【摘要】：行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴自出現(xiàn)以來(lái),不論在我國(guó)的理論界還是實(shí)務(wù)界都起著至關(guān)重要的作用。新修訂的《行政訴訟法》第三條明確將行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴以法律形式確定下來(lái)。一方面,行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴的完善是建立法治政府,貫徹依法治國(guó),推動(dòng)司法改革進(jìn)程中至關(guān)重要的一環(huán);另一方面,行政首長(zhǎng)參與到行政訴訟中來(lái),不僅有利于推動(dòng)司法改革的縱深,也有利于在行政訴訟中建立一個(gè)完整的訴訟權(quán)利義務(wù)關(guān)系。所以對(duì)行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴的研究具有理論價(jià)值和實(shí)踐意義必要性。本文共分為四個(gè)部分:第一部分,論述了行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴的一般理論。明確界定了行政首長(zhǎng)出庭的內(nèi)涵,分析了行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴與行政訴訟代理的區(qū)別,并進(jìn)一步分析了行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴的意義。第二部分,梳理了我國(guó)行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴的現(xiàn)狀及存在的問(wèn)題。實(shí)踐中,行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴已經(jīng)較為平常,但仍然存在一些亟需解決的問(wèn)題,如行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴的案件范圍不明確、行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴率總體不高、各地行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴不平衡、行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴表現(xiàn)形式化等。第三部分,分析了我國(guó)行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴存在問(wèn)題的原因。主要從法律制度原因、行政首長(zhǎng)原因、司法環(huán)境原因及地區(qū)差異原因四個(gè)方面進(jìn)行分析,旨在從中發(fā)現(xiàn)改善當(dāng)前行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴實(shí)效的突破口從而在制度層面和運(yùn)行層面提出應(yīng)對(duì)措施。第四部分,對(duì)推進(jìn)行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴提出若干構(gòu)想。針對(duì)我國(guó)行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴存在的問(wèn)題及其原因,提出應(yīng)當(dāng)采取措施推進(jìn)行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴。具體包括:明確行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴的案件范圍,具體規(guī)定應(yīng)當(dāng)出庭應(yīng)訴的情形和不應(yīng)當(dāng)出庭應(yīng)訴的情形;采取措施提高行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴的實(shí)效;建立行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴的司法程序保障機(jī)制;完善行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴的監(jiān)督與問(wèn)責(zé)機(jī)制;優(yōu)化外部司法環(huán)境和創(chuàng)建地區(qū)交流平臺(tái)與跨地區(qū)考評(píng)機(jī)制等。
[Abstract]:Since the appearance of the chief executive in court, both theoretical and practical circles in China have played a vital role. Article 3 of the newly revised Administrative procedure Law makes it clear that the chief executive should appear in court in the form of law. On the one hand, the perfection of the chief executive appearing in court is a crucial link in the process of establishing the government ruled by law, running the country according to law and promoting the judicial reform. On the other hand, the participation of executive heads in administrative proceedings is not only conducive to promoting the depth of judicial reform, but also conducive to the establishment of a complete relationship between litigation rights and obligations in administrative litigation. Therefore, the research of the chief executive appearing in court is of theoretical value and practical significance. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part discusses the general theory of chief executive appearing in court. This paper clearly defines the connotation of the administrative head appearing in court, analyzes the difference between the administrative head appearing in court and the administrative litigation agent, and further analyzes the significance of the administrative head appearing in court. The second part, combs our country executive head to appear in court to answer the lawsuit the present situation and the existence question. In practice, it is common for the executive head to appear in court, but there are still some problems that need to be solved. For example, the scope of the case appearing before the court is not clear, and the rate of appearing in court is not high. The appearance of the chief executive in court is unbalanced, and the appearance of the chief executive in court is formalized and so on. In the third part, the author analyzes the reasons of the problems in the appearance of the chief executive in court. Mainly from the legal system reason, the executive head reason, the judicial environment reason and the region difference reason four aspects carries on the analysis, The purpose of this paper is to find a breakthrough to improve the effectiveness of administrative heads' appearance in court so as to put forward countermeasures at the level of system and operation. The fourth part, puts forward some ideas to promote the executive head to appear in court. In view of the problems and reasons of the chief executive appearing in court in our country, the author puts forward that measures should be taken to promote the appearance of the executive head in court. It includes: defining the scope of the cases where the executive head should appear in court, specifying the circumstances in which he should appear in court and not appearing in court; taking measures to improve the effectiveness of the appearance of the executive head in court; To establish the judicial procedure guarantee mechanism for the administrative head to appear in court; to perfect the supervision and accountability mechanism of the administrative head to appear in court; to optimize the external judicial environment and to create a regional exchange platform and cross-regional evaluation mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：海南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張雙山;楊美安;唐真興;;出庭應(yīng)訴 城口縣長(zhǎng)敢于“吃螃蟹”[J];公民導(dǎo)刊;2008年10期

2 張育仁;;讓官員出庭應(yīng)訴成為法治社會(huì)常態(tài)[J];公民導(dǎo)刊;2014年06期

3 陽(yáng)明武;行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴的意義[J];政府法制;2003年21期

4 一孔;;云南首例一把手出庭應(yīng)訴案原告敗訴[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(上半月);2008年05期

5 許圣榮;倪恩良;季宏;;行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴的實(shí)踐與探索[J];中國(guó)工商管理研究;2008年12期

6 王應(yīng)強(qiáng);;論建立行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴制度[J];學(xué)習(xí)論壇;2008年04期

7 賀冠斐;;構(gòu)建行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴制度管見(jiàn)[J];南陽(yáng)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期

8 ;江蘇 國(guó)土資源廳領(lǐng)導(dǎo)首次出庭應(yīng)訴[J];資源與人居環(huán)境;2008年12期

9 盧國(guó)偉;趙會(huì)平;;河南南陽(yáng)推行行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴制度[J];中國(guó)審判;2008年07期

10 姜忠惠;姜福信;王喜英;;水行政機(jī)關(guān)出庭應(yīng)訴要點(diǎn)[J];黑龍江水利科技;2009年03期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 黎軍;楊惠宇;;制度設(shè)計(jì)與制度實(shí)踐——行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴的實(shí)證研究[A];全國(guó)法院第25屆學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)獲獎(jiǎng)?wù)撐募汗痉ㄅc行政法實(shí)施問(wèn)題研究（下冊(cè)）[C];2013年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 柏佳春　龔永泉;南通推行行政負(fù)責(zé)人出庭應(yīng)訴制度[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

2 《中國(guó)司法》副總編輯 劉武俊;“一把手”出庭應(yīng)訴亟需制度化[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

3 記者 衛(wèi)建萍　通訊員 董燕靜;積極倡導(dǎo)行政領(lǐng)導(dǎo)出庭應(yīng)訴[N];人民法院報(bào);2009年

4 記者 付洪軍　見(jiàn)習(xí)記者 胡細(xì)鶯;“民告官”一把手須出庭應(yīng)訴[N];珠海特區(qū)報(bào);2009年

5 記者 何清平;“逼”行政一把手出庭應(yīng)訴[N];重慶日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

6 魏文彪;局長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴 扯不上“人人平等”[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2004年

7 劉武俊;一把手出庭應(yīng)訴倒逼依法行政[N];福建日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

8 本報(bào)記者 裴智勇;江蘇海安7年206位行政領(lǐng)導(dǎo)出庭應(yīng)訴[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

9 記者 張寬明 通訊員 顧成勇;江蘇海安縣長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴“民告官”案[N];人民法院報(bào);2012年

10 海門市悅來(lái)鎮(zhèn)政府 洪玲艷;縣長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴的標(biāo)本意義[N];南通日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 張怡晴;行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴制度的理性認(rèn)識(shí)[D];中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院;2014年

2 孟靜;延邊地區(qū)行政機(jī)關(guān)負(fù)責(zé)人出庭應(yīng)訴形式化現(xiàn)象探究[D];延邊大學(xué);2016年

3 宋旭;論行政訴訟被告負(fù)責(zé)人出庭應(yīng)訴制度[D];湘潭大學(xué);2016年

4 王雪;S縣行政首長(zhǎng)出庭應(yīng)訴情況調(diào)研報(bào)告[D];遼寧大學(xué);2016年

5 謝麗華;行政機(jī)關(guān)負(fù)責(zé)人出庭應(yīng)訴制度研究[D];廣西民族大學(xué);2016年

6 陳玉香;我國(guó)行政機(jī)關(guān)負(fù)責(zé)人出庭應(yīng)訴制度研究[D];新疆大學(xué);2017年

7 徐夢(mèng)，

本文編號(hào)：2367202