的進(jìn)行錄音錄像。第二，實(shí)踐操作時(shí)，確保錄音錄像程序一定要合理，例如，履行告知義務(wù)，細(xì)節(jié)之處要做到盡善盡美等等。第三，努力完善錄音錄像的救濟(jì)途徑。鼓勵(lì)律師及犯罪嫌疑人對偵查訊問機(jī)關(guān)的不當(dāng)行為提出申訴及控告。
[Abstract]:The introduction of audio and video recording system in China is not long. However, at present, audio and video recording system has been widely used in criminal justice practice. On the whole, the application of audio and video recording system brings more advantages than disadvantages to the administration of justice. However, the system has not been fully formed, the current norms can not make the system play the greatest role, at the same time in the theoretical level to further improve the system is also lack of corresponding guidance. Since the 1990s, audio and video recording system has been widely used in the investigation and handling of various cases, during which there are many problems. The author summarizes and analyzes these problems. The purpose of analyzing problems is to perfect them better in practice. In view of the perfection of this system, the author puts forward his own idea: firstly, the significance of audio and video recording system is very great, so the system is undoubtedly to be brought into the scope of current law. Secondly, in the design of the system, the author reviews and summarizes the relevant systems of the major countries and regions, and makes a key statement of the places that our country can learn from. In addition, the author analyzes the current situation and key problems of the system in China one by one. Finally, according to the above investigation and analysis, the author puts forward the reform ideas of audio and video recording at the system level and the points needing attention in practice operation of the system under the current law. At the system level, the author puts forward the following proposals: first, in the standard range of audio and video recording, draw lessons from the relevant systems of the United States, Hong Kong and other countries (regions), expand the scope of audio and video cases. Secondly, in the operation procedure of audio and video recording, the author draws lessons from the relevant regulations of Taiwan and Britain. First, the requirement of recording picture should be institutionalized. Second, we should perfect the exclusion rules of illegal evidence. Finally, to standardize the system of audio and video surveillance system. First, to ensure that most of the recording place-detention center to remain absolutely neutral, second, as far as possible to introduce the presence of audiovisual lawyers, third, the establishment of neutral third party audio and video material preservation institutions. In practice, the current legal system can not be changed immediately, so in order to ensure the sound and video recording system can run smoothly, under the current legal system, the author emphasized the following points: first, the whole process of audio and video recording. Second, in practice, make sure that audio and video recording procedures must be reasonable, for example, fulfill the obligation to inform, the details should be perfect and so on. Third, try to perfect the relief ways of audio and video recording. Lawyers and suspects are encouraged to lodge complaints and charges against misconduct by investigative and interrogation agencies.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 沈德詠;何艷芳;;論全程錄音錄像制度的科學(xué)構(gòu)建[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2012年02期

2 郝宏奎;偵查訊問改革與發(fā)展構(gòu)想[J];法學(xué);2004年10期

3 魏紅梅;;淺談刑事訴訟中的控辯平衡問題——重點(diǎn)談偵查階段控辯平衡的問題[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年09期

4 梁光明;;淺論全程錄音錄像證據(jù)的彈劾性[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年25期

5 李寶字;張麗敏;;我國偵查訊問程序的法治化[J];河北公安警察職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年04期

6 王金華;;論偵查訊問全程同步錄音錄像制度的完善[J];廣州市公安管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

7 羊震;;論錄音錄像制度良性運(yùn)行之保障[J];法律適用;2012年10期

8 高一飛;祝繼萍;;英國庭審錄音錄像改革的新動(dòng)向[J];法治研究;2013年01期

9 郭志遠(yuǎn);;我國訊問錄音錄像證據(jù)規(guī)則研究[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年01期

10 林哲;;論我國偵查訊問錄音錄像制度的問題及完善[J];安徽科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年02期

本文編號(hào)：2378164