【摘要】：以行政訴訟地域管轄的相關(guān)理論為基礎(chǔ)，通過結(jié)合《行政訴訟法修正案（草案）》的立法規(guī)定以及改革嘗試來分析我國當(dāng)前行政訴訟地域管轄制度的現(xiàn)實(shí)困境，并借鑒域外行政訴訟地域管轄制度的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)，提出進(jìn)一步完善行政訴訟地域管轄制度的構(gòu)想。 文章分為五個(gè)部分: 緒論部分結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐探索情況，對文章的選題背景進(jìn)行闡述。 第一章，行政訴訟地域管轄的基本理論。該章首先論述行政訴訟的含義及其基本特征，并進(jìn)一步論述行政訴訟地域管轄的含義及其基本特征。通過對行政訴訟地域管轄制度的基本理論進(jìn)行梳理，為后文論述奠定基點(diǎn)。 第二章，我國行政訴訟地域管轄制度的立法現(xiàn)狀及缺陷分析。通過對行政訴訟地域管轄制度的立法現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行梳理，本章在第一章的基礎(chǔ)上，結(jié)合我國的立法現(xiàn)狀歸納出行政訴訟地域管轄制度的缺陷所在，得出機(jī)械套用民事訴訟“原告就被告”原則、法律規(guī)定滯后的結(jié)論。最后，從制度原因和實(shí)踐原因兩方面對行政訴訟地域管轄制度存在缺陷的原因進(jìn)行了全面分析。 第三章，域外行政訴訟地域管轄制度及其借鑒。本章通過對兩大法系國家行政訴訟地域管轄制度的介紹，為我國行政訴訟地域管轄制度的完善提供了借鑒啟示。 第四章，，對當(dāng)前實(shí)踐中行政訴訟地域管轄制度探索的綜述。本章對實(shí)踐中異地管轄和集中管轄兩大實(shí)踐探索的改革嘗試進(jìn)行介紹，特別對實(shí)踐工作中法院的行政審判數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行總結(jié)研究，并作出評價(jià)。 第五章及結(jié)論部分，行政訴訟地域管轄制度的完善構(gòu)想。本章首先對行政訴訟地域管轄的一般原則及立法規(guī)則進(jìn)行重構(gòu)，其次，結(jié)合立法現(xiàn)狀，提出行政訴訟異地管轄制度進(jìn)一步完善的具體構(gòu)想。最后在改革嘗試中南寧市各轄區(qū)法院的行政審判數(shù)據(jù)的基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行分析，并結(jié)合域外行政訴訟地域管轄的制度設(shè)計(jì)，建議以立法形式構(gòu)建集中管轄制度。
[Abstract]:Based on the relevant theories of administrative litigation regional jurisdiction, this paper analyzes the current dilemma of administrative litigation regional jurisdiction system by combining the legislative provisions and reform attempts of "Administrative procedure Law Amendment (draft)". Drawing lessons from the advanced experience of the regional jurisdiction system of the foreign administrative litigation, this paper puts forward the conception of further perfecting the regional jurisdiction system of the administrative litigation. The article is divided into five parts: the introduction part combined with judicial practice to explore the background of the selection of the article. The first chapter is the basic theory of administrative litigation jurisdiction. This chapter first discusses the meaning of administrative litigation and its basic characteristics, and further discusses the meaning and basic characteristics of administrative litigation regional jurisdiction. Through combing the basic theory of the administrative litigation regional jurisdiction system, lay the foundation for the later discussion. The second chapter, the legislation status and defect analysis of our country administrative litigation regional jurisdiction system. By combing the current legislative situation of the administrative litigation regional jurisdiction system, this chapter summarizes the defects of the administrative litigation regional jurisdiction system on the basis of the first chapter, combined with the current legislative situation of our country. The conclusion is drawn that the principle of "plaintiff is defendant" and the legal provisions lag behind in mechanically applied civil action. Finally, the author analyzes the defects of the administrative litigation jurisdiction system from the two aspects of system reasons and practical reasons. The third chapter, the extraterritorial administrative litigation regional jurisdiction system and its reference. Through the introduction of the regional jurisdiction system of administrative litigation in the two legal system countries, this chapter provides a reference for the perfection of the regional jurisdiction system of administrative litigation in our country. The fourth chapter, the current practice of administrative proceedings in the exploration of regional jurisdiction system. This chapter introduces the reform attempts of the practice of jurisdiction in different places and centralized jurisdiction in practice, especially summarizes and studies the court's administrative trial data in practice, and makes an evaluation. The fifth chapter and the conclusion part, the administrative litigation district jurisdiction system consummates the idea. Firstly, this chapter reconstructs the general principles and legislative rules of administrative litigation jurisdiction. Secondly, combined with the current situation of legislation, the author puts forward the concrete idea of further perfection of administrative litigation jurisdiction system. Finally, on the basis of analyzing the administrative trial data of the courts in Nanning, and combining with the system design of the extraterritorial administrative litigation jurisdiction, it is suggested that the centralized jurisdiction system should be constructed in the form of legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 浙江高院課題組;包祥水;;行政案件管轄問題的調(diào)研報(bào)告[J];法律適用;2007年01期

2 張衛(wèi)平;論我國法院體制的非行政化——法院體制改革的一種基本思路[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2000年03期

3 張倩;;行政訴訟異地交叉管轄[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年18期

4 王小娟;;完善我國行政訴訟制度的思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年21期

5 章劍生;;行政訴訟法修改的基本立場[J];廣東社會(huì)科學(xué);2013年01期

6 章志遠(yuǎn);;行政案件相對集中管轄制度之省思[J];法治研究;2013年10期

7 鄭騰龍;;試論行政訴訟的地域管轄[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬);2011年12期

8 梁鳳云;;《行政訴訟法》修改八論[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

9 李榮珍;潘娜;;論我國行政訴訟管轄制度的改革與完善[J];海南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

10 王斌林;;行政訴訟異地審判的規(guī)范分析[J];南華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年03期

本文編號：2228074