【摘要】：刑事第二審程序作為審判的終結(jié)程序，已成為我國(guó)兩審終審制訴訟程序不可缺少的組成部分，成為監(jiān)督一審程序的有力措施，為當(dāng)事人提供了有效救濟(jì)途徑。人民法院通過(guò)二審程序，依法對(duì)部分一審尚未發(fā)生法律效力的裁判進(jìn)行改判，其目的是糾正一審錯(cuò)誤裁判，確保判決的公平、公正。但是，一些公眾由此對(duì)二審法院改判產(chǎn)生一種誤解——認(rèn)為一審為“錯(cuò)案”。公眾能否正確認(rèn)識(shí)改判的法律意義，關(guān)乎司法的權(quán)威，也關(guān)系到法院的形象，一審判決能否贏得公眾的信任。 刑事二審對(duì)一審判決的處理方式為：維持原判、直接改判、發(fā)回重審，改判是審判獨(dú)立和法官自由裁量權(quán)的體現(xiàn)。本文首先介紹了刑事二審改判的概念和特點(diǎn)，分析其法律意義；其次，研究了國(guó)外的刑事二審的處理方式，闡述刑事二審改判存在的理論依據(jù)及國(guó)外改判的優(yōu)點(diǎn)；第三，分析我國(guó)刑事二審改判的現(xiàn)狀及存在的問(wèn)題，并指出我國(guó)妨礙刑事二審改判的機(jī)制；第四，闡述公眾對(duì)我國(guó)刑事二審改判的觀念，并說(shuō)明改判屬正常司法現(xiàn)象的原因；第五，根據(jù)我國(guó)刑事二審改判存在的問(wèn)題，提出一些建議，以便完善我國(guó)刑事二審改判制度，，消除公眾的誤解，正確認(rèn)識(shí)二審改判的法律意義，從而還一審法官“清白”。
[Abstract]:As the final procedure of the trial, the criminal second instance procedure has become an indispensable part of the two-instance final procedure in our country. It has become a powerful measure to supervise the first instance procedure, and has provided an effective remedy for the parties concerned. Through the procedure of second instance, the people's court corrects the judgment which has not yet had legal effect in part of the first instance according to law, the purpose of which is to correct the wrong judgment of the first instance and to ensure the fairness and justice of the judgment. However, some members of the public have misinterpreted the second instance court's revision as a "wrong case" at first instance. Whether the public can correctly understand the legal significance of the revision is related to the judicial authority and the image of the court, and whether the first-instance decision can win the public's trust. The way to deal with the judgment of the first instance in the second instance of criminal trial is to maintain the original judgment, to change the sentence directly, to send it back to trial, and to revise the sentence is the embodiment of the independence of the trial and the discretion of the judge. This paper first introduces the concept and characteristics of criminal second instance revision, analyzes its legal significance, secondly, studies the treatment of foreign criminal second instance, expounds the theoretical basis of criminal second instance revision and the advantages of foreign revision. Third, analyzes the present situation and existing problems of the second criminal trial revision in our country, and points out the mechanism that our country obstructs the criminal second instance revision; fourth, expounds the public's concept of the criminal second instance revision in our country, and explains the reason why the revision is a normal judicial phenomenon. Fifthly, according to the problems existing in the revision of the second criminal trial in our country, some suggestions are put forward in order to perfect the system of the revision of the second instance in our country, eliminate the misunderstanding of the public, correctly understand the legal significance of the revision of the second instance, and then return the judge of first instance to "innocence".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 侯學(xué)勇;;司法修辭方法在社會(huì)正義實(shí)現(xiàn)中的作用[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2012年01期

2 王超;;刑事二審發(fā)回重審制度的功能異化:從救濟(jì)到懲罰[J];政治與法律;2011年11期

3 邢冰;;量刑規(guī)范化改革對(duì)二審刑期改判影響之實(shí)證分析[J];法學(xué)論壇;2011年04期

4 中國(guó)刑事二審程序改革與完善課題組;封利強(qiáng);;關(guān)于我國(guó)刑事二審程序運(yùn)行情況的調(diào)研報(bào)告[J];刑事司法論壇;2010年00期

5 張小虎;;我國(guó)死刑裁量的法理分析——孫偉銘死刑案二審改判的具體展開(kāi)[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)研究;2010年01期

6 王冬云;陳增寶;;理性地對(duì)待刑事二審改判——對(duì)現(xiàn)行錯(cuò)案追究制的反思[J];法治研究;2009年12期

7 張健英;;關(guān)于刑事二審幾個(gè)問(wèn)題的探討[J];中共樂(lè)山市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2009年05期

8 林孝文;;法官自由裁量權(quán)的法社會(huì)學(xué)分析[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)家;2009年06期

9 易延友;;我國(guó)刑事審級(jí)制度的建構(gòu)與反思[J];法學(xué)研究;2009年03期

10 劉根菊;封利強(qiáng);;論刑事第二審程序的審判范圍——以程序功能為視角[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2008年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 吳建雄;中國(guó)二元司法模式研究[D];中南大學(xué);2012年

2 尹麗華;刑事上訴制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 趙瑞敏;對(duì)刑事二審發(fā)回重審的反思[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

2 馬云雪;論刑事訴訟二審發(fā)回重審制度[D];廣西民族大學(xué);2010年

3 崔巍;死刑二審審理方式改革研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

4 董昆;刑事二審抗訴的現(xiàn)狀與反思[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

5 張斌;二審因一審程序違法發(fā)回重審研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

6 李良富;刑事審級(jí)制度研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2003年

本文編號(hào)：2369874