【摘要】：審辯交易和審辯對抗是審辯關(guān)系異化的兩種樣態(tài)。前者以"權(quán)力尋租"為主要體現(xiàn),反映法官和律師由法律職業(yè)共同體向利益共同體的畸變;后者以"審辯對抗"為指涉對象,體現(xiàn)法官和律師在訴訟角色上的緊張關(guān)系。"消費(fèi)"司法公信力、讓現(xiàn)實(shí)利益壓制法律人共同的正義信仰、司法公開渠道阻塞皆為產(chǎn)生亂象之根源。協(xié)同主義訴訟理念強(qiáng)調(diào)法官和當(dāng)事人應(yīng)互助合作,協(xié)同推進(jìn)訴訟程序的進(jìn)行。刑事程序中的審辯關(guān)系可在回歸現(xiàn)行法律框架的基礎(chǔ)上借鑒該理念,搭建審辯充分溝通與對話的平臺(tái),通過法官職權(quán)向訴訟弱方的適度傾斜,彌補(bǔ)控辯雙方訴訟能力的實(shí)質(zhì)差異。
[Abstract]:The transaction of trial and the confrontation between trial and argument are two kinds of dissimilation of the relationship between trial and argument. The former is mainly embodied in "power rent-seeking", which reflects the distortion of judges and lawyers from the legal professional community to the community of interests, while the latter refers to "adversarial confrontation", which reflects the tense relationship between judges and lawyers in the role of litigation. " Consumption "judicial credibility, let the real interests suppress the common legal belief in justice, the obstruction of judicial open channels are the root causes of chaos." The idea of synergetic litigation emphasizes that judges and parties should cooperate with each other and promote the proceeding of litigation. On the basis of returning to the current legal framework, the relationship between trial and defense in criminal procedure can be used for reference, and a platform for full communication and dialogue between trial and argument can be built. To make up for the substantive differences between the prosecution and the defense.
【作者單位】： 中國政法大學(xué)刑事司法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D925.2
，

本文編號：2245184