毒品犯罪誘惑偵查實(shí)證研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-10 23:46
【摘要】：隨著毒品犯罪的形式日趨多樣化、隱蔽化,傳統(tǒng)的回應(yīng)型偵查模式已難以完成打擊犯罪的任務(wù)要求。為了保障社會(huì)的安定有序,世界各國(guó)逐步探索出應(yīng)對(duì)現(xiàn)代新型犯罪的偵查模式——主動(dòng)型偵查。其中,對(duì)于科技手段依賴程度不高、偵查成本相對(duì)較低的誘惑偵查,因其取證的直接性和及時(shí)性而得到世界各國(guó)的普遍青睞。我國(guó)于2012年《刑事訴訟法》修訂中肯定了誘惑偵查的合法地位,但宜粗不宜細(xì)的立法方針使得法律規(guī)定過(guò)于籠統(tǒng),實(shí)踐中各地司法機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)其適用情況出現(xiàn)分歧,學(xué)界和實(shí)務(wù)界也一直對(duì)其存廢問(wèn)題爭(zhēng)論不休,對(duì)該問(wèn)題進(jìn)行探討和審視具有較大的理論和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。論文除引言和結(jié)語(yǔ)外共有四個(gè)部分,共計(jì)三萬(wàn)余字。第一部分為毒品犯罪誘惑偵查的價(jià)值分析。從正面價(jià)值來(lái)看,誘惑偵查可以直接發(fā)現(xiàn)犯罪,提供取證便利,具有經(jīng)濟(jì)效益,同時(shí)具有一定的法理正當(dāng)性。從負(fù)面價(jià)值分析,誘惑偵查可能誘使他人犯罪,浪費(fèi)司法資源;可能沖擊社會(huì)信用體系,加劇誠(chéng)信危機(jī);存在警察濫用職權(quán)的可能,容易滋生腐敗。因此,毒品犯罪誘惑偵查是一把雙刃劍。第二部分為毒品犯罪誘惑偵查的實(shí)踐考察。本文以C市J區(qū)和R市L區(qū)2012年至2014年6月毒品犯罪誘惑偵查案件為樣本,從宏觀和微觀兩個(gè)層面進(jìn)行調(diào)研。宏觀方面兩地司法實(shí)踐差異顯著,L區(qū)鮮有使用,而J區(qū)適用頻繁且批捕率居高不下,主要表現(xiàn)為積極回應(yīng)型、反復(fù)引誘型和數(shù)量引誘型三大類。微觀方面主要表現(xiàn)為程序操作隨意、非法證據(jù)排除較少、案件多來(lái)自群眾舉報(bào)、引誘對(duì)象選擇有針對(duì)性、案件審理多采用簡(jiǎn)易程序且普遍刑期較短。第三部分為毒品犯罪誘惑偵查存在的主要問(wèn)題及原因分析。通過(guò)實(shí)證分析,我國(guó)毒品犯罪誘惑偵查主要存在兩大問(wèn)題,一是立法規(guī)定總體較為粗疏,合法性規(guī)定不明,二是偵查行為不規(guī)范,整體處于失范、無(wú)序狀態(tài)。究其原因,一是立法規(guī)定模糊,二是程序有效規(guī)制缺失,三是非法證據(jù)排除存在困境,四是各地司法環(huán)境不同。第四部分為毒品犯罪誘惑偵查的法治化建構(gòu)。具體而言包括三個(gè)方面,一是要明確誘惑偵查的合法界限,主要表現(xiàn)為主觀方面應(yīng)排除犯意引誘的情形,客觀方面應(yīng)嚴(yán)格限制引誘的程度,謹(jǐn)慎對(duì)未成年人使用誘惑偵查,并結(jié)合實(shí)踐操作進(jìn)行具體區(qū)分;二是進(jìn)行有效的程序規(guī)制,啟動(dòng)程序需明確啟動(dòng)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和案件適用范圍,完善審批程序,嚴(yán)格執(zhí)行事前、事中、事后監(jiān)督程序,保障救濟(jì)之路,細(xì)化相關(guān)證據(jù)規(guī)則;三是建立科學(xué)的考核辦法,結(jié)合實(shí)際情況改變考核思路。
[Abstract]:With the diversification and concealment of drug crime, it is difficult for the traditional response investigation mode to fulfill the task of fighting crime. In order to ensure the stability and order of society, countries in the world have gradually explored the active investigation mode to deal with modern new crimes. Among them, because of its directness and timeliness of obtaining evidence, the enticement investigation, which is not highly dependent on scientific and technological means and relatively low in cost of investigation, is generally favored by all countries all over the world. In the revision of the Criminal procedure Law in 2012, our country affirmed the legal status of enticement investigation, but the legislative policy, which should be rough rather than detailed, made the legal provisions too general, and in practice, the judicial organs in various parts of the country had different opinions on its application. The academic and practical circles have been debating the issue of its retention and abolition. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to explore and examine the problem. In addition to the introduction and conclusion of the thesis there are four parts, a total of more than 30,000 words. The first part is the value analysis of drug crime. From the point of view of positive value, enticement investigation can find crime directly, provide evidence collection convenience, have economic benefit, at the same time have certain legal legitimacy. From the negative value analysis, the temptation investigation may induce others to commit crimes and waste judicial resources; may impact the social credit system, aggravate the credit crisis; there is the possibility of police abuse of power, easy to breed corruption. Therefore, drug crime temptation detection is a double-edged sword. The second part is the practical investigation of drug crime temptation investigation. This paper takes the cases of drug crime temptation investigation from 2012 to June 2014 in J District of C City and L District of R City as samples. The investigation is carried out at the macro and micro levels. There are significant differences in judicial practice between the two places in macro aspect, the L area is seldom used, while the J area is frequently used and the rate of authorized arrest is high, which mainly shows three categories: positive response type, repeated inducement type and quantitative inducement type. The microscopic aspect mainly shows that the procedure operation is random, the illegal evidence is excluded less, the case comes from the masses to report, the enticing object is targeted, the case trial mostly adopts the summary procedure and the general sentence is short. The third part is the analysis of the main problems and causes of the drug-induced investigation. Through empirical analysis, there are two main problems in the temptation investigation of drug crimes in our country. One is that the legislative provisions are generally rough, the legal provisions are unclear, and the other is that the investigation behavior is not standard and the whole is in a state of disorder. The reasons are that the legislation is vague, the procedure is not effective, the illegal evidence is ruled out, and the judicial environment is different. The fourth part is the legal construction of drug-induced investigation. Specifically, it includes three aspects. One is to make clear the legal limits of temptation investigation, which mainly shows that the subjective aspect should exclude the situation of criminal intention inducement, and the objective aspect should strictly limit the degree of temptation, and carefully use temptation investigation to minors. And combined with practical operation to make a specific distinction; The other is to regulate the procedure effectively. The starting procedure should define the standard of starting and the scope of application of the case, perfect the examination and approval procedure, strictly carry out the procedure of supervision in advance, during and after the event, safeguard the road of relief, and refine the relevant rules of evidence; Third, the establishment of scientific assessment methods, combined with the actual situation to change the assessment ideas.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2
[Abstract]:With the diversification and concealment of drug crime, it is difficult for the traditional response investigation mode to fulfill the task of fighting crime. In order to ensure the stability and order of society, countries in the world have gradually explored the active investigation mode to deal with modern new crimes. Among them, because of its directness and timeliness of obtaining evidence, the enticement investigation, which is not highly dependent on scientific and technological means and relatively low in cost of investigation, is generally favored by all countries all over the world. In the revision of the Criminal procedure Law in 2012, our country affirmed the legal status of enticement investigation, but the legislative policy, which should be rough rather than detailed, made the legal provisions too general, and in practice, the judicial organs in various parts of the country had different opinions on its application. The academic and practical circles have been debating the issue of its retention and abolition. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to explore and examine the problem. In addition to the introduction and conclusion of the thesis there are four parts, a total of more than 30,000 words. The first part is the value analysis of drug crime. From the point of view of positive value, enticement investigation can find crime directly, provide evidence collection convenience, have economic benefit, at the same time have certain legal legitimacy. From the negative value analysis, the temptation investigation may induce others to commit crimes and waste judicial resources; may impact the social credit system, aggravate the credit crisis; there is the possibility of police abuse of power, easy to breed corruption. Therefore, drug crime temptation detection is a double-edged sword. The second part is the practical investigation of drug crime temptation investigation. This paper takes the cases of drug crime temptation investigation from 2012 to June 2014 in J District of C City and L District of R City as samples. The investigation is carried out at the macro and micro levels. There are significant differences in judicial practice between the two places in macro aspect, the L area is seldom used, while the J area is frequently used and the rate of authorized arrest is high, which mainly shows three categories: positive response type, repeated inducement type and quantitative inducement type. The microscopic aspect mainly shows that the procedure operation is random, the illegal evidence is excluded less, the case comes from the masses to report, the enticing object is targeted, the case trial mostly adopts the summary procedure and the general sentence is short. The third part is the analysis of the main problems and causes of the drug-induced investigation. Through empirical analysis, there are two main problems in the temptation investigation of drug crimes in our country. One is that the legislative provisions are generally rough, the legal provisions are unclear, and the other is that the investigation behavior is not standard and the whole is in a state of disorder. The reasons are that the legislation is vague, the procedure is not effective, the illegal evidence is ruled out, and the judicial environment is different. The fourth part is the legal construction of drug-induced investigation. Specifically, it includes three aspects. One is to make clear the legal limits of temptation investigation, which mainly shows that the subjective aspect should exclude the situation of criminal intention inducement, and the objective aspect should strictly limit the degree of temptation, and carefully use temptation investigation to minors. And combined with practical operation to make a specific distinction; The other is to regulate the procedure effectively. The starting procedure should define the standard of starting and the scope of application of the case, perfect the examination and approval procedure, strictly carry out the procedure of supervision in advance, during and after the event, safeguard the road of relief, and refine the relevant rules of evidence; Third, the establishment of scientific assessment methods, combined with the actual situation to change the assessment ideas.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 楊寶宏;論誘惑偵查的法律規(guī)制[J];新疆警官高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2002年04期
2 馬紅平,駱廷文;誘惑偵查的法律規(guī)制[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年05期
3 張建波;關(guān)于誘惑偵查的立法探討[J];山東公安�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期
4 陳國(guó)華;論誘惑偵查的理論沖突及協(xié)調(diào)與控制[J];池州師專學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期
5 董坤;誘惑偵查的界定[J];中國(guó)刑事警察;2004年01期
6 姚華,馬紅平;我國(guó)誘惑偵查制度的立法建構(gòu)[J];政法學(xué)刊;2005年02期
7 楊光;誘惑偵查的法律規(guī)制[J];甘肅政法成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期
8 劉作凌,劉少坤;誘惑偵查的法律思考[J];佳木斯大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期
9 許文山;翁佳黎;;誘惑偵查適用新探[J];福建公安高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期
10 李心淑;;我國(guó)不宜建立誘惑偵查制度[J];西北第二民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條
1 劉杰;;職務(wù)犯罪誘惑偵查再思考[A];贛臺(tái)法學(xué)論壇文集——江西省犯罪學(xué)研究會(huì)年會(huì)（2011年）[C];2011年
2 周[，
本文編號(hào)：2323912
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2323912.html
最近更新
教材專著
