【摘要】：指定居所監(jiān)視居住是指限制被監(jiān)視居住人在規(guī)定期限內(nèi)不得離開(kāi)指定的居所,并對(duì)其行為加以監(jiān)視、限制其人身自由的一種強(qiáng)制措施。該制度系正當(dāng)性強(qiáng)制措施,其存在不僅使我國(guó)強(qiáng)制措施體系更完善、更合理,還能有效推進(jìn)反腐工作,但由于充分發(fā)揮指定居所監(jiān)視居住制度的司法實(shí)用性較難、適用指定居所監(jiān)視居住特別容易招引負(fù)面評(píng)價(jià)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。2012年《中華人民共和國(guó)刑事訴訟法修正案》在深入調(diào)研和周密論證的基礎(chǔ)上,吸納了諸多法學(xué)家們和學(xué)者們的研究成果,對(duì)指定居所監(jiān)視居住的立法做了較大的修改,更符合我國(guó)國(guó)情。但在司法實(shí)踐中適用指定居所監(jiān)視居住強(qiáng)制措施仍存在以下四個(gè)方面的困惑：理解與適用的條件難以把握、執(zhí)行場(chǎng)所不確定與隨意性、變更為逮捕較隨意、執(zhí)行監(jiān)督效果不佳。諸多工作盲點(diǎn)和實(shí)踐難點(diǎn)出現(xiàn)的原因主要是法律規(guī)定不明確、對(duì)法律規(guī)定的理解存在分歧和偏差。上述問(wèn)題導(dǎo)致在司法實(shí)踐中適用指定居所監(jiān)視居住不僅使辦案安全、合法處于不確定狀態(tài),而且極易使指定居所監(jiān)視居住強(qiáng)制措施背上“渣子洞”的負(fù)面評(píng)價(jià)。為此,應(yīng)該轉(zhuǎn)變執(zhí)法理念,完善適用指定居所監(jiān)視居住的相關(guān)制度,包括嚴(yán)格把握適用的條件、明確執(zhí)行場(chǎng)所和執(zhí)行方式、強(qiáng)化監(jiān)督意識(shí)和監(jiān)督措施的落實(shí)、明確實(shí)施監(jiān)審分離制度、建立違規(guī)指定居所監(jiān)視居住的程序性制裁機(jī)制。通過(guò)這些措施的完善,解決適用指定居所監(jiān)視居住在司法實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的難以把握的新情況和新問(wèn)題,指導(dǎo)辦案,發(fā)揮該制度應(yīng)有的司法實(shí)用性。
[Abstract]:Designated residence monitoring is a kind of compulsory measure which restricts the person under surveillance from leaving the designated residence within a specified period of time, monitors his behavior and restricts his personal freedom. The existence of this system not only makes the system of coercive measures more perfect and reasonable, but also can effectively promote the anti-corruption work. However, it is difficult to give full play to the judicial practicability of the system of designated residence monitoring. The application of designated residence monitoring of residence is particularly apt to attract negative evaluation risks. The 2012 Criminal procedure Law Amendment of the people's Republic of China, on the basis of in-depth investigation and thorough argumentation, has absorbed the research results of many jurists and scholars. The legislation of designated residence monitoring has been amended, which is more in line with the situation of our country. However, in judicial practice, there are still four puzzles in the application of mandatory measures of residence monitoring in the judicial practice: the conditions of understanding and application are difficult to grasp, the place of execution is uncertain and arbitrary, the arrest is more arbitrary, and the effect of execution and supervision is not good. The main reasons for many blind spots and difficulties in practice are that the laws and regulations are not clear and there are differences and deviations in the understanding of the laws and regulations. The above problems lead to the application of designated residence monitoring residence in judicial practice, which not only makes the case safe and legal in uncertain state, but also easily makes the mandatory measure of designated residence surveillance bear the negative evaluation of "residual hole". To this end, we should change the concept of law enforcement, perfect the relevant system for monitoring and living in designated residences, including strictly grasping the applicable conditions, clarifying the place and mode of implementation, and strengthening the sense of supervision and the implementation of supervisory measures. Clear implementation of the system of separation of supervision and trial, establish a violation of designated residence monitoring of the procedural sanctions mechanism. Through the perfection of these measures, we can solve the new situation and new problems that appear in the judicial practice of applying designated residence surveillance, guide the case handling, and give full play to the judicial practicability of the system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 周偉,湯暉;從例外到尋常:英國(guó)的附和件保釋[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年12期

2 左衛(wèi)民;;指定監(jiān)視居住的制度性思考[J];法商研究;2012年03期

3 陳永生;刑事訴訟的程序性制裁[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2004年01期

4 余輝勝;;現(xiàn)行監(jiān)視居住制度的隱憂與省思[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2007年06期

5 卞建林;;我國(guó)刑事強(qiáng)制措施的功能回歸與制度完善[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2011年06期

6 ;1996年全國(guó)訴訟法學(xué)年會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)觀點(diǎn)綜述(刑事訴訟部分)[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);1997年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2335701