【摘要】：對于行政公益訴訟問題的研究,在學術(shù)界一直以來都熱度不減。其中,原告資格更是眾多學者研究的重點。近年來,由于社會團體的蓬勃發(fā)展,以及其與身俱來的獨立性、非營利性等特征,使得社會團體作為行政公益訴訟的原告越來越受到人們的關(guān)注。本文的研究目的,是結(jié)合實際,從多方面多角度論證社會團體作為行政公益訴訟原告的可行性,同時借鑒相關(guān)經(jīng)驗,旨在為社會團體作行政公益訴訟原告的制度構(gòu)建提供一些思路和建議。本文研究的邏輯前提是我國已經(jīng)建立行政公益訴訟制度。但眾所周知,對于這一制度,目前我國還尚未建立�；诒疚牡难芯恐攸c以及論文篇幅限制,文章將只對社會團體提起行政公益訴訟的問題進行分析研究,不再對行政公益訴訟的一些其他內(nèi)容進行探討。本文在研究的過程中主要通過通過閱讀相關(guān)的文獻資料并進行分析、整理、整合,對國內(nèi)外相關(guān)的理論、制度設計等進行比較,同時,還通過對一些典型案例的分析,最終達到本文研究的目的。從研究內(nèi)容來看,本文分為五大部分。第一部分主要是介紹社會團體在行政公益訴訟中作原告的基本理論。內(nèi)容主要圍繞行政公益訴訟、原告資格、社會團體這三個關(guān)鍵詞的一些基本含義、特征及一些相關(guān)的理論來展開;第二部分主要是對社會團體作行政公益訴訟原告從基礎理論的角度進行分析。包括理論基礎,主要從社會制約權(quán)力理論以及人權(quán)保障理論兩方面來進行闡述。其次是對社會團體進行政公益訴訟的必要性進行分析,主要包括監(jiān)督行政權(quán)、民主參與、保護公益三個方面的內(nèi)容。最后是社會團體作為行政公益訴訟的原告的可行性,主要從其自身的優(yōu)勢、性質(zhì)以及其他領域甚至域外的成功經(jīng)驗等方面來闡述;第三部分是研究目前在我國,社會團體提起行政公益訴訟的一些現(xiàn)實困境。主要包括立法上的障礙、社會團體自身存在的一些問題、以及政社不分等情形;第四部分主要對域外一些法治較完善的國家的相關(guān)規(guī)定進行分析,主要包括美國、澳大利亞、英國、德國的現(xiàn)狀;第五部分作為文章的重點,主要是研究社會團體作行政公益訴訟原告,在我國如何進行制度構(gòu)建。包括破除立法上的障礙、完善社會團體自身建設、構(gòu)建可操作的起訴制度、限制制度、激勵制度等。在通過對社會團體作行政公益訴訟原告的相關(guān)問題進行分析研究之后,本文最終得出結(jié)論:在我國建立行政公益訴訟制度的前提下,賦予社會團體原告資格,不僅具備理論與現(xiàn)實意義,而且必要可行。
[Abstract]:The research of administrative public interest litigation has always been hot in academic circles. Among them, the plaintiff qualification is the focus of many scholars. In recent years, because of the vigorous development of social organizations, their independence and non-profit characteristics, social organizations as the plaintiff of administrative public interest litigation has attracted more and more attention. The purpose of this paper is to prove the feasibility of social organization as plaintiff of administrative public interest litigation from many aspects and from many angles, and to learn from relevant experience. The purpose is to provide some ideas and suggestions for the institution construction of the plaintiff in the administrative public interest litigation. The logical premise of this paper is that our country has established the administrative public interest litigation system. However, as we all know, this system has not yet been established in our country. Based on the focus of this paper and the limitations of the paper, the article will only analyze and study the issue of administrative public interest litigation filed by social organizations, and will no longer discuss some other contents of administrative public interest litigation. In the course of the study, this paper mainly through reading the relevant literature and materials and analysis, collation, integration, domestic and foreign related theory, system design, and so on, at the same time, through the analysis of some typical cases. Finally, the purpose of this paper is achieved. From the research content, this paper is divided into five parts. The first part mainly introduces the basic theory that social organizations act as plaintiffs in administrative public interest litigation. The content mainly revolves around the administrative public interest lawsuit, the plaintiff qualification, the social organization these three key words some basic meanings, the characteristic and some related theories to launch; The second part mainly analyzes the plaintiff in the administrative public interest litigation from the angle of basic theory. Including the theoretical basis, mainly from the social power theory and human rights protection theory to elaborate. Secondly, it analyzes the necessity of the public interest litigation, including the supervision of administrative power, democratic participation and protection of public welfare. Finally, the feasibility of social organizations as the plaintiff of administrative public interest litigation, mainly from its own advantages, nature and other fields and even foreign successful experience to elaborate; The third part is to study the current situation of administrative public interest litigation filed by social organizations in China. It mainly includes the obstacles in legislation, some problems existing in the social organizations themselves, as well as the situation that the government and the society have no distinction. The fourth part mainly analyzes the relevant provisions of some countries with perfect rule of law, including the current situation of the United States, Australia, Britain and Germany. The fifth part, as the focus of the article, mainly studies how to construct the system as the plaintiff of administrative public interest litigation in our country. It includes breaking down the legislative obstacles, perfecting the social organization's own construction, constructing the actionable prosecution system, the restriction system, the incentive system and so on. After analyzing and studying the related problems of the plaintiff in the administrative public interest litigation of the social organization, this paper finally draws the conclusion: under the premise of establishing the administrative public interest litigation system in our country, the plaintiff of the social organization is endowed with the qualification of the plaintiff of the social organization. It is not only of theoretical and practical significance, but also necessary and feasible.
【學位授予單位】：山西大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 廖鴻;李培曉;;現(xiàn)代社會組織體制將怎樣“煉”成——社會組織權(quán)威專家研討落實十八大精神[J];中國社會組織;2013年01期

2 楊建順;;《行政訴訟法》的修改與行政公益訴訟[J];法律適用;2012年11期

3 章志遠;;行政公益訴訟熱的冷思考[J];法學評論;2007年01期

4 蔡虹,梁遠;也論行政公益訴訟[J];法學評論;2002年03期

5 岳頌東;市場經(jīng)濟條件下的社團組織[J];中國青年科技;1999年03期

6 高家偉;論行政訴訟原告資格[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);1997年01期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 劉卉;;美國公益訴訟全方位保護公眾權(quán)益[N];檢察日報;2004年

，

本文編號：2334693