【摘要】：伴隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)的飛速發(fā)展,電子郵箱、手機(jī)短信、電子商務(wù)等信息交流手段已經(jīng)勢(shì)不可擋地進(jìn)入我們的日常生活中,并對(duì)我們的生活產(chǎn)生了重大的影響。電子數(shù)據(jù)作為證據(jù)的一種類(lèi)型被寫(xiě)入2012年修訂后的民事訴訟法中,這是我國(guó)民事訴訟法學(xué)的一大進(jìn)步,為我們將來(lái)解決信息化程度不斷升級(jí)的案件提供了重要的基礎(chǔ)保障。但是我國(guó)相關(guān)立法中關(guān)于電子數(shù)據(jù)的配套規(guī)定卻寥寥無(wú)幾,對(duì)于其適用規(guī)則、技術(shù)方面的規(guī)定還遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)達(dá)不到英美國(guó)家的水平,這必然增加了民事審判程序正常進(jìn)行的難度,導(dǎo)致了民事訴訟中證據(jù)交換無(wú)法及時(shí)進(jìn)行,大大降低了司法權(quán)威性,妨礙了民事訴訟追求效率的價(jià)值要求。鑒于此,有必要對(duì)民事訴訟電子數(shù)據(jù)證據(jù)交換制度進(jìn)行理論研究,為立法和司法提供相應(yīng)的理論依據(jù)。本文從電子數(shù)據(jù)證據(jù)交換制度的概念入手,對(duì)兩大法系電子數(shù)據(jù)證據(jù)交換制度進(jìn)行比較研究,在對(duì)我國(guó)電子數(shù)據(jù)證據(jù)交換制度的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行分析的基礎(chǔ)上,提出了完善我國(guó)電子數(shù)據(jù)證據(jù)交換制度的建議,以期對(duì)我國(guó)民事電子數(shù)據(jù)證據(jù)交換制度的體系建設(shè)有所裨益。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of network technology, electronic mail, mobile phone SMS, electronic commerce and other means of information exchange has been irresistible into our daily life, and has had a significant impact on our lives. Electronic data, as a type of evidence, is written into the revised civil procedure law in 2012, which is a great progress of civil procedural law in our country, and provides an important basic guarantee for us to solve the continuously upgraded cases of informationization in the future. However, there are very few supporting provisions on electronic data in the relevant legislation of our country. For the applicable rules, the technical provisions are still far from the level of the Anglo-American countries, which will inevitably increase the difficulty of the normal conduct of the civil trial procedure. As a result, the exchange of evidence in civil proceedings cannot be carried out in time, which greatly reduces the judicial authority and hinders the value requirement of efficiency in civil litigation. In view of this, it is necessary to carry on the theoretical research on the electronic data evidence exchange system in civil litigation, to provide the corresponding theoretical basis for the legislation and the judicature. Starting with the concept of electronic data evidence exchange system, this paper makes a comparative study on the electronic data evidence exchange system in two legal systems, and analyzes the present situation of electronic data evidence exchange system in China. The paper puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the electronic data evidence exchange system in order to benefit the system construction of the civil electronic data evidence exchange system in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.13

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 喬雄兵;;美國(guó)電子證據(jù)開(kāi)示變革及對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年01期

2 刁勝先;李艷;;論電子認(rèn)證的法律關(guān)系[J];重慶郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年06期

3 湯維建;民事訴訟中證據(jù)交換制度的確立和完善[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

4 杜聞;;英美民事證據(jù)開(kāi)示若干問(wèn)題研析[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2008年06期

5 劉方權(quán);;技術(shù)與法律雙重視野下的電子證據(jù)搜查扣押——以“肉食者”系統(tǒng)引發(fā)的爭(zhēng)議為例[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2010年01期

6 湯維建,陳巍;《關(guān)于民事訴訟證據(jù)的若干規(guī)定》的創(chuàng)新與不足[J];法商研究;2005年03期

7 陳桂明,紀(jì)格非;美國(guó)證據(jù)法中的保密特權(quán)原則及其對(duì)我國(guó)證據(jù)立法的啟示[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2002年02期

8 周彥;;論電子證據(jù)的法律定位[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年12期

9 李揚(yáng);;論電子證據(jù)在我國(guó)新修《民事訴訟法》中的法律地位[J];重慶郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年06期

10 徐廣芹;;淺議新證據(jù)類(lèi)型電子數(shù)據(jù)的內(nèi)涵與認(rèn)定[J];北方文學(xué)(下旬);2012年11期

，

本文編號(hào)：2286440