遠(yuǎn)程審判與司法創(chuàng)新的路徑探討——兼論民間法的功能和定位
發(fā)布時間:2018-09-18 09:05
【摘要】:法院的遠(yuǎn)程審判制度作為一項司法制度創(chuàng)新,其價值主要表現(xiàn)為:遠(yuǎn)程審判制度是一項司法便民的舉措;遠(yuǎn)程審判制度減少了訴訟成本、提高了審判的公開、透明和公正性;遠(yuǎn)程審判制度促進(jìn)法制統(tǒng)一,加快法治文明的進(jìn)程。同時對于遠(yuǎn)程審判存在三個方面的爭議,即遠(yuǎn)程審判的合法性問題、適用條件以及經(jīng)費(fèi)保障問題。遠(yuǎn)程審判作為一個高科技手段在庭審中的運(yùn)用,改變了"法律不入之地"的尷尬,同時給民間法的功能和定位帶來了新的轉(zhuǎn)變。在對遠(yuǎn)程審判制度價值論述的基礎(chǔ)上,以小見大,對我國司法制度創(chuàng)新的路徑進(jìn)行有益的探索,認(rèn)為中國司法制度的創(chuàng)新必須同時符合三個條件,即合法性、合民意性以及合社會發(fā)展性。
[Abstract]:As an innovation of the judicial system, the value of the remote trial system of the court is as follows: the remote trial system is a convenient measure for the administration of justice, the remote trial system reduces the litigation cost, and improves the openness, transparency and fairness of the trial. The remote trial system promotes the unification of the legal system and speeds up the process of civilization of the rule of law. At the same time, there are three controversies about the remote trial, namely, the legality of the remote trial, the applicable conditions and the financial guarantee. The application of remote trial as a high-tech means in the trial has changed the embarrassment of "the place where the law does not enter" and brought a new change to the function and orientation of the folk law. On the basis of expounding the value of the remote trial system, the author finds out the whole through a small part, and probes into the path of the innovation of the judicial system of our country. The author thinks that the innovation of the judicial system in China must meet three conditions simultaneously, that is, the legality. In line with public opinion and social development.
【作者單位】: 上海大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】:李瑜青教授主持的2011年度中國法學(xué)會(部級)重大研究課題《法律實施的保障機(jī)制研究》(CLS(2011)A04)的研究成果之一
【分類號】:D926.2
[Abstract]:As an innovation of the judicial system, the value of the remote trial system of the court is as follows: the remote trial system is a convenient measure for the administration of justice, the remote trial system reduces the litigation cost, and improves the openness, transparency and fairness of the trial. The remote trial system promotes the unification of the legal system and speeds up the process of civilization of the rule of law. At the same time, there are three controversies about the remote trial, namely, the legality of the remote trial, the applicable conditions and the financial guarantee. The application of remote trial as a high-tech means in the trial has changed the embarrassment of "the place where the law does not enter" and brought a new change to the function and orientation of the folk law. On the basis of expounding the value of the remote trial system, the author finds out the whole through a small part, and probes into the path of the innovation of the judicial system of our country. The author thinks that the innovation of the judicial system in China must meet three conditions simultaneously, that is, the legality. In line with public opinion and social development.
【作者單位】: 上海大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】:李瑜青教授主持的2011年度中國法學(xué)會(部級)重大研究課題《法律實施的保障機(jī)制研究》(CLS(2011)A04)的研究成果之一
【分類號】:D926.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條
1 張鈞;;法律多元理論及其在中國的新發(fā)展[J];法學(xué)評論;2010年04期
2 楊文杰;馮靜;;回應(yīng)的無力——讀諾內(nèi)特與塞爾茲尼克著《轉(zhuǎn)變中的法律與社會:邁向回應(yīng)型法》[J];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報(綜合版);2007年02期
3 趙斌;;民間法研究中的“現(xiàn)代化范式”與“法律多元”[J];江海學(xué)刊;2010年04期
4 付雄;葉三方;;論遠(yuǎn)程審判的適用規(guī)則——克服遠(yuǎn)程審判之不足的制度設(shè)計[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會科學(xué)(漢文版);2011年04期
5 張,
本文編號:2247432
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2247432.html
最近更新
教材專著