天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當前位置:主頁 > 法律論文 > 訴訟法論文 >

人權(quán)視野下刑訊逼供多元制衡機制研究

發(fā)布時間:2018-11-10 23:14
【摘要】:侵犯人權(quán)的刑訊逼供行為,損害的是人的尊嚴和價值,毀壞的是整個社會的人權(quán)理念和道德原則。其存在的深層次原因是"重打擊犯罪、輕人權(quán)保障"的傳統(tǒng)思想。我國憲法與刑事訴訟法先后將"尊重與保障人權(quán)"載入其中,具有重大的憲政意義和訴訟實踐意義。在各級偵查機關(guān)的正式文書和對外宣傳口徑中,刑訊逼供也遭到明確而堅決的反對。然而,在司法實踐中的刑訊逼供卻依然保持著旺盛的生命力。從立法宗旨和司法意圖上看,能否對刑訊逼供嚴防規(guī)制,是考察一個國家刑事司法技術(shù)的一個重要指標,同時也是評估刑事司法制度優(yōu)劣的一個不容忽視的問題。
[Abstract]:Extorting confessions by torture infringes human rights, harms human dignity and value, and destroys the human rights concept and moral principles of the whole society. The deep reason of its existence is the traditional thought of "paying more attention to the fight against crime than to the protection of human rights". Our constitution and criminal procedure law have included "respecting and protecting human rights", which has great constitutional significance and practical significance of litigation. In the official documents and propaganda of investigation organs at all levels, extortion of confessions by torture has also been clearly and resolutely opposed. However, in judicial practice, extorting confessions by torture still maintains a vigorous vitality. From the point of view of legislative purpose and judicial intention, it is an important index to investigate the criminal justice technology of a country, and it is also a problem that can not be ignored to evaluate the merits and demerits of criminal justice system.
【作者單位】: 中南財經(jīng)政法大學刑事司法學院;
【分類號】:D925.2

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 賀毓;;刑事司法贏得公眾信任研究[J];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2013年02期

2 葉寧;左勇;;犯罪打擊與權(quán)利保障的雙重悖反——刑事推定現(xiàn)狀的反思[J];法制與社會;2012年28期

3 ;[J];;年期

,

本文編號:2323843

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2323843.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶36892***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要刪除請E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com