【摘要】：公訴案件簡易審判程序是這樣一種程序：與普通程序進(jìn)行比較，公訴案件簡易程序?qū)徖磉^程中簡化了訴訟階段與環(huán)節(jié)。設(shè)置公訴案件簡易程序是追求司法公正與效率的必然選擇，，在司法實(shí)踐中意義頗為重大。在刑事訴訟資源有限而公訴案件不斷增加的背景下，協(xié)調(diào)好公正和效率的關(guān)系是公訴案件簡易審判程序得以存在的價(jià)值基礎(chǔ)。我們將二者位于這個(gè)程序中的關(guān)系定位為效率相對(duì)優(yōu)先、兼顧公正。 縱觀國外主要國家公訴案件簡易程序的設(shè)置，由于法律傳統(tǒng)和各國實(shí)際的不同呈現(xiàn)出不同的風(fēng)格特色。為了更好地把握簡易程序在公訴案件審理中發(fā)展的內(nèi)在規(guī)律，筆者對(duì)這些模型進(jìn)行了分析和總結(jié)，并探討了簡易程序發(fā)展的發(fā)展特點(diǎn)和趨勢。我國1996年刑事訴訟法增設(shè)了簡易程序。其后2012年刑事訴訟法又做出了大幅的修改和調(diào)整，在適用范圍、啟動(dòng)模式、審判方式等方面均發(fā)生了重大變化，使我國的刑事訴訟總體上保持了高效。然而，由于立法模式的一元化和配套制度的缺失，現(xiàn)有公訴案件簡易程序的實(shí)踐還是未能實(shí)現(xiàn)司法資源的最佳配置。 本文通過對(duì)域外代表性的公訴案件簡易程序模式較系統(tǒng)的考察，在分析我國公訴案件簡易審判程序?qū)嵤┈F(xiàn)狀的基礎(chǔ)上，為進(jìn)一步完善公訴案件簡易審判程序，提出了一些具體建議。在堅(jiān)持正當(dāng)程序原則的前提下，尋求公正與效率的平衡、懲罰犯罪與保障人權(quán)的平衡，是完善公訴案件簡易審判程序的原則。在具體原則的指導(dǎo)下，完善適用中的相關(guān)具體問題、建立書面審理程序和控辯協(xié)商程序等配套制度，積極解決實(shí)踐中的各種難題�？傊�，進(jìn)一步完善公訴案件簡易審判程序，是我國當(dāng)前的改革發(fā)展之路，有利于提高我國刑事訴訟的民主與文明水平。
[Abstract]:The summary trial procedure of public prosecution case is such a procedure: compared with ordinary procedure, the summary procedure of public prosecution case simplifies the stage and link of litigation. The establishment of summary procedure in public prosecution cases is an inevitable choice in pursuit of judicial justice and efficiency, which is of great significance in judicial practice. Under the background of the limited resources of criminal procedure and the increasing number of public prosecution cases, it is the value foundation for the summary trial procedure of public prosecution cases to coordinate the relationship between justice and efficiency. We position the relationship between the two in this procedure as the relative priority of efficiency and fairness. In view of the establishment of summary procedure of public prosecution cases in foreign countries, there are different styles and characteristics due to the differences of legal traditions and countries. In order to better understand the inherent law of the development of summary procedure in the trial of public prosecution cases, the author analyzes and summarizes these models, and probes into the characteristics and trends of the development of summary procedure. Summary procedure was added to our criminal procedure law in 1996. Since then, the Criminal procedure Law of 2012 has made a substantial revision and adjustment, in the scope of application, starting mode, trial methods and other aspects have undergone significant changes, so that the overall criminal proceedings in our country has maintained an efficient. However, due to the monism of legislative model and the lack of supporting system, the practice of summary procedure of public prosecution cases still fails to achieve the best allocation of judicial resources. Based on the analysis of the current situation of summary trial procedure of public prosecution cases in our country, this paper makes a systematic investigation on the mode of summary procedure of public prosecution cases in order to further improve the summary trial procedure of public prosecution cases. Some concrete suggestions are put forward. On the premise of adhering to the principle of due process, it is the principle to perfect the summary trial procedure of public prosecution cases by seeking the balance between justice and efficiency, between punishing crime and safeguarding human rights. Under the guidance of concrete principles, we should perfect the relevant concrete problems in application, establish the supporting systems such as written hearing procedure and procuratorial and defense consultation procedure, and solve all kinds of difficult problems in practice. In a word, further perfecting the summary trial procedure of public prosecution cases is the way of reform and development of our country at present, which is helpful to improve the democratic and civilized level of criminal procedure in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉根菊;李利君;;刑事簡易程序比較研究[J];比較法研究;2009年05期

2 張立彪;;我國刑事簡易程序之重構(gòu)[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2010年07期

3 柯葛壯;;刑事簡易程序的立法修改和實(shí)務(wù)運(yùn)作[J];東方法學(xué);2012年03期

4 高一飛;;刑事簡易程序?qū)徟兄袡z察制度的完善[J];河北法學(xué);2007年07期

5 李勛文;;公訴案件適用簡易程序?qū)徖硌芯縖J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年05期

6 刑事簡易程序研究課題組;;刑事簡易程序擴(kuò)大適用問題研究[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期

7 楊宇冠;;我國刑事訴訟簡易程序改革思考[J];杭州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年02期

8 謝小劍;;比較法視野下的刑事簡易程序[J];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

9 馬貴翔;柴曉宇;;刑事簡易程序系統(tǒng)的形成探析[J];金陵法律評(píng)論;2012年01期

10 王富超;;公訴案件適用簡易程序的思考[J];和田師范�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

本文編號(hào)：2298403