【摘要】：司法改革的不斷發(fā)展促成了刑事公訴之"訴"的多元化,偵查人員在不同的"訴"中也相應表現(xiàn)出了不同的證人身份。在程序合法性之訴中,偵查人員的實體證人身份隨著程序進程逐漸向程序證人身份轉化,這種程序證人身份的實質則是程序之訴中的被告。這種二元身份的特點集中體現(xiàn)在回避和作證等問題上。雖然偵查人員作為被告乃程序合法性之訴中的當事人,但是其在缺席審判、申請回避以及獲得上訴救濟等方面卻不具有實體之訴中被告人享有的相應權利。從偵查人員的多重身份這一程序元素反映出程序之訴雖然在一定程度上獨立于實體之訴,但其本質上仍是一個"迷你審判"程序,程序之訴的完全獨立性有待于司法改革和理論研究的探索和拓展。
[Abstract]:The constant development of the judicial reform has promoted the diversification of the "suit" of the criminal prosecution, and the investigators have also displayed different witness identities in different "lawsuits". In the litigation of procedural legality, the substantive witness identity of the investigator is gradually transformed into the procedural witness identity with the procedure process, and the essence of the procedural witness identity is the defendant in the procedural lawsuit. The characteristics of this dual identity are embodied in the problems of avoidance and testimony. Although the investigator is the litigant in the lawsuit of procedural legality, he does not have the corresponding rights of the defendant in the substantive suit in the aspects of trial in absentia, application for withdrawal and obtaining appeal relief. The procedural element of the multiple identities of the investigators reflects that although the procedural action is somewhat independent of the substantive one, it is still essentially a "mini-trial" procedure. The complete independence of procedural litigation needs to be explored and expanded by judicial reform and theoretical research.
【作者單位】： 北京大學法學院;
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 陳衛(wèi)東;;中國刑事證據法的新發(fā)展——評兩個證據規(guī)定[J];法學家;2010年05期

2 陳瑞華;;程序性裁判中的證據規(guī)則[J];法學家;2011年03期

3 陳瑞華;;論偵查人員的證人地位[J];暨南學報(哲學社會科學版);2012年02期

4 鄧思清;;刑事缺席審判制度研究[J];法學研究;2007年03期

5 陳瑞華;;非法證據排除規(guī)則的中國模式[J];中國法學;2010年06期

6 陳瑞華;;法律程序構建的基本邏輯[J];中國法學;2012年01期

7 陳瑞華;;刑事司法裁判的三種形態(tài)[J];中外法學;2012年06期

【共引文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 熊志海;王耀s，

本文編號：2268045