論我國刑事執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督制度的完善
[Abstract]:Criminal execution is an activity that the legal specialized organs of the state put into practice the contents of the criminal adjudication instrument which has been made by the court. The people's Procuratorate is the legal supervision organ of our country, also is the legal criminal execution supervision organ. The procuratorial supervision of criminal execution can protect the lawful rights and interests of the criminal executor, promote the justice of the criminal execution, prevent the corruption of the criminal execution, and improve the efficiency of the criminal execution. It is of great significance to realize the function and purpose of punishment. Although the Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China, as amended in 2012, has strengthened the functions of the people's Procuratorate in the supervision of criminal execution, however, There are still some problems, such as the operation of the procuratorial supervision procedure of criminal execution is not strong, the setting of the supervision organization is unreasonable, the supervision time is lagging behind, and the supervision means are not rigid enough, and so on. The purpose of this paper is to draw lessons from the successful experience of foreign criminal execution procuratorial supervision, and to provide theoretical reference for the perfection of our criminal execution procuratorial supervision system. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part explains the meaning, characteristics and significance of the procuratorial supervision of criminal execution, and lays a theoretical foundation for the research of the thesis. The second part examines the procuratorial supervision system of criminal execution in Germany, France, Japan, Russia and Taiwan. On the basis of comparison, the author points out the significance of the system of procuratorial supervision of foreign criminal execution to our country. The third part, analyzes the main problems existing in the procuratorial supervision system of criminal execution in China, and explores the main reasons leading to the problems. The fourth part, from determining the scope of the procuratorial supervision of criminal execution, optimizing the criminal execution supervision organ of the people's procuratorate, establishing a procuratorial supervision mechanism synchronized with the criminal execution, The author puts forward four suggestions on how to perfect the procuratorial supervision system of criminal execution in four aspects: strengthening the intensity of procuratorial supervision of criminal execution.
【學位授予單位】:華中師范大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:D925.2
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 戴承歡;蔡永彤;;駐監(jiān)檢察監(jiān)督抗訴案件的實證研究——以駐北新涇監(jiān)獄檢察室2005—2009年抗訴案件為視角[J];北京政法職業(yè)學院學報;2010年02期
2 朱立恒;;我國刑事檢察監(jiān)督制度改革初探——以刑事檢察監(jiān)督的彈性化為中心[J];法學評論;2010年01期
3 徐靜村;;減刑、假釋制度改革若干問題研究[J];法治研究;2010年02期
4 徐銘周;莫林芳;;健全完善刑罰執(zhí)行監(jiān)督機制的問題研究[J];傳承;2010年09期
5 楊必軍;;監(jiān)外執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督機制研究[J];傳承;2010年09期
6 黃欽貴;;關(guān)于加強檢察機關(guān)對刑事偵查監(jiān)督的思考[J];廣西大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2007年S2期
7 楊紅文;何文凱;;監(jiān)禁刑執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督的現(xiàn)實困境及進路——以《囚犯待遇最低限度標準規(guī)則》為視角[J];西部法學評論;2010年04期
8 陳官;;試論刑事變更執(zhí)行程序的行政性傾向及其司法化歸位——以減刑、假釋程序為研究起點[J];廣西政法管理干部學院學報;2008年04期
9 韓哲;;論我國刑事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督的完善——以刑訴法修改為視角[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年02期
10 劉方;;檢察機關(guān)對減刑、假釋程序監(jiān)督的立法完善[J];西南政法大學學報;2010年01期
,本文編號:2374129
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2374129.html