【摘要】：2012年新修訂的《民事訴訟法》第13條第1款明確規(guī)定“民事訴訟應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則”。該原則的引入為防止當(dāng)事人的權(quán)利濫用提供了立法上的依據(jù)，也賦予了法官在法律適用中為追求具體社會(huì)公正而解釋或彌補(bǔ)法律漏洞的正當(dāng)性。盡管對(duì)該原則的適用主體還有爭(zhēng)議，但從理論上來說，除了適用于當(dāng)事人以外，誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則也適用于法官。從現(xiàn)行立法文本來看，關(guān)于誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則所適用的路徑及不同路徑下的適用規(guī)則、司法實(shí)踐中的具體適用情形和違反該原則的法律責(zé)任等問題尚未明確，該原則實(shí)際上呈現(xiàn)出令人擔(dān)憂的空洞化狀態(tài)。因此，本文將針對(duì)上述問題一一展開探討。 本文包括緒論、正文、結(jié)語三個(gè)部分，其中正文由四章組成，主要內(nèi)容如下： 第一章在明確法律原則適用的含義基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則的適用主體范圍作了廣義的解釋。然后，對(duì)訴訟誠(chéng)信原則在當(dāng)事人之間、當(dāng)事人及法官之間適用的必要性、現(xiàn)實(shí)困境和制度保障進(jìn)行了論述。 第二章在吸收法理學(xué)對(duì)法律原則如何適用的理論基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)民事訴訟中當(dāng)事人直接援引誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則時(shí)的適用規(guī)則和法院直接援引誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則時(shí)的適用規(guī)則進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)論述，以避免該原則的濫用。 第三章具體分析了我國(guó)民事司法實(shí)務(wù)中誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則具體適用的表現(xiàn)形式。首先，對(duì)違反誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則訴訟行為的構(gòu)成要件進(jìn)行了總結(jié)；其次，重點(diǎn)探討了兩種場(chǎng)合下誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則的具體適用情形，具體分為當(dāng)事人之間違反誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則的情形以及當(dāng)事人與法院之間違反誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則的情形，，從而為法官識(shí)別、規(guī)范違反該原則的行為提供參考。 第四章主要是結(jié)合上文的分析，探討民事訴訟中違反誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則的法律責(zé)任。首先，明晰承擔(dān)法律責(zé)任的條件；其次，分別論述違反該原則的實(shí)體性責(zé)任的承擔(dān)形式和程序性責(zé)任的承擔(dān)形式，以保障誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則在民事訴訟中的有效實(shí)施。
[Abstract]:Article 13, paragraph 1, of the newly amended Code of Civil procedure in 2012 stipulates that "the principle of good faith shall be followed in civil proceedings." The introduction of this principle provides a legislative basis for the prevention of the abuse of rights of the parties, and also gives judges the legitimacy to interpret or make up the loopholes in the pursuit of specific social justice in the application of the law. Although the application of the principle is controversial, in theory, except for the parties, the principle of good faith also applies to judges. From the view of the current legislative text, the application of the principle of good faith and the applicable rules under different paths, the specific application situation in judicial practice and the legal liability for violating the principle have not yet been clarified. The principle actually presents a worrisome state of hollowing out. Therefore, this paper will discuss the above problems one by one. This paper includes three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the text is composed of four chapters. The main contents are as follows: the first chapter is based on the clear meaning of the application of legal principles. This paper gives a broad explanation of the subject scope of the principle of good faith. Then, it discusses the necessity, realistic predicament and system guarantee of the application of the principle of good faith in litigation between the parties, the parties and the judges. The second chapter, on the basis of absorbing the theory of jurisprudence how to apply the principle of law, discusses in detail the applicable rules when the parties directly invoke the principle of good faith in civil litigation and the applicable rules when the court directly invokes the principle of good faith. To avoid abuse of the principle. The third chapter analyzes the concrete expression of the principle of good faith in the practice of civil justice in China. First of all, it summarizes the constitutive elements of the action of violating the principle of good faith. Secondly, it focuses on the concrete application of the principle of good faith in two situations. It can be divided into the situation of violating the principle of good faith between the parties and the situation of violating the principle of good faith between the parties and the court, thus providing a reference for the judge to identify and standardize the violation of the principle. Chapter four mainly discusses the legal liability of violating the principle of good faith in civil litigation. Firstly, the condition of legal liability should be clear; secondly, the form of substantive liability and the form of procedural responsibility should be discussed respectively to ensure the effective implementation of the principle of good faith in civil proceedings.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 葉名怡;;侵權(quán)法上故意與過失的區(qū)分及其意義[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2010年04期

2 楊海;胡亞球;;裁判視野下之誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則——立足于法官裁判行為的研究[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2012年02期

3 方曉陽;;禁止訴訟權(quán)利濫用的法理分析——以日本為主視角的研究[J];福建法學(xué);2003年03期

4 黃娟;對(duì)在我國(guó)民事訴訟法中確立誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則的冷思考[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2001年06期

5 王福華;民事訴訟誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則論[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1999年04期

6 湯維建;;論民事訴訟中的誠(chéng)信原則[J];法學(xué)家;2003年03期

7 王書成;;論比例原則中的利益衡量[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

8 王亞新;;我國(guó)新民事訴訟法與誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則——以日本民事訴訟立法經(jīng)過及司法實(shí)務(wù)為參照[J];比較法研究;2012年05期

9 張衛(wèi)平;;民事訴訟中的誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2012年06期

10 熊躍敏,吳澤勇;民事訴訟中的誠(chéng)信原則探究[J];河北法學(xué);2002年04期

本文編號(hào)：2242488