【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的快速發(fā)展,國(guó)家間的民事交往愈加頻繁,大量的涉外民事糾紛也隨之產(chǎn)生。涉外民事管轄權(quán)的確定是處理涉外民事糾紛的前提,但由于各國(guó)立法對(duì)涉外民事管轄權(quán)有著不同規(guī)定,容易導(dǎo)致涉外民事管轄權(quán)沖突的產(chǎn)生。涉外民事訴訟協(xié)議管轄作為當(dāng)事人意思自治在涉外民事訴訟領(lǐng)域的體現(xiàn),對(duì)避免或者消除涉外民事管轄權(quán)的積極沖突有著重要意義,并得到大多數(shù)國(guó)家的接受和采納。如今涉外民事協(xié)議管轄制度已在不同國(guó)家的法律和國(guó)際條約中得到了發(fā)展,涉外民事協(xié)議管轄在形式要件、選擇法院范圍、弱方當(dāng)事人的保護(hù)等方面呈現(xiàn)出許多新的發(fā)展趨勢(shì),其中不乏關(guān)于涉外協(xié)議管轄制度的合理先進(jìn)的立法規(guī)定值得我國(guó)借鑒。本文主要通過(guò)歷史分析法及比較分析法對(duì)涉外民事訴訟協(xié)議管轄制度進(jìn)行闡述,并試著提出具有創(chuàng)新性的思考和建議,以完善我國(guó)《民事訴訟法》中涉外民事協(xié)議管轄的相關(guān)規(guī)定。本文共有三章。第一章是涉外民事訴訟協(xié)議管轄的概述。以涉外民事協(xié)議管轄的定義為切入點(diǎn),分析了涉外民事協(xié)議管轄的類型及其性質(zhì)與效力問(wèn)題,介紹了涉外民事協(xié)議管轄的產(chǎn)生及目前的發(fā)展趨勢(shì),最后探討了該制度的作用與價(jià)值。第二章通過(guò)介紹目前具有代表性的國(guó)家及國(guó)際組織對(duì)涉外民事協(xié)議管轄的相關(guān)立法規(guī)定,總結(jié)了各國(guó)和國(guó)際組織在涉外民事訴訟協(xié)議管轄制度上的特點(diǎn)、經(jīng)驗(yàn)及趨勢(shì)。第三章分析我國(guó)涉外民事協(xié)議管轄的立法現(xiàn)狀及其不足之處,通過(guò)借鑒國(guó)外關(guān)于涉外民事訴訟協(xié)議管轄的經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出完善我國(guó)涉外民事協(xié)議管轄制度的一些建議。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economic globalization, civil communication between countries has become more frequent, and a large number of civil disputes involving foreign countries have also emerged. The determination of civil jurisdiction concerning foreign affairs is the premise of dealing with civil disputes involving foreign affairs. However, due to the different provisions on civil jurisdiction concerning foreign affairs in various countries, it is easy to cause conflicts of civil jurisdiction concerning foreign affairs. As the embodiment of party autonomy in the field of foreign civil action, the jurisdiction of civil action agreement concerning foreign affairs is of great significance to avoid or eliminate the positive conflict of civil jurisdiction concerning foreign affairs, and has been accepted and adopted by most countries. Nowadays, the jurisdiction system of civil agreement concerning foreign affairs has been developed in the laws and international treaties of different countries. The jurisdiction of civil agreement concerning foreign affairs has shown many new development trends in the aspects of formal elements, choice of court scope, protection of weak parties, etc. Among them, there are some reasonable and advanced legislative provisions on the jurisdiction system of foreign-related agreements which are worthy of our country's reference. This article mainly through the historical analysis method and the comparative analysis method carries on the elaboration to the foreign civil lawsuit agreement jurisdiction system, and tries to put forward the innovative thought and the suggestion, In order to improve the Civil procedure Law of China foreign civil agreement jurisdiction related provisions. There are three chapters in this paper. The first chapter is a summary of the jurisdiction of foreign civil litigation agreement. Based on the definition of foreign civil agreement jurisdiction, this paper analyzes the types, nature and effectiveness of foreign civil agreement jurisdiction, and introduces the emergence and current development trend of foreign civil agreement jurisdiction. Finally, the function and value of the system are discussed. The second chapter summarizes the characteristics, experiences and trends of the foreign civil agreement jurisdiction system of various countries and international organizations by introducing the relevant legislative provisions of the foreign civil agreement jurisdiction of the representative countries and international organizations at present. The third chapter analyzes the current legislative situation and shortcomings of foreign civil agreement jurisdiction in our country, and puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the jurisdiction system of foreign civil agreement by referring to the experience of foreign countries.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃忠順;;應(yīng)訴管轄原則之制度展開(kāi)[J];東方法學(xué);2016年06期

2 黃忠順;;論應(yīng)訴管轄制度的司法嬗變及其規(guī)則構(gòu)建[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2016年05期

3 蔡俊;;民事訴訟中的應(yīng)訴管轄制度研究[J];武漢理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年05期

4 袁發(fā)強(qiáng);瞿佳琪;;論協(xié)議管轄中的“實(shí)際聯(lián)系地”——立法目的與效果的失衡[J];國(guó)際法研究;2016年05期

5 吳永輝;;論新《民訴法》第34條對(duì)涉外協(xié)議管轄的法律適用[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2016年05期

6 郭玉軍;司文;;國(guó)際民事訴訟中應(yīng)訴管轄標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究[J];蘇州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2016年03期

7 張彩云;;我國(guó)涉外民事訴訟程序相關(guān)問(wèn)題解析——兼評(píng)《解釋》涉外民事訴訟程序特別規(guī)定[J];濰坊學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年04期

8 陳姝文;;兩大法系下協(xié)議選擇法院制度的萌芽與發(fā)展[J];法制與社會(huì);2016年23期

9 趙洋;;涉外民商事訴訟協(xié)議管轄規(guī)則研究——兼評(píng)海牙《選擇法院協(xié)議公約》[J];商;2016年20期

10 宰曉燕;;我國(guó)涉外民商事訴訟管轄權(quán)制度的完善[J];法制與社會(huì);2016年12期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 梁昭儀;;論管轄協(xié)議的效力范圍[A];“決策論壇——管理決策模式應(yīng)用與分析學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)”論文集（下）[C];2016年

，

本文編號(hào)：2290359