【摘要】：在民事訴訟中,附理由的否認(rèn)乃是與單純的否認(rèn)相對的否認(rèn)形態(tài)。與單純的否認(rèn)相比,附理由的否認(rèn)能有效地促進(jìn)當(dāng)事人之間爭點的形成從而能保障法院進(jìn)行充實的、有效率的證據(jù)調(diào)查。在德國、日本等大陸法系國家的民事訴訟中,附理由的否認(rèn)已呈義務(wù)化之趨向。無論是其判例還是學(xué)說均強(qiáng)調(diào),不負(fù)證明責(zé)任的當(dāng)事人若否認(rèn)對方當(dāng)事人所主張的事實,必須附有理由進(jìn)行具體的陳述,而單純的否認(rèn)通常被認(rèn)為是不合法的從而視為承認(rèn)對方當(dāng)事人所主張的事實。附理由的否認(rèn)義務(wù)乃是基于誠實信用原則而創(chuàng)設(shè)的個別性義務(wù)。為平衡雙方當(dāng)事人訴訟上的不利益之歸屬,不負(fù)證明責(zé)任的當(dāng)事人履行附理由的否認(rèn)義務(wù)須以對方當(dāng)事人所主張的事實已合乎具體化之要求為前提。不過,在情報偏在性的事件中,應(yīng)例外地承認(rèn)不負(fù)證明責(zé)任的當(dāng)事人對對方當(dāng)事人所為的抽象的事實主張也負(fù)有附理由的否認(rèn)義務(wù)。
[Abstract]:In civil proceedings, denial with reasons is a form of denial opposite to simple denial. Compared with the simple denial, the reasoned denial can effectively promote the formation of disputes between the parties and thus ensure the court to conduct substantial and efficient evidence investigation. In civil litigation in Germany, Japan and other civil law countries, the denial of reasons has become obligatory. Whether in its jurisprudence or doctrine, it is emphasized that a party that is not responsible for proof must, if it denies the facts claimed by the other party, make a specific statement with reasons, A mere denial is often considered illegal and thus an acknowledgement of the facts claimed by the other party. The obligation to deny with reason is an individual obligation created on the basis of the principle of good faith. In order to balance the attribution of the non-interests of the parties, the parties who do not bear the burden of proof must perform the disavowal obligation with reasons on the premise that the facts advocated by the other party have met the requirement of materialization. However, in cases where intelligence is biased, it should be acknowledged that the irresponsible party is also under a reasoned denial obligation for the abstract factual claim of the other party's actions.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D915.2
，

本文編號：2262840