我國行政訴訟審判監(jiān)督程序研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-26 13:31
【摘要】：行政訴訟審判監(jiān)督程序是針對生效裁判所適用的一種特殊法律救濟程序,正是因為具有的補救價值,其在訴訟程序中有著十分重要的地位。審判監(jiān)督程序的完善,有利于保障當事人的訴權(quán),維護其合法權(quán)利,有利于裁判的公正性和正確性。但是長期以來,由于行政訴訟法規(guī)定的審判監(jiān)督程序過于簡略,以及缺乏有效的再審程序配套機制,司法實踐中出現(xiàn)了再審申訴率居高不下、當事人申請再審權(quán)難以實現(xiàn)等問題。因此,筆者認為應(yīng)當從立法上完善行政訴訟再審程序,構(gòu)建再審程序的相關(guān)配套機制,提高審判質(zhì)量,以訴權(quán)形式保證當事人合理再審需求,控制申訴泛濫,樹立司法權(quán)威,實現(xiàn)提起再審的方式從職權(quán)主義向當事人主義的轉(zhuǎn)變。只有這樣,才能從根本上解決目前我國行政訴訟審判監(jiān)督程序面臨的困境。本文對我國行政訴訟審判監(jiān)督程序的探討和研究,不再局限于擴大再審事由的范圍、放寬再審準入條件方面等內(nèi)容,而是從理論與實踐的兩個角度出發(fā)展開分析,針對我國行政訴訟審判監(jiān)督程序在立法上之不足,結(jié)合民事訴訟審判監(jiān)督程序和域外的成熟經(jīng)驗,提出完善行政訴訟審判監(jiān)督程序制度設(shè)定和保障機制的構(gòu)想。本文主要分為六章。第一章為引言,介紹了論文選題背景、選題意義、研究方法、國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀等問題。第二章為行政訴訟審判監(jiān)督程序概述,對審判監(jiān)督程序進行概念界定,介紹審判監(jiān)督程序的理論基礎(chǔ),梳理我國行政訴訟審判監(jiān)督程序的發(fā)展過程,分析其與民事訴訟審判監(jiān)督程序的關(guān)系和區(qū)別。第三章為域相關(guān)制度的介紹與評價,著重闡述了域外立法對我國的啟示與借鑒。第四章從立法和實踐兩個方面對我國行政訴訟審判監(jiān)督程序的現(xiàn)狀進行論述,并對其的不足進行反思。第五章為我國行政訴訟審判監(jiān)督程序的完善,根據(jù)第四章的論述,提出具體舉措和配套機制的完善對策。第六章為結(jié)論。
[Abstract]:The procedure of judicial supervision in administrative litigation is a special kind of legal relief procedure applied to the effective judgment. It is precisely because of its remedial value that it plays a very important role in the proceedings. The perfection of the procedure of trial supervision is conducive to the protection of the litigant's right of action, the protection of its legal right and the justice and correctness of the judge. However, for a long time, because the procedure of trial supervision stipulated in the Administrative procedure Law is too simple, and because of the lack of effective supporting mechanism of retrial procedure, the appeal rate of retrial appears to be high in judicial practice. The parties' right to apply for retrial is difficult to realize. Therefore, the author thinks that we should perfect the procedure of administrative litigation retrial in legislation, construct the relevant supporting mechanism of retrial procedure, improve the quality of trial, guarantee the reasonable retrial demand of the litigant in the form of right of action, control the overflow of complaints, and establish judicial authority. The way of bringing retrial is changed from authority doctrine to party doctrine. Only in this way, can we fundamentally solve the dilemma that our administrative litigation trial supervision procedure faces. In this paper, the discussion and research on the procedure of judicial supervision in administrative litigation in our country is no longer limited to expanding the scope of the cause of retrial and relaxing the conditions of admission of retrial, but is analyzed from the two angles of theory and practice. In view of the lack of legislation on the procedure of judicial supervision in administrative litigation in our country, combined with the trial supervision procedure of civil litigation and the mature experience of foreign countries, this paper puts forward the idea of perfecting the system of judicial supervision procedure and the guarantee mechanism of administrative litigation. This paper is divided into six chapters. The first chapter is the introduction, which introduces the background, significance, research methods and current research situation of the thesis. The second chapter is an overview of the procedure of trial supervision in administrative litigation. It defines the concept of the procedure of trial supervision, introduces the theoretical basis of the procedure of trial supervision, and combs the development process of the procedure of judicial supervision in administrative litigation of our country. This paper analyzes the relationship and difference between it and the procedure of trial supervision in civil litigation. The third chapter is the introduction and evaluation of the relevant systems, focusing on the enlightenment and reference of foreign legislation to our country. The fourth chapter discusses the current situation of our country's administrative litigation trial supervision procedure from the two aspects of legislation and practice, and reflects on its deficiency. The fifth chapter is the perfection of our country's administrative litigation trial supervision procedure, according to the fourth chapter's discussion, puts forward the concrete measure and the supporting mechanism consummation countermeasure. Chapter six is the conclusion.
【學位授予單位】：電子科技大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.3
本文編號：2295874
[Abstract]:The procedure of judicial supervision in administrative litigation is a special kind of legal relief procedure applied to the effective judgment. It is precisely because of its remedial value that it plays a very important role in the proceedings. The perfection of the procedure of trial supervision is conducive to the protection of the litigant's right of action, the protection of its legal right and the justice and correctness of the judge. However, for a long time, because the procedure of trial supervision stipulated in the Administrative procedure Law is too simple, and because of the lack of effective supporting mechanism of retrial procedure, the appeal rate of retrial appears to be high in judicial practice. The parties' right to apply for retrial is difficult to realize. Therefore, the author thinks that we should perfect the procedure of administrative litigation retrial in legislation, construct the relevant supporting mechanism of retrial procedure, improve the quality of trial, guarantee the reasonable retrial demand of the litigant in the form of right of action, control the overflow of complaints, and establish judicial authority. The way of bringing retrial is changed from authority doctrine to party doctrine. Only in this way, can we fundamentally solve the dilemma that our administrative litigation trial supervision procedure faces. In this paper, the discussion and research on the procedure of judicial supervision in administrative litigation in our country is no longer limited to expanding the scope of the cause of retrial and relaxing the conditions of admission of retrial, but is analyzed from the two angles of theory and practice. In view of the lack of legislation on the procedure of judicial supervision in administrative litigation in our country, combined with the trial supervision procedure of civil litigation and the mature experience of foreign countries, this paper puts forward the idea of perfecting the system of judicial supervision procedure and the guarantee mechanism of administrative litigation. This paper is divided into six chapters. The first chapter is the introduction, which introduces the background, significance, research methods and current research situation of the thesis. The second chapter is an overview of the procedure of trial supervision in administrative litigation. It defines the concept of the procedure of trial supervision, introduces the theoretical basis of the procedure of trial supervision, and combs the development process of the procedure of judicial supervision in administrative litigation of our country. This paper analyzes the relationship and difference between it and the procedure of trial supervision in civil litigation. The third chapter is the introduction and evaluation of the relevant systems, focusing on the enlightenment and reference of foreign legislation to our country. The fourth chapter discusses the current situation of our country's administrative litigation trial supervision procedure from the two aspects of legislation and practice, and reflects on its deficiency. The fifth chapter is the perfection of our country's administrative litigation trial supervision procedure, according to the fourth chapter's discussion, puts forward the concrete measure and the supporting mechanism consummation countermeasure. Chapter six is the conclusion.
【學位授予單位】：電子科技大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.3
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王亞新;;民事再審:程序的發(fā)展及其解釋適用[J];北方法學;2016年05期
2 王宇坤;;刑事再審功能定位的理論反思——從“糾錯型再審”到“救濟型再審”的轉(zhuǎn)型[J];華中師范大學研究生學報;2016年02期
3 劉欣琦;;新《行政訴訟法》實施后重作判決適用探析[J];政治與法律;2016年05期
4 雷澳星;;程序正義,司法公正的最后一道防線[J];法制與社會;2016年04期
5 羅騫;;新行政訴訟法適用的可預(yù)見問題及完善建議[J];法制與經(jīng)濟;2016年01期
6 王萬華;;新行政訴訟法中“行政行為”辨析——兼論我國應(yīng)加快制定行政程序法[J];國家檢察官學院學報;2015年04期
7 韋煒;周游;;新行政訴訟法適用中的六大問題[J];人民司法;2015年03期
8 王晴晴;;論審判監(jiān)督程序的完善[J];法制與社會;2014年17期
9 張嘉;;審判監(jiān)督程序的弊端及完善[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年10期
10 吳衛(wèi)軍;湯湘燕;;行政指導(dǎo)之司法審查透析[J];電子科技大學學報( 社科版);2013年04期
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前7條
1 李平;以法官中立性看程序正義的實現(xiàn)[D];西南政法大學;2015年
2 錢兆寧;英國刑事案件審查委員會再審審查程序研究[D];蘇州大學;2014年
3 丁明珠;南京國民政府時期《行政訴訟法》文本研究[D];西南政法大學;2014年
4 劉新星;再審程序構(gòu)造研究[D];西南政法大學;2011年
5 邵軍;行政訴訟判決的既判力研究[D];浙江工商大學;2008年
6 耿春霞;對我國再審程序的反思與重構(gòu)[D];河北大學;2007年
7 李小霞;行政判決既判力研究[D];西南政法大學;2006年
，本文編號：2295874
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2295874.html
